Bojanić, Petar D.

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
orcid::0000-0001-9324-2209
  • Bojanić, Petar D. (234)
  • Bojanić, Petar (56)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Protocolli di teoria del progetto

Bojanić, Petar

(Torino: Academia University Press, 2022)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2647
PB  - Torino: Academia University Press
T2  - Praticare la Teoria
T1  - Protocolli di teoria del progetto
SP  - 3
EP  - 9
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Bojanić, Petar",
year = "2022",
publisher = "Torino: Academia University Press",
journal = "Praticare la Teoria",
booktitle = "Protocolli di teoria del progetto",
pages = "3-9"
}
Bojanić, P.. (2022). Protocolli di teoria del progetto. in Praticare la Teoria
Torino: Academia University Press., 3-9.
Bojanić P. Protocolli di teoria del progetto. in Praticare la Teoria. 2022;:3-9..
Bojanić, Petar, "Protocolli di teoria del progetto" in Praticare la Teoria (2022):3-9.

Thomas Hobbes on Betrayal of the Fatherland (In War)

Bojanić, Petar

(САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ, 2022)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2646
AB  - My intention is to demonstrate how Hobbes’ attempts to adapt two ancient institutions from Roman
Law to his own time and knowledge of theology and philosophy. Treason (and the figure of the traitor)
could be quite significant within the context of Hobbes’ (but not only his) understanding of the figure
of the sovereign and sovereignty. The central part of the text is an endeavor to ascertain the source and
unconditional condition for treason as such, within the framework of Hobbes’ theory of representation
(representatio) which he writes about in Chapter 16 of the Leviathan. The act or performance in which we
could perhaps recognize a traitorous gesture (or the dynamic of treason) could be found in the so-called
paradox of representation. The “traitor” breaks the chain of the transfer of power and empowerment,
thus stops representation, and puts an end to speaking in the name of the other. If it is possible to discover
whether this is possible and whether speaking and acting in one’s own name always carries elements of
treason, then we can conclude that differing forms of “direct” speech and action (“in one’s own name”)
are “acts of treason.” In that case, what interests me is whether “treason” is found within the heart of representative
democracy, and thus if it is de facto an integral part of a democratic order and society.
PB  - САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ
T2  - Horizon Феноменологические исследования
T1  - Thomas Hobbes on Betrayal of the Fatherland (In War)
IS  - 1
VL  - 11
SP  - 421
EP  - 440
DO  - 10.21638/2226-5260-2022-11-421-440
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar",
year = "2022",
abstract = "My intention is to demonstrate how Hobbes’ attempts to adapt two ancient institutions from Roman
Law to his own time and knowledge of theology and philosophy. Treason (and the figure of the traitor)
could be quite significant within the context of Hobbes’ (but not only his) understanding of the figure
of the sovereign and sovereignty. The central part of the text is an endeavor to ascertain the source and
unconditional condition for treason as such, within the framework of Hobbes’ theory of representation
(representatio) which he writes about in Chapter 16 of the Leviathan. The act or performance in which we
could perhaps recognize a traitorous gesture (or the dynamic of treason) could be found in the so-called
paradox of representation. The “traitor” breaks the chain of the transfer of power and empowerment,
thus stops representation, and puts an end to speaking in the name of the other. If it is possible to discover
whether this is possible and whether speaking and acting in one’s own name always carries elements of
treason, then we can conclude that differing forms of “direct” speech and action (“in one’s own name”)
are “acts of treason.” In that case, what interests me is whether “treason” is found within the heart of representative
democracy, and thus if it is de facto an integral part of a democratic order and society.",
publisher = "САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ",
journal = "Horizon Феноменологические исследования",
title = "Thomas Hobbes on Betrayal of the Fatherland (In War)",
number = "1",
volume = "11",
pages = "421-440",
doi = "10.21638/2226-5260-2022-11-421-440"
}
Bojanić, P.. (2022). Thomas Hobbes on Betrayal of the Fatherland (In War). in Horizon Феноменологические исследования
САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ УНИВЕРСИТЕТ., 11(1), 421-440.
https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2022-11-421-440
Bojanić P. Thomas Hobbes on Betrayal of the Fatherland (In War). in Horizon Феноменологические исследования. 2022;11(1):421-440.
doi:10.21638/2226-5260-2022-11-421-440 .
Bojanić, Petar, "Thomas Hobbes on Betrayal of the Fatherland (In War)" in Horizon Феноменологические исследования, 11, no. 1 (2022):421-440,
https://doi.org/10.21638/2226-5260-2022-11-421-440 . .

The Police: Instituting Violence

Bojanić, Petar; Pudar Draško, Gazela

(New York: Lexington Books, 2022)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2529
AB  - Speaking of the institution of the police in his famous 1921 text “Zur Kritik
der Gewalt” (“Toward the Critique of Violence”), Walter Benjamin gives two
very important characteristics of police violence.1 The first and fundamental
characteristic is that the police are always connected to violence but that the
police’s role within the state is difficult to pinpoint, given that the police
constitute an “institution of the modern State” (Benjamin 1986: 286–87).
Our intention in this text is to show that police violence is a consequence of
a deformation of the institution of police or a deformation of violence.
PB  - New York: Lexington Books
T2  - Violence and Reflexivity: The Place of Critique in the Reality of Domination
T1  - The Police: Instituting Violence
SP  - 157
EP  - 170
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Bojanić, Petar and Pudar Draško, Gazela",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Speaking of the institution of the police in his famous 1921 text “Zur Kritik
der Gewalt” (“Toward the Critique of Violence”), Walter Benjamin gives two
very important characteristics of police violence.1 The first and fundamental
characteristic is that the police are always connected to violence but that the
police’s role within the state is difficult to pinpoint, given that the police
constitute an “institution of the modern State” (Benjamin 1986: 286–87).
Our intention in this text is to show that police violence is a consequence of
a deformation of the institution of police or a deformation of violence.",
publisher = "New York: Lexington Books",
journal = "Violence and Reflexivity: The Place of Critique in the Reality of Domination",
booktitle = "The Police: Instituting Violence",
pages = "157-170"
}
Bojanić, P.,& Pudar Draško, G.. (2022). The Police: Instituting Violence. in Violence and Reflexivity: The Place of Critique in the Reality of Domination
New York: Lexington Books., 157-170.
Bojanić P, Pudar Draško G. The Police: Instituting Violence. in Violence and Reflexivity: The Place of Critique in the Reality of Domination. 2022;:157-170..
Bojanić, Petar, Pudar Draško, Gazela, "The Police: Instituting Violence" in Violence and Reflexivity: The Place of Critique in the Reality of Domination (2022):157-170.

О метаморфозе одного института гражданского общества

Bojanić, Petar

(Российской академии наук (Институт философии РАН), 2022)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2523
AB  - В статье изложена версия эволюции института полиции, который исходно
являлся частью гражданского общества, а не государства. Несколько абза-
цев из лекций Гегеля по философии права становятся отправной точкой
данной реконструкции. Опираясь на высказанные в них идеи, автор объяс-
няет механизм возникновения полиции из деятельности граждан по уста-
навлению правил (протоколов) взаимодействия, надзор за которыми они
сообща ведут ради общего блага, – в этом, собственно, изначально и состо-
ит назначение полиции. Предлагаемая реконструкция может быть полезна
в двух аспектах. Во-первых, она указывает на постепенное вырождение ин-
ститута полиции, на превращение ее из института гражданского общества
в элемент системы государства и орган внешнего насилия, а следовательно,
на уменьшение участия граждан в деятельности надзора за соблюдением
общего блага и на превращение их в пассивный объект чуждого властного
воздействия. Во-вторых, данная реконструкция показывает, что различные
виды современной гражданской активности в области социальной полити-
ки (policy making) зарождались как часть первых полицейских протоколов
и связанных с ними действий.
AB  - The article presents a version of the evolution of the police institution, which
was originally part of civil society, not the state. A few paragraphs from
Hegel’s lectures on the philosophy of law become the starting point of this reconstruction.
Based on the ideas expressed in them, the author explains the
mechanism of the emergence of the police from the activities of citizens to establish
rules (protocols) of interaction, the supervision of which they jointly
conduct for the common good – this, in fact, is the purpose of the police ini -
tially. The proposed reconstruction can be useful in two aspects. Firstly, it
points to the gradual degeneration of the institution of the police, to its transformation
from an institution of civil society into an element of the state sys -
tem and an organ of external violence, and consequently, to a decrease in the
participation of citizens in the supervision of the observance of the common
good and their transformation into a passive object of alien power influence.
Secondly, this reconstruction shows that various types of modern civic activity
in the field of social policy (policy making) originated as part of the first police
protocols and related actions.
PB  - Российской академии наук (Институт философии РАН)
T2  - Вопросы философии
T1  - О метаморфозе одного института гражданского общества
T1  - On the Metamorphosis of One Institution of Civil Society
IS  - 3
SP  - 34
EP  - 41
DO  - 10.21146/0042-8744-2022-3-34-41
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar",
year = "2022",
abstract = "В статье изложена версия эволюции института полиции, который исходно
являлся частью гражданского общества, а не государства. Несколько абза-
цев из лекций Гегеля по философии права становятся отправной точкой
данной реконструкции. Опираясь на высказанные в них идеи, автор объяс-
няет механизм возникновения полиции из деятельности граждан по уста-
навлению правил (протоколов) взаимодействия, надзор за которыми они
сообща ведут ради общего блага, – в этом, собственно, изначально и состо-
ит назначение полиции. Предлагаемая реконструкция может быть полезна
в двух аспектах. Во-первых, она указывает на постепенное вырождение ин-
ститута полиции, на превращение ее из института гражданского общества
в элемент системы государства и орган внешнего насилия, а следовательно,
на уменьшение участия граждан в деятельности надзора за соблюдением
общего блага и на превращение их в пассивный объект чуждого властного
воздействия. Во-вторых, данная реконструкция показывает, что различные
виды современной гражданской активности в области социальной полити-
ки (policy making) зарождались как часть первых полицейских протоколов
и связанных с ними действий., The article presents a version of the evolution of the police institution, which
was originally part of civil society, not the state. A few paragraphs from
Hegel’s lectures on the philosophy of law become the starting point of this reconstruction.
Based on the ideas expressed in them, the author explains the
mechanism of the emergence of the police from the activities of citizens to establish
rules (protocols) of interaction, the supervision of which they jointly
conduct for the common good – this, in fact, is the purpose of the police ini -
tially. The proposed reconstruction can be useful in two aspects. Firstly, it
points to the gradual degeneration of the institution of the police, to its transformation
from an institution of civil society into an element of the state sys -
tem and an organ of external violence, and consequently, to a decrease in the
participation of citizens in the supervision of the observance of the common
good and their transformation into a passive object of alien power influence.
Secondly, this reconstruction shows that various types of modern civic activity
in the field of social policy (policy making) originated as part of the first police
protocols and related actions.",
publisher = "Российской академии наук (Институт философии РАН)",
journal = "Вопросы философии",
title = "О метаморфозе одного института гражданского общества, On the Metamorphosis of One Institution of Civil Society",
number = "3",
pages = "34-41",
doi = "10.21146/0042-8744-2022-3-34-41"
}
Bojanić, P.. (2022). О метаморфозе одного института гражданского общества. in Вопросы философии
Российской академии наук (Институт философии РАН).(3), 34-41.
https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-3-34-41
Bojanić P. О метаморфозе одного института гражданского общества. in Вопросы философии. 2022;(3):34-41.
doi:10.21146/0042-8744-2022-3-34-41 .
Bojanić, Petar, "О метаморфозе одного института гражданского общества" in Вопросы философии, no. 3 (2022):34-41,
https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-3-34-41 . .

О метаморфозе одного института гражданского общества

Bojanić, Petar

(Moskva: Российская академия наук, Институт философии РАН, 2022)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2499
AB  - В статье изложена версия эволюции института полиции, который, исходно
являлся частью гражданского общества, а не государства. Несколько абза цев из лекций Гегеля по философии права становятся отправной точкой
данной реконструкции. Опираясь на высказанные в них идеи, автор объяс няет механизм возникновения полиции из деятельности граждан по уста навлению правил (протоколов) взаимодействия, надзор за которыми они
сообща ведут ради общего блага, – в этом, собственно, изначально и состо ит назначение полиции. Предлагаемая реконструкция может быть полезна
в двух аспектах. Во-первых, она указывает на постепенное вырождение ин ститута полиции, на превращение ее из института гражданского общества
в элемент системы государства и орган внешнего насилия, а следовательно,
на уменьшение участия граждан в деятельности надзора за соблюдением
общего блага и на превращение их в пассивный объект чуждого властного
воздействия. Во-вторых, данная реконструкция показывает, что различные
виды современной гражданской активности в области социальной полити ки (policy making) зарождались как часть первых полицейских протоколов
и связанных с ними действий.
AB  - The article presents a version of the evolution of the police institution, which
was originally part of civil society, not the state. A few paragraphs from Hegel’s
lectures on the philosophy of law become the starting point of this reconstruc tion. Based on the ideas expressed in them, the author explains the mechanism of
the emergence of the police from the activities of citizens to establish rules (pro tocols) of interaction, the supervision of which they jointly conduct for the com mon good – this, in fact, is the purpose of the police initially. The proposed re construction can be useful in two aspects. Firstly, it points to the gradual
degeneration of the institution of the police, to its transformation from an institu tion of civil society into an element of the state system and an organ of external
violence, and consequently, to a decrease in the participation of citizens in the
supervision of the observance of the common good and their transformation into
a passive object of alien power influence. Secondly, this reconstruction shows
that various types of modern civic activity in the field of social policy (policy
making) originated as part of the first police protocols and related actions.
PB  - Moskva: Российская академия наук, Институт философии РАН
T2  - Вопросы философии
T1  - О метаморфозе одного института гражданского общества
T1  - On the metamorphosis of one Institution of Civil Society
IS  - 3
SP  - 34
EP  - 42
DO  - 10.21146/0042-8744-2022-3-34-40
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar",
year = "2022",
abstract = "В статье изложена версия эволюции института полиции, который, исходно
являлся частью гражданского общества, а не государства. Несколько абза цев из лекций Гегеля по философии права становятся отправной точкой
данной реконструкции. Опираясь на высказанные в них идеи, автор объяс няет механизм возникновения полиции из деятельности граждан по уста навлению правил (протоколов) взаимодействия, надзор за которыми они
сообща ведут ради общего блага, – в этом, собственно, изначально и состо ит назначение полиции. Предлагаемая реконструкция может быть полезна
в двух аспектах. Во-первых, она указывает на постепенное вырождение ин ститута полиции, на превращение ее из института гражданского общества
в элемент системы государства и орган внешнего насилия, а следовательно,
на уменьшение участия граждан в деятельности надзора за соблюдением
общего блага и на превращение их в пассивный объект чуждого властного
воздействия. Во-вторых, данная реконструкция показывает, что различные
виды современной гражданской активности в области социальной полити ки (policy making) зарождались как часть первых полицейских протоколов
и связанных с ними действий., The article presents a version of the evolution of the police institution, which
was originally part of civil society, not the state. A few paragraphs from Hegel’s
lectures on the philosophy of law become the starting point of this reconstruc tion. Based on the ideas expressed in them, the author explains the mechanism of
the emergence of the police from the activities of citizens to establish rules (pro tocols) of interaction, the supervision of which they jointly conduct for the com mon good – this, in fact, is the purpose of the police initially. The proposed re construction can be useful in two aspects. Firstly, it points to the gradual
degeneration of the institution of the police, to its transformation from an institu tion of civil society into an element of the state system and an organ of external
violence, and consequently, to a decrease in the participation of citizens in the
supervision of the observance of the common good and their transformation into
a passive object of alien power influence. Secondly, this reconstruction shows
that various types of modern civic activity in the field of social policy (policy
making) originated as part of the first police protocols and related actions.",
publisher = "Moskva: Российская академия наук, Институт философии РАН",
journal = "Вопросы философии",
title = "О метаморфозе одного института гражданского общества, On the metamorphosis of one Institution of Civil Society",
number = "3",
pages = "34-42",
doi = "10.21146/0042-8744-2022-3-34-40"
}
Bojanić, P.. (2022). О метаморфозе одного института гражданского общества. in Вопросы философии
Moskva: Российская академия наук, Институт философии РАН.(3), 34-42.
https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-3-34-40
Bojanić P. О метаморфозе одного института гражданского общества. in Вопросы философии. 2022;(3):34-42.
doi:10.21146/0042-8744-2022-3-34-40 .
Bojanić, Petar, "О метаморфозе одного института гражданского общества" in Вопросы философии, no. 3 (2022):34-42,
https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-3-34-40 . .

Провокация: Воззвание и право на переворот

Bojanić, Petar

(Екатеринбург ; Москва : Кабинетный ученый, 2022)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2528
AB  - Эта небольшая книга написана в форме литературно- Петар Боянич
философского эссе и создана на основе серии лекций,
прочитанных Петаром Бояничем, сербским философом,
учеником Деррида, в Белграде для средств массовой
информации во второй половине октября 2007 года.
На сербском языке книга вышла в 2008 году. Мы пред-
лагаем перевод книги на русский язык, рассчитанный
на самые широкие читательские круги, интересующи-
еся историей культуры и современной философией.
PB  - Екатеринбург ; Москва : Кабинетный ученый
T1  - Провокация: Воззвание и право на переворот
T1  - Provocatio: Vokativ Ius Revolucija
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Bojanić, Petar",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Эта небольшая книга написана в форме литературно- Петар Боянич
философского эссе и создана на основе серии лекций,
прочитанных Петаром Бояничем, сербским философом,
учеником Деррида, в Белграде для средств массовой
информации во второй половине октября 2007 года.
На сербском языке книга вышла в 2008 году. Мы пред-
лагаем перевод книги на русский язык, рассчитанный
на самые широкие читательские круги, интересующи-
еся историей культуры и современной философией.",
publisher = "Екатеринбург ; Москва : Кабинетный ученый",
title = "Провокация: Воззвание и право на переворот, Provocatio: Vokativ Ius Revolucija"
}
Bojanić, P.. (2022). Провокация: Воззвание и право на переворот. 
Екатеринбург ; Москва : Кабинетный ученый..
Bojanić P. Провокация: Воззвание и право на переворот. 2022;..
Bojanić, Petar, "Провокация: Воззвание и право на переворот" (2022).

Suosjećajno djelovanje. Angažman i suosjećanje kao ključni elementi konstituiranja grupe

Bojanić, Petar; Cvejić, Igor; Nikolić, Olga

(Zagreb: Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo, 2021)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
AU  - Cvejić, Igor
AU  - Nikolić, Olga
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://hrcak.srce.hr/272033
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2671
AB  - Naš je glavni cilj opisati strukturu angažiranih akata i suosjećanja i njihovu konstitutivnu povezanost da bismo objasnili ključnu ulogu angažiranih i suosjećajnih akata za konstituiranje grupe. U prvom dijelu teksta, formuliramo ideju-vodilju: ključ za razumijevanje suosjećanja leži u razumijevanju angažmana i obratno. Zatim, okrećemo se razmatranju problematičnoga karaktera angažiranih akata: oni, s jedne strane, ne ispunjavaju uvjete pripisivosti pluralnom subjektu, dok se, s druge strane, ne mogu objasniti bez pretpostavke pluralnoga subjekta. Da bismo to razumjeli, oslanjamo se, prije svega, na Helmovu teoriju emocija i klasične fenomenološke analize konstituiranja pluralnoga subjekta, ali i ukazujemo na njihova ograničenja. U posljednjim dvama odjeljcima ćemo, nadovezujući se na Nussbauminu teoriju suosjećanja, opisati paralelizam i konstitutivnu povezanost u strukturi suosjećanja i angažmana. Na kraju, ispitat ćemo specifičan način na koji (suosjećajni) angažirani akti »stavljaju teret« i transformiraju grupu u instituciju.
AB  - Our main goal is to describe the structure of engaged acts and compassion and their constitutive
interrelation to explicate the key role of engaged and compassionate acts for group constitution.
In the first part of the paper, we formulate our guiding idea: the key to understanding compassion lies in understanding engagement and vice versa. We then consider the problematic nature
of engaged acts: On the one hand, they do not meet the conditions to be attributed to the plural
subject; on the other hand, they cannot be understood without presupposing the plural subject.
To understand this, we rely primarily on Helm’s theory of emotions and the classical phenomenological analyses of the constitution of the plural subject, but we also point out the limitations
of the latter. In the last two sections, we build on Nussbaum’s theory of compassion to describe
the parallelism in the structure of compassion and engagement and to show their constitutive
connection. Finally, we examine the specific way in which (compassionate) engaged acts “place
burden” and transform a group into an institution
PB  - Zagreb: Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo
T2  - Filozofska istraživanja
T1  - Suosjećajno djelovanje. Angažman i suosjećanje kao ključni elementi konstituiranja grupe
T1  - Acting Compassionately. Engagement and Compassion as the Key Elements of Group Constitution
IS  - 4
VL  - 41
SP  - 813
EP  - 830
DO  - 10.21464/fi41409
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar and Cvejić, Igor and Nikolić, Olga",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Naš je glavni cilj opisati strukturu angažiranih akata i suosjećanja i njihovu konstitutivnu povezanost da bismo objasnili ključnu ulogu angažiranih i suosjećajnih akata za konstituiranje grupe. U prvom dijelu teksta, formuliramo ideju-vodilju: ključ za razumijevanje suosjećanja leži u razumijevanju angažmana i obratno. Zatim, okrećemo se razmatranju problematičnoga karaktera angažiranih akata: oni, s jedne strane, ne ispunjavaju uvjete pripisivosti pluralnom subjektu, dok se, s druge strane, ne mogu objasniti bez pretpostavke pluralnoga subjekta. Da bismo to razumjeli, oslanjamo se, prije svega, na Helmovu teoriju emocija i klasične fenomenološke analize konstituiranja pluralnoga subjekta, ali i ukazujemo na njihova ograničenja. U posljednjim dvama odjeljcima ćemo, nadovezujući se na Nussbauminu teoriju suosjećanja, opisati paralelizam i konstitutivnu povezanost u strukturi suosjećanja i angažmana. Na kraju, ispitat ćemo specifičan način na koji (suosjećajni) angažirani akti »stavljaju teret« i transformiraju grupu u instituciju., Our main goal is to describe the structure of engaged acts and compassion and their constitutive
interrelation to explicate the key role of engaged and compassionate acts for group constitution.
In the first part of the paper, we formulate our guiding idea: the key to understanding compassion lies in understanding engagement and vice versa. We then consider the problematic nature
of engaged acts: On the one hand, they do not meet the conditions to be attributed to the plural
subject; on the other hand, they cannot be understood without presupposing the plural subject.
To understand this, we rely primarily on Helm’s theory of emotions and the classical phenomenological analyses of the constitution of the plural subject, but we also point out the limitations
of the latter. In the last two sections, we build on Nussbaum’s theory of compassion to describe
the parallelism in the structure of compassion and engagement and to show their constitutive
connection. Finally, we examine the specific way in which (compassionate) engaged acts “place
burden” and transform a group into an institution",
publisher = "Zagreb: Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo",
journal = "Filozofska istraživanja",
title = "Suosjećajno djelovanje. Angažman i suosjećanje kao ključni elementi konstituiranja grupe, Acting Compassionately. Engagement and Compassion as the Key Elements of Group Constitution",
number = "4",
volume = "41",
pages = "813-830",
doi = "10.21464/fi41409"
}
Bojanić, P., Cvejić, I.,& Nikolić, O.. (2021). Suosjećajno djelovanje. Angažman i suosjećanje kao ključni elementi konstituiranja grupe. in Filozofska istraživanja
Zagreb: Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo., 41(4), 813-830.
https://doi.org/10.21464/fi41409
Bojanić P, Cvejić I, Nikolić O. Suosjećajno djelovanje. Angažman i suosjećanje kao ključni elementi konstituiranja grupe. in Filozofska istraživanja. 2021;41(4):813-830.
doi:10.21464/fi41409 .
Bojanić, Petar, Cvejić, Igor, Nikolić, Olga, "Suosjećajno djelovanje. Angažman i suosjećanje kao ključni elementi konstituiranja grupe" in Filozofska istraživanja, 41, no. 4 (2021):813-830,
https://doi.org/10.21464/fi41409 . .

At Home, at Mine (chez moi). Return to Oneself

Bojanić, Petar

(Department of English Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt, 2021)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2230
AB  - My intention is to reconstruct three “relational notions”
(Popper) – house, homeland, and nostalgia – in order to
show the violent strategies that determine them and on
which they depend. Nostalgia and the idea of returning
to “oneself ”, along with various protocols of affirmation
of identity, birth, and dwelling, imply interruption of
war and violence while also allowing for their possibil ity and renewal. The text affirms Clausewitz’s notion of
friction and reveals its potential for any possible theory
of peace.
PB  - Department of English Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt
T2  - Colloquium: New Philologies
T1  - At Home, at Mine (chez moi). Return to Oneself
IS  - 1
VL  - 6
SP  - 1
EP  - 13
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar",
year = "2021",
abstract = "My intention is to reconstruct three “relational notions”
(Popper) – house, homeland, and nostalgia – in order to
show the violent strategies that determine them and on
which they depend. Nostalgia and the idea of returning
to “oneself ”, along with various protocols of affirmation
of identity, birth, and dwelling, imply interruption of
war and violence while also allowing for their possibil ity and renewal. The text affirms Clausewitz’s notion of
friction and reveals its potential for any possible theory
of peace.",
publisher = "Department of English Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt",
journal = "Colloquium: New Philologies",
title = "At Home, at Mine (chez moi). Return to Oneself",
number = "1",
volume = "6",
pages = "1-13"
}
Bojanić, P.. (2021). At Home, at Mine (chez moi). Return to Oneself. in Colloquium: New Philologies
Department of English Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt., 6(1), 1-13.
Bojanić P. At Home, at Mine (chez moi). Return to Oneself. in Colloquium: New Philologies. 2021;6(1):1-13..
Bojanić, Petar, "At Home, at Mine (chez moi). Return to Oneself" in Colloquium: New Philologies, 6, no. 1 (2021):1-13.

Provocatio: vocativo ius rivoluzione

Bojanić, Petar

(Milano: Mimesis Edizioni, 2021)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2257
AB  - Lo ius provocationis, celebre istituzione della Repubblica romana, permetteva 
all’accusato (e al condannato) di proteggersi dalle rappresaglie della polizia al 
momento dell’arresto con una richiesta di aiuto al popolo (provocatio ad populum) per chiedere il riesame del processo. Lo svolgimento di una nuova udienza, davanti al popolo e con il popolo, 
rendeva possibile la modifica e il rinvio della pena (o della violenza). In questo libro Petar Bojani´c indaga e analizza lo ius provocationis, la prima organizzazio ne giuridica nella storia che proteggeva la vita e sospendeva la pena capitale. 
La ricostruzione che fa di questa istituzione dimenticata attualizza i segreti del 
termine “provocazione” e i suoi diversi usi nella storia della giustizia, della democrazia e della ribellione.
PB  - Milano: Mimesis Edizioni
T1  - Provocatio: vocativo ius rivoluzione
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Bojanić, Petar",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Lo ius provocationis, celebre istituzione della Repubblica romana, permetteva 
all’accusato (e al condannato) di proteggersi dalle rappresaglie della polizia al 
momento dell’arresto con una richiesta di aiuto al popolo (provocatio ad populum) per chiedere il riesame del processo. Lo svolgimento di una nuova udienza, davanti al popolo e con il popolo, 
rendeva possibile la modifica e il rinvio della pena (o della violenza). In questo libro Petar Bojani´c indaga e analizza lo ius provocationis, la prima organizzazio ne giuridica nella storia che proteggeva la vita e sospendeva la pena capitale. 
La ricostruzione che fa di questa istituzione dimenticata attualizza i segreti del 
termine “provocazione” e i suoi diversi usi nella storia della giustizia, della democrazia e della ribellione.",
publisher = "Milano: Mimesis Edizioni",
title = "Provocatio: vocativo ius rivoluzione"
}
Bojanić, P.. (2021). Provocatio: vocativo ius rivoluzione. 
Milano: Mimesis Edizioni..
Bojanić P. Provocatio: vocativo ius rivoluzione. 2021;..
Bojanić, Petar, "Provocatio: vocativo ius rivoluzione" (2021).

Part Three, Book One: The Fire or The Eternal Life

Bojanić, Petar

(London: Ubiquity Press Ltd, 2021)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2266
PB  - London: Ubiquity Press Ltd
T2  - The Star for Beginners: Introductions to the  Magnum Opus of Franz Rosenzweig
T1  - Part Three, Book One: The Fire or The Eternal Life
DO  - 10.5334/bco
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Bojanić, Petar",
year = "2021",
publisher = "London: Ubiquity Press Ltd",
journal = "The Star for Beginners: Introductions to the  Magnum Opus of Franz Rosenzweig",
booktitle = "Part Three, Book One: The Fire or The Eternal Life",
doi = "10.5334/bco"
}
Bojanić, P.. (2021). Part Three, Book One: The Fire or The Eternal Life. in The Star for Beginners: Introductions to the  Magnum Opus of Franz Rosenzweig
London: Ubiquity Press Ltd..
https://doi.org/10.5334/bco
Bojanić P. Part Three, Book One: The Fire or The Eternal Life. in The Star for Beginners: Introductions to the  Magnum Opus of Franz Rosenzweig. 2021;.
doi:10.5334/bco .
Bojanić, Petar, "Part Three, Book One: The Fire or The Eternal Life" in The Star for Beginners: Introductions to the  Magnum Opus of Franz Rosenzweig (2021),
https://doi.org/10.5334/bco . .

Última guerra ou a guerra para fazer o mundo seguro para a democracia: Violência e direito em Hannah Arendt

Bojanić, Petar

(Goiânia: Universidade Federal de Goiás, 2021)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2447
AB  - Parafraseada no título deste texto está uma nota feita por Hannah Arendt em agosto de 1952.
Depois de ler Nomos da Terra de Carl Schmitt, Arendt tenta confrontar a ideia de Schmitt de uma
guerra justa. No texto, busco reconstruir as leituras de Arendt de diferentes textos de filosofia política
dentro do contexto de seu pensamento sobre a relação entre violência e poder, força e lei. A recusa
de Arendt em aceitar a existência de uma violência que pode “conquistar” a liberdade e “criar” o direito
e a democracia, contradiz a grande tradição dos seguidores de Marx, aos quais Arendt sem dúvida
pertence: A violência revolucionária é algo possível? Se sim, como? Por fim, violência como resistência
à injustiça traz justiça?
AB  - Paraphrased within the title of this text is a note Hannah Arendt made in August 1952. After
reading Carl Schmitt’s Nomos der Erde, Arendt tries to confront Schmitt’s idea of a just war. In the text
I attempt to reconstruct Arendt’s readings of differing political philosophy texts within the context of
her thinking concerning the relationship between violence and power, force and law. Arendt’s refusal
to accept the existence of violence which can “conquer” freedom and “create” right and democracy,
brings contradiction to the great tradition of the followers of Marx, to whom Arendt undoubtedly
belongs: how is and is revolutionary violence even possible and does violence as resistance to injustice
bring justice?
PB  - Goiânia: Universidade Federal de Goiás
T2  - História Revista
T1  - Última guerra ou a guerra para fazer o mundo seguro para a democracia: Violência e direito em Hannah Arendt
T1  - The Last War or The War to Make the World Safe for Democracy: Violence and Rights in Hannah Arendt
IS  - 2
VL  - 26
SP  - 184
EP  - 197
DO  - 10.5216/hr.v26i2.68282
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Parafraseada no título deste texto está uma nota feita por Hannah Arendt em agosto de 1952.
Depois de ler Nomos da Terra de Carl Schmitt, Arendt tenta confrontar a ideia de Schmitt de uma
guerra justa. No texto, busco reconstruir as leituras de Arendt de diferentes textos de filosofia política
dentro do contexto de seu pensamento sobre a relação entre violência e poder, força e lei. A recusa
de Arendt em aceitar a existência de uma violência que pode “conquistar” a liberdade e “criar” o direito
e a democracia, contradiz a grande tradição dos seguidores de Marx, aos quais Arendt sem dúvida
pertence: A violência revolucionária é algo possível? Se sim, como? Por fim, violência como resistência
à injustiça traz justiça?, Paraphrased within the title of this text is a note Hannah Arendt made in August 1952. After
reading Carl Schmitt’s Nomos der Erde, Arendt tries to confront Schmitt’s idea of a just war. In the text
I attempt to reconstruct Arendt’s readings of differing political philosophy texts within the context of
her thinking concerning the relationship between violence and power, force and law. Arendt’s refusal
to accept the existence of violence which can “conquer” freedom and “create” right and democracy,
brings contradiction to the great tradition of the followers of Marx, to whom Arendt undoubtedly
belongs: how is and is revolutionary violence even possible and does violence as resistance to injustice
bring justice?",
publisher = "Goiânia: Universidade Federal de Goiás",
journal = "História Revista",
title = "Última guerra ou a guerra para fazer o mundo seguro para a democracia: Violência e direito em Hannah Arendt, The Last War or The War to Make the World Safe for Democracy: Violence and Rights in Hannah Arendt",
number = "2",
volume = "26",
pages = "184-197",
doi = "10.5216/hr.v26i2.68282"
}
Bojanić, P.. (2021). Última guerra ou a guerra para fazer o mundo seguro para a democracia: Violência e direito em Hannah Arendt. in História Revista
Goiânia: Universidade Federal de Goiás., 26(2), 184-197.
https://doi.org/10.5216/hr.v26i2.68282
Bojanić P. Última guerra ou a guerra para fazer o mundo seguro para a democracia: Violência e direito em Hannah Arendt. in História Revista. 2021;26(2):184-197.
doi:10.5216/hr.v26i2.68282 .
Bojanić, Petar, "Última guerra ou a guerra para fazer o mundo seguro para a democracia: Violência e direito em Hannah Arendt" in História Revista, 26, no. 2 (2021):184-197,
https://doi.org/10.5216/hr.v26i2.68282 . .

Neprijatelj i prekid neprijateljstva. Da li je moguć jedan „srpsko-ruski“ protokol za uspostavljanje mira?

Bojanić, Petar

(Novi Sad: Matica srpska, 2021)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://www.maticasrpska.org.rs/stariSajt/casopisi/ZMSZS_100.pdf
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2465
AB  - U tekstu pretpostavljam da postoji pravoslavna etika rata koja ima svoje posebnosti 
i razlike naspram etike rata na Zapadu. Srpsko-ruski primeri služe da bi rekonstruisali 
neobična razumevanja neprijatelja i neprijateljstva, prekida sukoba, pobede u ratu i odnos 
pobede i mira. Ideja o specifičnom prekidu neprijateljstva i sukoba u pravoslavnom shva tanju rata treba da revidira različite protokole koji nisu dovoljno uspešni u uspostavljanju 
stabilnog i dugotrajnog mira.
AB  - The text assumes that there is a distinct Orthodox war ethics, with its particularities 
and distinctions from Western war ethics. Serbian and Russian examples serve to recon struct unusual understandings of the enemy and enmity, termination of conflict, victory 
in war, as well as the relation of victory and peace. In Orthodox Christianity, the idea of 
a specific termination of enmity and conflict ought to revise various protocols insufficiently successful in establishing stable and long-term peace.
PB  - Novi Sad: Matica srpska
T2  - Zbornik Matice srpske za slavistiku
T1  - Neprijatelj i prekid neprijateljstva. Da li je moguć jedan „srpsko-ruski“ protokol za uspostavljanje mira?
T1  - The Enemy and Termination of Enmity. Is A “Serbo-Russian” Protocol of Peace Possible?
VL  - 100
SP  - 341
EP  - 352
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar",
year = "2021",
abstract = "U tekstu pretpostavljam da postoji pravoslavna etika rata koja ima svoje posebnosti 
i razlike naspram etike rata na Zapadu. Srpsko-ruski primeri služe da bi rekonstruisali 
neobična razumevanja neprijatelja i neprijateljstva, prekida sukoba, pobede u ratu i odnos 
pobede i mira. Ideja o specifičnom prekidu neprijateljstva i sukoba u pravoslavnom shva tanju rata treba da revidira različite protokole koji nisu dovoljno uspešni u uspostavljanju 
stabilnog i dugotrajnog mira., The text assumes that there is a distinct Orthodox war ethics, with its particularities 
and distinctions from Western war ethics. Serbian and Russian examples serve to recon struct unusual understandings of the enemy and enmity, termination of conflict, victory 
in war, as well as the relation of victory and peace. In Orthodox Christianity, the idea of 
a specific termination of enmity and conflict ought to revise various protocols insufficiently successful in establishing stable and long-term peace.",
publisher = "Novi Sad: Matica srpska",
journal = "Zbornik Matice srpske za slavistiku",
title = "Neprijatelj i prekid neprijateljstva. Da li je moguć jedan „srpsko-ruski“ protokol za uspostavljanje mira?, The Enemy and Termination of Enmity. Is A “Serbo-Russian” Protocol of Peace Possible?",
volume = "100",
pages = "341-352"
}
Bojanić, P.. (2021). Neprijatelj i prekid neprijateljstva. Da li je moguć jedan „srpsko-ruski“ protokol za uspostavljanje mira?. in Zbornik Matice srpske za slavistiku
Novi Sad: Matica srpska., 100, 341-352.
Bojanić P. Neprijatelj i prekid neprijateljstva. Da li je moguć jedan „srpsko-ruski“ protokol za uspostavljanje mira?. in Zbornik Matice srpske za slavistiku. 2021;100:341-352..
Bojanić, Petar, "Neprijatelj i prekid neprijateljstva. Da li je moguć jedan „srpsko-ruski“ protokol za uspostavljanje mira?" in Zbornik Matice srpske za slavistiku, 100 (2021):341-352.

Про/вокация. Воззвание и право на переворот

Bojanić, Petar; Боянич, Петар

(Государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования «Белгородский государственный институт искусств и культуры», 2021)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
AU  - Боянич, Петар
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2466
AB  - Мы продолжаем публикацию избранных глав из русской версии перевода 
книги нашего постоянного автора, видного сербского философа мирового масштаба, 
ученика Деррида, Петара Боянича «Про/вокация. Воззвание и право на переворот» 
(Bojanić Petar. PROVOCATIO. Vokativ Ius Revolucija. Belgrade, Službeni glasnik, 2008). 
Книга написана в форме литературно-философского эссе и создана на основе серии 
лекций, прочитанных Петаром Бояничем в Белграде для средств массовой 
информации во второй половине октября 2007 года. Перевод осуществлён 
Войиславом Стояновичем и Викторией Березняк с литературно-философской 
редакцией и примечаниями Виктора Римского и Сергея Борисова. Редакция сохраняет 
авторские постраничные указания на литературу и примечания. 
В книге герменевтически реконструирован древнеримский институт 
провокации, обеспечивавший поддержку подсудимого в административном суде 
путём воззвания к народу и его справедливости.
AB  - We continue to publish selected chapters from the Russian version of the translation 
of the book of our permanent author, a prominent Serbian philosopher of the world scale, a 
disciple of Derrida, Petar Bojanic «Pro / Vocation. The call and the right to coup» (Bojanić
Petar. PROVOCATIO. Vokativ Ius Revolucija. Belgrade, Službeni glasnik, 2008). The book 
is written in the form of a literary-philosophical essay and is based on a series of lectures 
given by Petar Bojanic in Belgrade for the media in the second half of October 2007. The 
translation was carried out by Vojislav Stoyanovich and Victoria Bereznyak with a literary 
and philosophical edition and notes by Viktor Rimsky and Sergei Borisov. The editors keep 
the author's page-by-page references to literature and notes.
The book hermeneutically reconstructs the ancient Roman institution of provocation, 
which provided support for the defendant in the administrative court by appealing to the 
people and their justice.
PB  - Государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования «Белгородский государственный институт искусств и культуры»
T2  - Наука Искусство Культура
T1  - Про/вокация. Воззвание и право на переворот
T1  - Provocation. The Call and The Right To Coup
IS  - 4
VL  - 32
SP  - 46
EP  - 54
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar and Боянич, Петар",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Мы продолжаем публикацию избранных глав из русской версии перевода 
книги нашего постоянного автора, видного сербского философа мирового масштаба, 
ученика Деррида, Петара Боянича «Про/вокация. Воззвание и право на переворот» 
(Bojanić Petar. PROVOCATIO. Vokativ Ius Revolucija. Belgrade, Službeni glasnik, 2008). 
Книга написана в форме литературно-философского эссе и создана на основе серии 
лекций, прочитанных Петаром Бояничем в Белграде для средств массовой 
информации во второй половине октября 2007 года. Перевод осуществлён 
Войиславом Стояновичем и Викторией Березняк с литературно-философской 
редакцией и примечаниями Виктора Римского и Сергея Борисова. Редакция сохраняет 
авторские постраничные указания на литературу и примечания. 
В книге герменевтически реконструирован древнеримский институт 
провокации, обеспечивавший поддержку подсудимого в административном суде 
путём воззвания к народу и его справедливости., We continue to publish selected chapters from the Russian version of the translation 
of the book of our permanent author, a prominent Serbian philosopher of the world scale, a 
disciple of Derrida, Petar Bojanic «Pro / Vocation. The call and the right to coup» (Bojanić
Petar. PROVOCATIO. Vokativ Ius Revolucija. Belgrade, Službeni glasnik, 2008). The book 
is written in the form of a literary-philosophical essay and is based on a series of lectures 
given by Petar Bojanic in Belgrade for the media in the second half of October 2007. The 
translation was carried out by Vojislav Stoyanovich and Victoria Bereznyak with a literary 
and philosophical edition and notes by Viktor Rimsky and Sergei Borisov. The editors keep 
the author's page-by-page references to literature and notes.
The book hermeneutically reconstructs the ancient Roman institution of provocation, 
which provided support for the defendant in the administrative court by appealing to the 
people and their justice.",
publisher = "Государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования «Белгородский государственный институт искусств и культуры»",
journal = "Наука Искусство Культура",
title = "Про/вокация. Воззвание и право на переворот, Provocation. The Call and The Right To Coup",
number = "4",
volume = "32",
pages = "46-54"
}
Bojanić, P.,& Боянич, П.. (2021). Про/вокация. Воззвание и право на переворот. in Наука Искусство Культура
Государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования «Белгородский государственный институт искусств и культуры»., 32(4), 46-54.
Bojanić P, Боянич П. Про/вокация. Воззвание и право на переворот. in Наука Искусство Культура. 2021;32(4):46-54..
Bojanić, Petar, Боянич, Петар, "Про/вокация. Воззвание и право на переворот" in Наука Искусство Культура, 32, no. 4 (2021):46-54.

What Is 'Victory' in the Orthodox Christian Ethics of War?

Bojanić, Petar

(Vienna: Axia Academic Publishers, 2021)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://www.axiapublishers.com/ojs/index.php/labyrinth/article/view/269/172
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2481
AB  - The text reconstructs the protocol of 'victory' as part of the interruption of enmity and establishment of temporary peace. Different understandings of the enemy and enmity imply that victory in war and cessation of conflict can essentially determine the way war is conducted, and that they follow rules of war.  Victory  is  supposed  to  be  a  crucial  moment  that  characterizes  the  ethics  of  war.  Particular testimonies  and  thematizations  of  victory  in  the  Orthodox  Christian  tradition  can  provide  an  intro-duction  into  a  potential  ethics  of  war  that  could  ensure  a  new  relationship  towards  the  enemy  and killing the enemy.
PB  - Vienna: Axia Academic Publishers
T2  - Labyrinth
T1  - What Is 'Victory' in the Orthodox Christian Ethics of War?
IS  - 2
VL  - 23
SP  - 130
EP  - 144
DO  - 10.25180/lj
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar",
year = "2021",
abstract = "The text reconstructs the protocol of 'victory' as part of the interruption of enmity and establishment of temporary peace. Different understandings of the enemy and enmity imply that victory in war and cessation of conflict can essentially determine the way war is conducted, and that they follow rules of war.  Victory  is  supposed  to  be  a  crucial  moment  that  characterizes  the  ethics  of  war.  Particular testimonies  and  thematizations  of  victory  in  the  Orthodox  Christian  tradition  can  provide  an  intro-duction  into  a  potential  ethics  of  war  that  could  ensure  a  new  relationship  towards  the  enemy  and killing the enemy.",
publisher = "Vienna: Axia Academic Publishers",
journal = "Labyrinth",
title = "What Is 'Victory' in the Orthodox Christian Ethics of War?",
number = "2",
volume = "23",
pages = "130-144",
doi = "10.25180/lj"
}
Bojanić, P.. (2021). What Is 'Victory' in the Orthodox Christian Ethics of War?. in Labyrinth
Vienna: Axia Academic Publishers., 23(2), 130-144.
https://doi.org/10.25180/lj
Bojanić P. What Is 'Victory' in the Orthodox Christian Ethics of War?. in Labyrinth. 2021;23(2):130-144.
doi:10.25180/lj .
Bojanić, Petar, "What Is 'Victory' in the Orthodox Christian Ethics of War?" in Labyrinth, 23, no. 2 (2021):130-144,
https://doi.org/10.25180/lj . .

“Leben und Gewalt” ou “Gewalt und Leben” Comentário ao §18 De a Crítica Da Violência De Walter Benjamin

Bojanić, Petar

(Universidade Federal de Goiás, 2021)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://www.revistas.ufg.br/teoria/article/view/71176
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2482
AB  - No parágrafo 18 de “A Crítica da Violência”, os 
termos vida, viver e violência, e as relações entre eles, 
complicam a justificativa de Walter Benjamin para a violência 
divina – a principal descoberta de seu texto. Este artigo 
procura reconstruir os usos de Benjamin da vida e vivência em 
textos anteriores e considerar a influência potencial de vários 
autores que ele estava lendo na época (Heinrich Rickert, 
Erich Unger, Kurt Hiller, Gershom Scholem). A distinção 
de Benjamin entre vida e viver é crucial para sua crítica ao 
pacifismo e para sua mudança de perspectiva: ele muda o 
foco da vítima para aquele que comete um assassinato, mas 
cujo ato violento só pode trazer justiça.
AB  - In paragraph 18 of “Toward the Critique of Violence,” the 
terms life, living, and violence, and the relations among them, 
complicate Walter Benjamin's justification of divine 
violence—his text's main discovery. This article seeks to 
reconstruct Benjamin's uses of life and living in earlier texts 
and to consider the potential influence of various authors he 
was reading at the time (Heinrich Rickert, Erich Unger, Kurt 
Hiller, Gershom Scholem). Benjamin's distinction 
between life and living is crucial for his critique of pacifism 
and for his shift in perspective: he moves the focus from the 
victim to the one committing murder, but whose violent act 
just might bring justice.
PB  - Universidade Federal de Goiás
T2  - Revista de Teoria da História
T1  - “Leben und Gewalt” ou “Gewalt und Leben” Comentário ao §18 De a Crítica Da Violência De Walter Benjamin
IS  - 2
VL  - 24
SP  - 54
EP  - 63
DO  - 10.5216/rth.v24i2.71176
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar",
year = "2021",
abstract = "No parágrafo 18 de “A Crítica da Violência”, os 
termos vida, viver e violência, e as relações entre eles, 
complicam a justificativa de Walter Benjamin para a violência 
divina – a principal descoberta de seu texto. Este artigo 
procura reconstruir os usos de Benjamin da vida e vivência em 
textos anteriores e considerar a influência potencial de vários 
autores que ele estava lendo na época (Heinrich Rickert, 
Erich Unger, Kurt Hiller, Gershom Scholem). A distinção 
de Benjamin entre vida e viver é crucial para sua crítica ao 
pacifismo e para sua mudança de perspectiva: ele muda o 
foco da vítima para aquele que comete um assassinato, mas 
cujo ato violento só pode trazer justiça., In paragraph 18 of “Toward the Critique of Violence,” the 
terms life, living, and violence, and the relations among them, 
complicate Walter Benjamin's justification of divine 
violence—his text's main discovery. This article seeks to 
reconstruct Benjamin's uses of life and living in earlier texts 
and to consider the potential influence of various authors he 
was reading at the time (Heinrich Rickert, Erich Unger, Kurt 
Hiller, Gershom Scholem). Benjamin's distinction 
between life and living is crucial for his critique of pacifism 
and for his shift in perspective: he moves the focus from the 
victim to the one committing murder, but whose violent act 
just might bring justice.",
publisher = "Universidade Federal de Goiás",
journal = "Revista de Teoria da História",
title = "“Leben und Gewalt” ou “Gewalt und Leben” Comentário ao §18 De a Crítica Da Violência De Walter Benjamin",
number = "2",
volume = "24",
pages = "54-63",
doi = "10.5216/rth.v24i2.71176"
}
Bojanić, P.. (2021). “Leben und Gewalt” ou “Gewalt und Leben” Comentário ao §18 De a Crítica Da Violência De Walter Benjamin. in Revista de Teoria da História
Universidade Federal de Goiás., 24(2), 54-63.
https://doi.org/10.5216/rth.v24i2.71176
Bojanić P. “Leben und Gewalt” ou “Gewalt und Leben” Comentário ao §18 De a Crítica Da Violência De Walter Benjamin. in Revista de Teoria da História. 2021;24(2):54-63.
doi:10.5216/rth.v24i2.71176 .
Bojanić, Petar, "“Leben und Gewalt” ou “Gewalt und Leben” Comentário ao §18 De a Crítica Da Violência De Walter Benjamin" in Revista de Teoria da História, 24, no. 2 (2021):54-63,
https://doi.org/10.5216/rth.v24i2.71176 . .

The Messiness of Victory and Heroism: A Brief Response to Carl Schmitt

Bojanić, Petar; Đorđević, Edward

(Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2021)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
AU  - Đorđević, Edward
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/fid/article/view/1376
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2491
AB  - The article focuses on a passage from Carl Schmitt’s Ex Captivitate Salus – a book famously written in a Nurnberg prison in 1946 – in which he draws, from memory, on a story derived from Serbian epic poetry, to justify his understanding of historiography, victory, and the figure of the hero. Analyzing the entire Serbian epic poem from which Schmitt extracts the vignette in question, we show how the text of the poem presents a significantly more complicated and messy picture of the figures of victor, victory, and hero, heroism. The anonymous Serbian poet, addressing himself to his contemporary audience, with which he is intimately familiar, really subverts simplistic expectations regarding the heroism and victory of the Serbian hero, Marko Kraljević. Finally, the article contrasts these complex and at times paradoxical figures of victory and the hero in the poem with their presentation in Carl Schmitt’s writing.
AB  - U članku se dovodi u pitanje jedan pasus iz knjige Ex Captivitate Salus, Karla Šmita – knjige 
koja je, kao što je poznato, pisana u nirnberškom zatvoru u Nemačkoj, 1946. godine. U tom 
pasusu se Šmit oslanja na detalj iz srpske narodne epske pesme kako bi argumentovao svoje 
razumevanje istoriografije, pobede i figure junaka. Analizirajući celu pesmu Marko Kraljević 
i Musa Kesedžija, iz koje Šmit preuzima anegdotu o junaku Marku, u članku se ukazuje na to 
da su koncepti pobede, pobednika, junaka i junaštva u samoj pesmi znatno komplikovaniji i 
neuredniji od one koju Šmit predstavlja. Obraćajući se publici koju vrlo dobro poznaje, srpski 
pevač podriva pojednostavljena očekivanja o junaštvu i pobedi srpskog junaka, Marka Kraljevića. Članak zaključuje da je ova komplikovana slika iz same pesme daleko od pojednostavljene i manipulativne slike koju nudi Šmit.
PB  - Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - The Messiness of Victory and Heroism: A Brief Response to Carl Schmitt
T1  - Neurednost pobede i junaštva. Kratak odgovor Karlu Šmitu
IS  - 4
VL  - 32
SP  - 662
EP  - 673
DO  - 10.2298/FID2104662B
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar and Đorđević, Edward",
year = "2021",
abstract = "The article focuses on a passage from Carl Schmitt’s Ex Captivitate Salus – a book famously written in a Nurnberg prison in 1946 – in which he draws, from memory, on a story derived from Serbian epic poetry, to justify his understanding of historiography, victory, and the figure of the hero. Analyzing the entire Serbian epic poem from which Schmitt extracts the vignette in question, we show how the text of the poem presents a significantly more complicated and messy picture of the figures of victor, victory, and hero, heroism. The anonymous Serbian poet, addressing himself to his contemporary audience, with which he is intimately familiar, really subverts simplistic expectations regarding the heroism and victory of the Serbian hero, Marko Kraljević. Finally, the article contrasts these complex and at times paradoxical figures of victory and the hero in the poem with their presentation in Carl Schmitt’s writing., U članku se dovodi u pitanje jedan pasus iz knjige Ex Captivitate Salus, Karla Šmita – knjige 
koja je, kao što je poznato, pisana u nirnberškom zatvoru u Nemačkoj, 1946. godine. U tom 
pasusu se Šmit oslanja na detalj iz srpske narodne epske pesme kako bi argumentovao svoje 
razumevanje istoriografije, pobede i figure junaka. Analizirajući celu pesmu Marko Kraljević 
i Musa Kesedžija, iz koje Šmit preuzima anegdotu o junaku Marku, u članku se ukazuje na to 
da su koncepti pobede, pobednika, junaka i junaštva u samoj pesmi znatno komplikovaniji i 
neuredniji od one koju Šmit predstavlja. Obraćajući se publici koju vrlo dobro poznaje, srpski 
pevač podriva pojednostavljena očekivanja o junaštvu i pobedi srpskog junaka, Marka Kraljevića. Članak zaključuje da je ova komplikovana slika iz same pesme daleko od pojednostavljene i manipulativne slike koju nudi Šmit.",
publisher = "Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "The Messiness of Victory and Heroism: A Brief Response to Carl Schmitt, Neurednost pobede i junaštva. Kratak odgovor Karlu Šmitu",
number = "4",
volume = "32",
pages = "662-673",
doi = "10.2298/FID2104662B"
}
Bojanić, P.,& Đorđević, E.. (2021). The Messiness of Victory and Heroism: A Brief Response to Carl Schmitt. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 32(4), 662-673.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2104662B
Bojanić P, Đorđević E. The Messiness of Victory and Heroism: A Brief Response to Carl Schmitt. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2021;32(4):662-673.
doi:10.2298/FID2104662B .
Bojanić, Petar, Đorđević, Edward, "The Messiness of Victory and Heroism: A Brief Response to Carl Schmitt" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 32, no. 4 (2021):662-673,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2104662B . .

The Vocabulary of Distance

Bojanić, Petar; Bojanić, Sanja

(Frankfurt am Main : Verlag Vittorio Klosterman, 2020)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
AU  - Bojanić, Sanja
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2244
PB  - Frankfurt am Main : Verlag Vittorio Klosterman
T2  - In the Realm of Corona Normativities: A Momentary Snapshot of a Dynamic Discourse
T1  - The Vocabulary of Distance
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Bojanić, Petar and Bojanić, Sanja",
year = "2020",
publisher = "Frankfurt am Main : Verlag Vittorio Klosterman",
journal = "In the Realm of Corona Normativities: A Momentary Snapshot of a Dynamic Discourse",
booktitle = "The Vocabulary of Distance"
}
Bojanić, P.,& Bojanić, S.. (2020). The Vocabulary of Distance. in In the Realm of Corona Normativities: A Momentary Snapshot of a Dynamic Discourse
Frankfurt am Main : Verlag Vittorio Klosterman..
Bojanić P, Bojanić S. The Vocabulary of Distance. in In the Realm of Corona Normativities: A Momentary Snapshot of a Dynamic Discourse. 2020;..
Bojanić, Petar, Bojanić, Sanja, "The Vocabulary of Distance" in In the Realm of Corona Normativities: A Momentary Snapshot of a Dynamic Discourse (2020).

Violence And “Counter Violence”. On Correct Rejection (A Sketch of a Possible Russian Ethics of War Considered through the Understanding of Violence in Tolstoy and in Petar II Petrović Njegoš

Bojanić, Petar

(Москва: Российский университет дружбы народов, 2020)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2119
PB  - Москва: Российский университет дружбы народов
T2  - RUDN Journal of Philosophy
T1  - Violence And “Counter Violence”. On Correct Rejection (A Sketch of a Possible Russian Ethics of War Considered through the Understanding of Violence in Tolstoy  and in Petar II Petrović Njegoš
T1  - Насилие и противонасилие. О правильном отказе от насилия (Очерк возможной русской этики войны на основании понимания насилия Л. Толстым и Петаром Петровичем Ньегошем)
IS  - 4
VL  - 24
SP  - 657
EP  - 668
DO  - 10.22363/2313-2302-2020-24-4-657-668
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar",
year = "2020",
publisher = "Москва: Российский университет дружбы народов",
journal = "RUDN Journal of Philosophy",
title = "Violence And “Counter Violence”. On Correct Rejection (A Sketch of a Possible Russian Ethics of War Considered through the Understanding of Violence in Tolstoy  and in Petar II Petrović Njegoš, Насилие и противонасилие. О правильном отказе от насилия (Очерк возможной русской этики войны на основании понимания насилия Л. Толстым и Петаром Петровичем Ньегошем)",
number = "4",
volume = "24",
pages = "657-668",
doi = "10.22363/2313-2302-2020-24-4-657-668"
}
Bojanić, P.. (2020). Violence And “Counter Violence”. On Correct Rejection (A Sketch of a Possible Russian Ethics of War Considered through the Understanding of Violence in Tolstoy  and in Petar II Petrović Njegoš. in RUDN Journal of Philosophy
Москва: Российский университет дружбы народов., 24(4), 657-668.
https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2020-24-4-657-668
Bojanić P. Violence And “Counter Violence”. On Correct Rejection (A Sketch of a Possible Russian Ethics of War Considered through the Understanding of Violence in Tolstoy  and in Petar II Petrović Njegoš. in RUDN Journal of Philosophy. 2020;24(4):657-668.
doi:10.22363/2313-2302-2020-24-4-657-668 .
Bojanić, Petar, "Violence And “Counter Violence”. On Correct Rejection (A Sketch of a Possible Russian Ethics of War Considered through the Understanding of Violence in Tolstoy  and in Petar II Petrović Njegoš" in RUDN Journal of Philosophy, 24, no. 4 (2020):657-668,
https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2020-24-4-657-668 . .

Ангажированный акт как условие (философского) сообщества

Bojanić, Petar; Borisov, Sergey N.

(Москва : Российская академия наук институт философии ран, 2020)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
AU  - Borisov, Sergey N.
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2104
AB  - Представленный текст – начало проекта группы, основанной в Белграде
в Институте философии и социальной теории для исследований ангажированности. Нас интересует, как себя ведет французское слово engagement
в русском языке. Предварительное определение нашей позиции и основной
гипотезы заключается в нескольких положениях: во-первых, нас интересуют именно акты, или акции, в результате которых что-то происходит,
а не факты, объекты, последствия или результаты этих актов. Нам важно
знать, как строится общество или как индивиды сближаются и держатся
вместе. Мы считаем, что существуют акты, или группы актов, которые работают или не работают. Второе, мы пытаемся выделить акты, результатом
которых становятся институты, а не только группы, общества или сообщества. Мы полагаем, что без участия так называемых «ангажированных актов», чье определение мы хотим дать в нашем тексте, не существуют институты как таковые или сильные и стабильные институты. Ангажированные
акты наделяют институты законным статусом и укрепляют их. И третье,
в случае философских сообществ мы сталкиваемся с проблематичностью
именно ангажированных актов и большей исправностью актов институциональных, что определяет некоторую специфику философских сообществ.
AB  - The text presented is the beginning of a project of a group based in Belgrade
at the Institute of Philosophy and Social Theory for Engagement Studies. We are
interested in how the French word engagement behaves in Russian. A preliminary definition of our position and the main hypothesis consists of several provisions: first, we are interested in the acts or actions, as a result of which something happens, and not the facts, objects, consequences or results of these acts.
It is important for us to know how a society is built or how individuals come together and hold together. We believe that there are acts, or groups of acts that
work or do not work. Second, we are trying to highlight the acts that result in institutions, and not just groups, societies or communities. We believe that without
the participation of the so-called “biased acts”, whose definition we want to give
in our text, there are no institutions as such or strong and stable institutions. Engaged acts give institutions legal status and strengthen them. And the third,
in the case of philosophical communities, we are faced with the problematic nature of biased acts and greater operability of institutional acts, which determines
some specifics of philosophical communities.
PB  - Москва : Российская академия наук институт философии ран
T2  - Вопросы философии
T1  - Ангажированный акт как условие (философского) сообщества
T1  - An Engaged Act as a Condition of a (Philosophical) Community
IS  - 10
SP  - 104
EP  - 110
DO  - 10.21146/0042‒8744‒2020‒10-104-109
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar and Borisov, Sergey N.",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Представленный текст – начало проекта группы, основанной в Белграде
в Институте философии и социальной теории для исследований ангажированности. Нас интересует, как себя ведет французское слово engagement
в русском языке. Предварительное определение нашей позиции и основной
гипотезы заключается в нескольких положениях: во-первых, нас интересуют именно акты, или акции, в результате которых что-то происходит,
а не факты, объекты, последствия или результаты этих актов. Нам важно
знать, как строится общество или как индивиды сближаются и держатся
вместе. Мы считаем, что существуют акты, или группы актов, которые работают или не работают. Второе, мы пытаемся выделить акты, результатом
которых становятся институты, а не только группы, общества или сообщества. Мы полагаем, что без участия так называемых «ангажированных актов», чье определение мы хотим дать в нашем тексте, не существуют институты как таковые или сильные и стабильные институты. Ангажированные
акты наделяют институты законным статусом и укрепляют их. И третье,
в случае философских сообществ мы сталкиваемся с проблематичностью
именно ангажированных актов и большей исправностью актов институциональных, что определяет некоторую специфику философских сообществ., The text presented is the beginning of a project of a group based in Belgrade
at the Institute of Philosophy and Social Theory for Engagement Studies. We are
interested in how the French word engagement behaves in Russian. A preliminary definition of our position and the main hypothesis consists of several provisions: first, we are interested in the acts or actions, as a result of which something happens, and not the facts, objects, consequences or results of these acts.
It is important for us to know how a society is built or how individuals come together and hold together. We believe that there are acts, or groups of acts that
work or do not work. Second, we are trying to highlight the acts that result in institutions, and not just groups, societies or communities. We believe that without
the participation of the so-called “biased acts”, whose definition we want to give
in our text, there are no institutions as such or strong and stable institutions. Engaged acts give institutions legal status and strengthen them. And the third,
in the case of philosophical communities, we are faced with the problematic nature of biased acts and greater operability of institutional acts, which determines
some specifics of philosophical communities.",
publisher = "Москва : Российская академия наук институт философии ран",
journal = "Вопросы философии",
title = "Ангажированный акт как условие (философского) сообщества, An Engaged Act as a Condition of a (Philosophical) Community",
number = "10",
pages = "104-110",
doi = "10.21146/0042‒8744‒2020‒10-104-109"
}
Bojanić, P.,& Borisov, S. N.. (2020). Ангажированный акт как условие (философского) сообщества. in Вопросы философии
Москва : Российская академия наук институт философии ран.(10), 104-110.
https://doi.org/10.21146/0042‒8744‒2020‒10-104-109
Bojanić P, Borisov SN. Ангажированный акт как условие (философского) сообщества. in Вопросы философии. 2020;(10):104-110.
doi:10.21146/0042‒8744‒2020‒10-104-109 .
Bojanić, Petar, Borisov, Sergey N., "Ангажированный акт как условие (философского) сообщества" in Вопросы философии, no. 10 (2020):104-110,
https://doi.org/10.21146/0042‒8744‒2020‒10-104-109 . .

What Is an Act of Engagement? Between the Social, Collegial and Institutional Protocols

Bojanić, Petar

(Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2020)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2060
AB  - Engagement is not synonymous with commitment, even though both words are used in translations between English, French, and German. However, engagement is also not some supplementary phenomenon or a technical term that the phrase social acts already includes in itself or that the concepts of ‘commitment’ or ‘joint commitment’ somehow necessarily imply. In this article I would like to describe a special kind of social act and determine the function they have in relation between various agents. Most importantly, I would like to define their significance in the transformation of a group into an institution or higher order entity. My premise is that there are acts whose aim is to engage all others, since they refer to all of us together, and in so doing reduce negative (social) “acts” as well as various asocial behaviors within a group or institution. In this sense, engaged acts could alternatively also belong to a kind of institutional act, since they introduce certain adjustments to the institution, changing or modifying its rules, increasing its consistency and efficiency.
PB  - Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG
T2  - Institutions in Action. The Nature and the Role of Institutions in the Real World
T1  - What Is an Act of Engagement? Between the Social, Collegial and Institutional Protocols
VL  - 12
SP  - 37
EP  - 51
DO  - 10.1007/978-3-030-32618-0_4
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Bojanić, Petar",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Engagement is not synonymous with commitment, even though both words are used in translations between English, French, and German. However, engagement is also not some supplementary phenomenon or a technical term that the phrase social acts already includes in itself or that the concepts of ‘commitment’ or ‘joint commitment’ somehow necessarily imply. In this article I would like to describe a special kind of social act and determine the function they have in relation between various agents. Most importantly, I would like to define their significance in the transformation of a group into an institution or higher order entity. My premise is that there are acts whose aim is to engage all others, since they refer to all of us together, and in so doing reduce negative (social) “acts” as well as various asocial behaviors within a group or institution. In this sense, engaged acts could alternatively also belong to a kind of institutional act, since they introduce certain adjustments to the institution, changing or modifying its rules, increasing its consistency and efficiency.",
publisher = "Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG",
journal = "Institutions in Action. The Nature and the Role of Institutions in the Real World",
booktitle = "What Is an Act of Engagement? Between the Social, Collegial and Institutional Protocols",
volume = "12",
pages = "37-51",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-32618-0_4"
}
Bojanić, P.. (2020). What Is an Act of Engagement? Between the Social, Collegial and Institutional Protocols. in Institutions in Action. The Nature and the Role of Institutions in the Real World
Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG., 12, 37-51.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32618-0_4
Bojanić P. What Is an Act of Engagement? Between the Social, Collegial and Institutional Protocols. in Institutions in Action. The Nature and the Role of Institutions in the Real World. 2020;12:37-51.
doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32618-0_4 .
Bojanić, Petar, "What Is an Act of Engagement? Between the Social, Collegial and Institutional Protocols" in Institutions in Action. The Nature and the Role of Institutions in the Real World, 12 (2020):37-51,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32618-0_4 . .

Violence and “Counter Violence”. On Correct Rejection. A Sketch of a Possible Russian Ethics of War Considered through the Understanding of Violence in Tolstoy and in Petar II Petrović Njegoš

Bojanić, Petar

(Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 2020)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/25012/18772
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2182
AB  - The article’s intention is to construct a possible minimal response to violence, 
that is, to describe what would be justified (necessary or legitimate) “противонасилие” 
(counter-violence). This argument is built on reviving several important philosophical texts in 
Russian of the first half of the twentieth century as well as on going beyond that historical 
moment. Starting with the reconstruction of Tolstoy’s criticism of any use of violence, it is then 
shown that, paradoxically, resistance to Tolstoy’s or ‘pseudo’—Tolstoy’s teachings ends up 
incorporating Tolstoy’s thematization of counter-violence into various theories, which sought 
to legitimate the use of force. In particular, Tolstoy’s discovery of a force, which, on the one 
hand, is not grounded in violence and, on the other hand, which is capable of countering 
violence, becomes fundamental in reasoning about the just use of force. The connection is made 
between Tolstoy and Petar II Petrović Njegoš, who also thematizes the use of force in Christian 
perspective. In his view, justice, “blessed by the Creator’s hand,” has the capacity to protect 
from violent force. Any living thing defends itself from what endangers it by means Creator 
bestowed it with. Living force and protective use of force are conceptually linked in Njegoš’s 
reasoning. Thus, only protective force can defeat aggressive force. This is shown to be Njegoš’s 
contribution to the Orthodox Christian discourse on violence. If a force can be counter-violent, 
the next step in our argument would be to search for a protocol that should have universal 
validity, that is, it has to be valid for all conflicting sides, The protocol of counter-violence 
requires that, firstly, it is a response to violence; secondly, it interrupts violence and forestalls 
any possible future violence (it is the ‘last’ violence); thirdly, it is subject to verification, it 
addresses those who are a priori against any response to violence (which usually refers to 
various forms of “Tolstoyism”).
AB  - Цель статьи заключается в построении возможного минимального ответа на наси лие, иными словами, в описании того, что было бы оправданным (необходимым или 
законным) «противонасилием». Этот аргумент основан на реконструкции нескольких 
важных философских текстов на русском языке первой половины ХХ века, а также на 
расширении анализа проблемы за пределы этого исторического момента. После рекон струкции критики Л. Толстым любого применения насилия показывается, что, как это ни 
парадоксально, противники учения Толстого включили разработанную Толстым идею 
противонасилия в свои теории, в которых стремились легитимизировать применение 
силы. В частности, открытие Толстым силы, которая, с одной стороны, не основана на 
насилии, а, с другой стороны, способна противостоять насилию, становится основопола гающим в рассуждениях о справедливом применении силы. Далее выстраивается связь 
между Л. Толстым и Петаром II Петровичем Ньегошем, который также тематизирует 
применение силы в христианской перспективе. По его мнению, справедливость, «благо словенная рукой Творца», способна защитить от насильственной силы. Любое живое 
существо защищается от того, что ему угрожает теми средствами, которыми его одарил 
Творец. Живая сила и защитное применение силы концептуально связываются в рассуж дениях Ньегоша. Таким образом, только защищающая сила может победить агрессивную 
силу. Это свидетельствует о вкладе Ньегоша в православный христианский дискурс 
о насилии. Если сила может быть противонасильственной, следующим шагом в нашем 
аргументе будет поиск протокола, который должен иметь универсальную силу, то есть 
он должен быть действительным для всех конфликтующих сторон. Протокол о борьбе с 
насилием требует, чтобы, во-первых, сила была ответом на насилие; во-вторых, преры вала насилие и предотвращала любое возможное насилие в будущем (это «последнее» 
насилие); в-третьих, применение силы подлежит проверке, обращено к тем, кто априори
против любой ответ на насилие (что обычно относится к различным формам «толстов ства»). Наконец, показано, что государственная власть не создает закон, а лишь правота 
создает закон, дает жизнь общественному порядку и тем самым может санкционировать 
применение силы. Это новшество в истории оправдания силы, отсутствующее на Западе. 
Агрессивному насилию может быть противопоставлена лишь та сила, которая предпола гает возможность установления закона и порядка.
PB  - Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
T2  - Вестник РУДН. Серия "Философия
T1  - Violence and “Counter Violence”.  On Correct Rejection.  A Sketch of a Possible Russian Ethics of War Considered  through the Understanding of Violence in Tolstoy   and in Petar II Petrović Njegoš
T1  - Насилие и противонасилие.  О правильном отказе от насилия  (Очерк возможной русской этики войны  на основании понимания насилия Л. Толстым  и Петаром Петровичем Ньегошем)
IS  - 4
VL  - 24
SP  - 657
EP  - 668
DO  - 10.22363/2313-2302-2020-24-4-657-668
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar",
year = "2020",
abstract = "The article’s intention is to construct a possible minimal response to violence, 
that is, to describe what would be justified (necessary or legitimate) “противонасилие” 
(counter-violence). This argument is built on reviving several important philosophical texts in 
Russian of the first half of the twentieth century as well as on going beyond that historical 
moment. Starting with the reconstruction of Tolstoy’s criticism of any use of violence, it is then 
shown that, paradoxically, resistance to Tolstoy’s or ‘pseudo’—Tolstoy’s teachings ends up 
incorporating Tolstoy’s thematization of counter-violence into various theories, which sought 
to legitimate the use of force. In particular, Tolstoy’s discovery of a force, which, on the one 
hand, is not grounded in violence and, on the other hand, which is capable of countering 
violence, becomes fundamental in reasoning about the just use of force. The connection is made 
between Tolstoy and Petar II Petrović Njegoš, who also thematizes the use of force in Christian 
perspective. In his view, justice, “blessed by the Creator’s hand,” has the capacity to protect 
from violent force. Any living thing defends itself from what endangers it by means Creator 
bestowed it with. Living force and protective use of force are conceptually linked in Njegoš’s 
reasoning. Thus, only protective force can defeat aggressive force. This is shown to be Njegoš’s 
contribution to the Orthodox Christian discourse on violence. If a force can be counter-violent, 
the next step in our argument would be to search for a protocol that should have universal 
validity, that is, it has to be valid for all conflicting sides, The protocol of counter-violence 
requires that, firstly, it is a response to violence; secondly, it interrupts violence and forestalls 
any possible future violence (it is the ‘last’ violence); thirdly, it is subject to verification, it 
addresses those who are a priori against any response to violence (which usually refers to 
various forms of “Tolstoyism”)., Цель статьи заключается в построении возможного минимального ответа на наси лие, иными словами, в описании того, что было бы оправданным (необходимым или 
законным) «противонасилием». Этот аргумент основан на реконструкции нескольких 
важных философских текстов на русском языке первой половины ХХ века, а также на 
расширении анализа проблемы за пределы этого исторического момента. После рекон струкции критики Л. Толстым любого применения насилия показывается, что, как это ни 
парадоксально, противники учения Толстого включили разработанную Толстым идею 
противонасилия в свои теории, в которых стремились легитимизировать применение 
силы. В частности, открытие Толстым силы, которая, с одной стороны, не основана на 
насилии, а, с другой стороны, способна противостоять насилию, становится основопола гающим в рассуждениях о справедливом применении силы. Далее выстраивается связь 
между Л. Толстым и Петаром II Петровичем Ньегошем, который также тематизирует 
применение силы в христианской перспективе. По его мнению, справедливость, «благо словенная рукой Творца», способна защитить от насильственной силы. Любое живое 
существо защищается от того, что ему угрожает теми средствами, которыми его одарил 
Творец. Живая сила и защитное применение силы концептуально связываются в рассуж дениях Ньегоша. Таким образом, только защищающая сила может победить агрессивную 
силу. Это свидетельствует о вкладе Ньегоша в православный христианский дискурс 
о насилии. Если сила может быть противонасильственной, следующим шагом в нашем 
аргументе будет поиск протокола, который должен иметь универсальную силу, то есть 
он должен быть действительным для всех конфликтующих сторон. Протокол о борьбе с 
насилием требует, чтобы, во-первых, сила была ответом на насилие; во-вторых, преры вала насилие и предотвращала любое возможное насилие в будущем (это «последнее» 
насилие); в-третьих, применение силы подлежит проверке, обращено к тем, кто априори
против любой ответ на насилие (что обычно относится к различным формам «толстов ства»). Наконец, показано, что государственная власть не создает закон, а лишь правота 
создает закон, дает жизнь общественному порядку и тем самым может санкционировать 
применение силы. Это новшество в истории оправдания силы, отсутствующее на Западе. 
Агрессивному насилию может быть противопоставлена лишь та сила, которая предпола гает возможность установления закона и порядка.",
publisher = "Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)",
journal = "Вестник РУДН. Серия "Философия",
title = "Violence and “Counter Violence”.  On Correct Rejection.  A Sketch of a Possible Russian Ethics of War Considered  through the Understanding of Violence in Tolstoy   and in Petar II Petrović Njegoš, Насилие и противонасилие.  О правильном отказе от насилия  (Очерк возможной русской этики войны  на основании понимания насилия Л. Толстым  и Петаром Петровичем Ньегошем)",
number = "4",
volume = "24",
pages = "657-668",
doi = "10.22363/2313-2302-2020-24-4-657-668"
}
Bojanić, P.. (2020). Violence and “Counter Violence”.  On Correct Rejection.  A Sketch of a Possible Russian Ethics of War Considered  through the Understanding of Violence in Tolstoy   and in Petar II Petrović Njegoš. in Вестник РУДН. Серия "Философия
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)., 24(4), 657-668.
https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2020-24-4-657-668
Bojanić P. Violence and “Counter Violence”.  On Correct Rejection.  A Sketch of a Possible Russian Ethics of War Considered  through the Understanding of Violence in Tolstoy   and in Petar II Petrović Njegoš. in Вестник РУДН. Серия "Философия. 2020;24(4):657-668.
doi:10.22363/2313-2302-2020-24-4-657-668 .
Bojanić, Petar, "Violence and “Counter Violence”.  On Correct Rejection.  A Sketch of a Possible Russian Ethics of War Considered  through the Understanding of Violence in Tolstoy   and in Petar II Petrović Njegoš" in Вестник РУДН. Серия "Философия, 24, no. 4 (2020):657-668,
https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2020-24-4-657-668 . .

Foreword: Inclusion/Exclusion—On the Conditions of Common or Critical Engagement

Bojanić, Petar

(London : Palgrave Macmillan, 2020)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2232
PB  - London : Palgrave Macmillan
T2  - Rethinking Vulnerability and Exclusion. Historical and Critical Essays
T1  - Foreword: Inclusion/Exclusion—On the  Conditions of Common or Critical  Engagement
SP  - 5
EP  - 12
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Bojanić, Petar",
year = "2020",
publisher = "London : Palgrave Macmillan",
journal = "Rethinking Vulnerability and Exclusion. Historical and Critical Essays",
booktitle = "Foreword: Inclusion/Exclusion—On the  Conditions of Common or Critical  Engagement",
pages = "5-12"
}
Bojanić, P.. (2020). Foreword: Inclusion/Exclusion—On the  Conditions of Common or Critical  Engagement. in Rethinking Vulnerability and Exclusion. Historical and Critical Essays
London : Palgrave Macmillan., 5-12.
Bojanić P. Foreword: Inclusion/Exclusion—On the  Conditions of Common or Critical  Engagement. in Rethinking Vulnerability and Exclusion. Historical and Critical Essays. 2020;:5-12..
Bojanić, Petar, "Foreword: Inclusion/Exclusion—On the  Conditions of Common or Critical  Engagement" in Rethinking Vulnerability and Exclusion. Historical and Critical Essays (2020):5-12.

Primeira cena de construção institucional: incorporatio babilônico

Bojanić, Petar

(Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, 2020)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://www.revistafenix.pro.br/revistafenix
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2181
AB  - A partir da exposição realizada na Dickson Poon School of Law do King's College London 
(2016/2017) pelo artista e professor alemão da Universidade de Bonn, Werner Gephart, propõe-se aqui 
análise da obra “Produção babilônica de normatividade na Europa (2016)”, em diálogo com “A Torre de 
Babel”, de 1563 do artista belga Pieter Bruegel, o Velho, ambas cotejadas com os textos religiosos com 
os quais dialogam, com vistas a compreender as analogias feitas pelo autor da obra com história atual da 
Europa, sua unificação e os seus tantos dilemas mais contemporâneos.
AB  - Based on the exhibition held at the Dickson Poon School of Law at King's College London 
(2016/2017) by the German artist and professor at the University of Bonn, Werner Gephart, we propose 
here an analysis of the work “Babylonian production of norms in Europe (2016) ”, In dialogue with“ The 
Tower of Babel ”, from 1563 by the Belgian artist Pieter Bruegel the Elder, both collated with the
religious texts with which they dialogue, in order to understand the analogies made by the author of the 
work with current European history , its unification and its many more contemporary dilemmas.
PB  - Universidade Federal de Uberlândia
T2  - Fênix: revista de história e estudos culturais
T1  - Primeira cena de construção institucional: incorporatio babilônico
T1  - First Scene of Institutional Building: Babylon Incorporatio
IS  - 2
VL  - 17
SP  - 37
EP  - 48
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar",
year = "2020",
abstract = "A partir da exposição realizada na Dickson Poon School of Law do King's College London 
(2016/2017) pelo artista e professor alemão da Universidade de Bonn, Werner Gephart, propõe-se aqui 
análise da obra “Produção babilônica de normatividade na Europa (2016)”, em diálogo com “A Torre de 
Babel”, de 1563 do artista belga Pieter Bruegel, o Velho, ambas cotejadas com os textos religiosos com 
os quais dialogam, com vistas a compreender as analogias feitas pelo autor da obra com história atual da 
Europa, sua unificação e os seus tantos dilemas mais contemporâneos., Based on the exhibition held at the Dickson Poon School of Law at King's College London 
(2016/2017) by the German artist and professor at the University of Bonn, Werner Gephart, we propose 
here an analysis of the work “Babylonian production of norms in Europe (2016) ”, In dialogue with“ The 
Tower of Babel ”, from 1563 by the Belgian artist Pieter Bruegel the Elder, both collated with the
religious texts with which they dialogue, in order to understand the analogies made by the author of the 
work with current European history , its unification and its many more contemporary dilemmas.",
publisher = "Universidade Federal de Uberlândia",
journal = "Fênix: revista de história e estudos culturais",
title = "Primeira cena de construção institucional: incorporatio babilônico, First Scene of Institutional Building: Babylon Incorporatio",
number = "2",
volume = "17",
pages = "37-48"
}
Bojanić, P.. (2020). Primeira cena de construção institucional: incorporatio babilônico. in Fênix: revista de história e estudos culturais
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia., 17(2), 37-48.
Bojanić P. Primeira cena de construção institucional: incorporatio babilônico. in Fênix: revista de história e estudos culturais. 2020;17(2):37-48..
Bojanić, Petar, "Primeira cena de construção institucional: incorporatio babilônico" in Fênix: revista de história e estudos culturais, 17, no. 2 (2020):37-48.

A Violência Divina de Benjamin e o Caso de Coré – A Rebelião contra Moisés Como Primeira Cena do Messianismo (Números, 16)1

Bojanić, Petar

(Instituto Brasiliense de Direito Público – IDP, 2020)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://www.portaldeperiodicos.idp.edu.br/direitopublico/issue/view/213/showToc
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2180
AB  - Inicialmente, para justificar uma leitura suplementar da Crítica da vio lência de Benjamin, eu gostaria de apresentar as formas pelas quais esse tex to foi recebido e explicar as razões por trás da rica história de suas recons truções, que vão de Scholem e Löwenthal, até Honneth, Žižek e Butler. O 
que é que produz a “força desconstrutiva” dessa colagem densa e complexa 
de textos? Não é apenas a brilhante montagem de Benjamin, mas, tam bém, parece-me, esse poderoso mal-entendido que se dissimula no título 
de meu texto: A violência divina de Benjamin e o caso de Coré. Gostaria, 
então, de completar imediatamente essa analogia entre a violência divi na e o nome de Coré com duas anotações que devem limitar e complicar 
toda interpretação suplementar: (a) diferentemente de Leo Löwenthal (1990, 
p. 174), tratarei o texto de Benjamin como uma soma de figuras e de catego rias messiânicas e, analogamente, (b) acompanharei os célebres qualificati vos que Scholem atribui ao “texto puramente judeu” de Benjamin [ein rein 
jüdischer Text], quando o caracteriza como uma manifestação de “niilismo 
positivo” ou de “nobre e positiva violência da destruição” [die edle und 
positive Gewalt der Zerstörung] (Scholem, 2007, p. 501-502). Esses dois 
elementos (o messianismo e o niilismo positivo) poderiam ampliar a minha 
intervenção sobre o texto de Benjamin e, talvez, negar a vantagem que o 
título do presente artigo goza em relação a seu subtítulo (A rebelião contra 
Moisés como o primeiro ato de messianismo). Estaria em posição de des taque, então, a sugestão ou intuição genial de Benjamin de que a primeira grande rebelião na história da justiça (e a última no quadro do mito5
 ou do 
direito) evoca ou provoca qualquer coisa de messiânico; que esse episódio 
maior na vida de certo povo – cujos iniciadores são Coré e alguns rebeldes 
– representa o começo da construção do teatro messiânico.
PB  - Instituto Brasiliense de Direito Público – IDP
T2  - Revista Direito Público
T1  - A Violência Divina de Benjamin e o Caso de Coré – A Rebelião contra  Moisés Como Primeira Cena do Messianismo (Números, 16)1
IS  - 96
VL  - 17
SP  - 358
EP  - 377
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Inicialmente, para justificar uma leitura suplementar da Crítica da vio lência de Benjamin, eu gostaria de apresentar as formas pelas quais esse tex to foi recebido e explicar as razões por trás da rica história de suas recons truções, que vão de Scholem e Löwenthal, até Honneth, Žižek e Butler. O 
que é que produz a “força desconstrutiva” dessa colagem densa e complexa 
de textos? Não é apenas a brilhante montagem de Benjamin, mas, tam bém, parece-me, esse poderoso mal-entendido que se dissimula no título 
de meu texto: A violência divina de Benjamin e o caso de Coré. Gostaria, 
então, de completar imediatamente essa analogia entre a violência divi na e o nome de Coré com duas anotações que devem limitar e complicar 
toda interpretação suplementar: (a) diferentemente de Leo Löwenthal (1990, 
p. 174), tratarei o texto de Benjamin como uma soma de figuras e de catego rias messiânicas e, analogamente, (b) acompanharei os célebres qualificati vos que Scholem atribui ao “texto puramente judeu” de Benjamin [ein rein 
jüdischer Text], quando o caracteriza como uma manifestação de “niilismo 
positivo” ou de “nobre e positiva violência da destruição” [die edle und 
positive Gewalt der Zerstörung] (Scholem, 2007, p. 501-502). Esses dois 
elementos (o messianismo e o niilismo positivo) poderiam ampliar a minha 
intervenção sobre o texto de Benjamin e, talvez, negar a vantagem que o 
título do presente artigo goza em relação a seu subtítulo (A rebelião contra 
Moisés como o primeiro ato de messianismo). Estaria em posição de des taque, então, a sugestão ou intuição genial de Benjamin de que a primeira grande rebelião na história da justiça (e a última no quadro do mito5
 ou do 
direito) evoca ou provoca qualquer coisa de messiânico; que esse episódio 
maior na vida de certo povo – cujos iniciadores são Coré e alguns rebeldes 
– representa o começo da construção do teatro messiânico.",
publisher = "Instituto Brasiliense de Direito Público – IDP",
journal = "Revista Direito Público",
title = "A Violência Divina de Benjamin e o Caso de Coré – A Rebelião contra  Moisés Como Primeira Cena do Messianismo (Números, 16)1",
number = "96",
volume = "17",
pages = "358-377"
}
Bojanić, P.. (2020). A Violência Divina de Benjamin e o Caso de Coré – A Rebelião contra  Moisés Como Primeira Cena do Messianismo (Números, 16)1. in Revista Direito Público
Instituto Brasiliense de Direito Público – IDP., 17(96), 358-377.
Bojanić P. A Violência Divina de Benjamin e o Caso de Coré – A Rebelião contra  Moisés Como Primeira Cena do Messianismo (Números, 16)1. in Revista Direito Público. 2020;17(96):358-377..
Bojanić, Petar, "A Violência Divina de Benjamin e o Caso de Coré – A Rebelião contra  Moisés Como Primeira Cena do Messianismo (Números, 16)1" in Revista Direito Público, 17, no. 96 (2020):358-377.

Engagement + (Joint) Commitment. A közös cselekvés kötelezettségéről

Bojanić, Petar; Đorđević, Edward

(Novi Sad : Forum, 2020)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
AU  - Đorđević, Edward
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2091
PB  - Novi Sad : Forum
T2  - Elköteleződés és kritika: Tanulmányok az angazsáltságról
T1  - Engagement + (Joint) Commitment. A közös cselekvés kötelezettségéről
SP  - 76
EP  - 79
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Bojanić, Petar and Đorđević, Edward",
year = "2020",
publisher = "Novi Sad : Forum",
journal = "Elköteleződés és kritika: Tanulmányok az angazsáltságról",
booktitle = "Engagement + (Joint) Commitment. A közös cselekvés kötelezettségéről",
pages = "76-79"
}
Bojanić, P.,& Đorđević, E.. (2020). Engagement + (Joint) Commitment. A közös cselekvés kötelezettségéről. in Elköteleződés és kritika: Tanulmányok az angazsáltságról
Novi Sad : Forum., 76-79.
Bojanić P, Đorđević E. Engagement + (Joint) Commitment. A közös cselekvés kötelezettségéről. in Elköteleződés és kritika: Tanulmányok az angazsáltságról. 2020;:76-79..
Bojanić, Petar, Đorđević, Edward, "Engagement + (Joint) Commitment. A közös cselekvés kötelezettségéről" in Elköteleződés és kritika: Tanulmányok az angazsáltságról (2020):76-79.