TY  - JOUR
AU  - Milović, Miroslav
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/fid/article/view/946
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2397
AB  - The author finds the possibility of overcoming the current liberal-capitalist system in a different conception of time, which requires a different attitude towards both the past and the future. The paper begins with an analysis of the Benjamin’s critique of Marx, followed by analysis of Derrida’s critique of Benjamin and finally Derrida’s critique of Marx. Benjamin points out the problem of teleological understanding of time, the understanding that the meaning of events comes only from the future, which is present in Marx, and which prevents us from escaping the “circle” of violence. Although he relies on Benjamin’s conception of time, the author seeks to transcend the understanding of law as something separate from justice, and law as violence. Therefore, the paper turns to Derrida and his understanding of the law, eventually providing new possibilities for understanding and constituting the left, social theory, but also critical thinking today.
AB  - Mogućnost prevazilaženja liberalno kapitalističkog Sistema današnjice autor nalazi u druga čijem promišljanju vremena, koje zahteva drugačiji odnos kako spram istorije, tako i buduć nosti. Rad počinje analizom Benjaminove kritike Marksa, koju zatim slede analize Deridine 
kritike Benjamina i na kraju Deridine kritike Marksa. Benjamin će ukazati na problem teleo loškog razumevanja vremena, shvatanje da smisao događaja dolazi tek iz budućnosti, koje je 
prisutno kod Marksa, a koje ne dopušta da se izađe iz „začaranog kruga“ nasilja. Premda se 
oslanja na Benjaminovo poimanje vremena, autor nastoji da prevaziđe razumevanje zakona 
kao nečega što je odvojeno od pravde, zakona kao nasilja. Stoga se rad okreće Deridi i nje govom shvatanju zakona, pružajući nam na kraju nove mogućnosti mišljenja i konstituisanja 
levice, socijalne teorije, ali i kritičkog mišljenja danas.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - The Pandemic As History
T1  - Pandemija kao istorija
IS  - 1
VL  - 32
SP  - 128
EP  - 134
DO  - 10.2298/FID2101128M
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Milović, Miroslav",
year = "2021",
abstract = "The author finds the possibility of overcoming the current liberal-capitalist system in a different conception of time, which requires a different attitude towards both the past and the future. The paper begins with an analysis of the Benjamin’s critique of Marx, followed by analysis of Derrida’s critique of Benjamin and finally Derrida’s critique of Marx. Benjamin points out the problem of teleological understanding of time, the understanding that the meaning of events comes only from the future, which is present in Marx, and which prevents us from escaping the “circle” of violence. Although he relies on Benjamin’s conception of time, the author seeks to transcend the understanding of law as something separate from justice, and law as violence. Therefore, the paper turns to Derrida and his understanding of the law, eventually providing new possibilities for understanding and constituting the left, social theory, but also critical thinking today., Mogućnost prevazilaženja liberalno kapitalističkog Sistema današnjice autor nalazi u druga čijem promišljanju vremena, koje zahteva drugačiji odnos kako spram istorije, tako i buduć nosti. Rad počinje analizom Benjaminove kritike Marksa, koju zatim slede analize Deridine 
kritike Benjamina i na kraju Deridine kritike Marksa. Benjamin će ukazati na problem teleo loškog razumevanja vremena, shvatanje da smisao događaja dolazi tek iz budućnosti, koje je 
prisutno kod Marksa, a koje ne dopušta da se izađe iz „začaranog kruga“ nasilja. Premda se 
oslanja na Benjaminovo poimanje vremena, autor nastoji da prevaziđe razumevanje zakona 
kao nečega što je odvojeno od pravde, zakona kao nasilja. Stoga se rad okreće Deridi i nje govom shvatanju zakona, pružajući nam na kraju nove mogućnosti mišljenja i konstituisanja 
levice, socijalne teorije, ali i kritičkog mišljenja danas.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "The Pandemic As History, Pandemija kao istorija",
number = "1",
volume = "32",
pages = "128-134",
doi = "10.2298/FID2101128M"
}

Milović, M.. (2021). The Pandemic As History. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 32(1), 128-134.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2101128M

Milović M. The Pandemic As History. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2021;32(1):128-134.
doi:10.2298/FID2101128M .

Milović, Miroslav, "The Pandemic As History" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 32, no. 1 (2021):128-134,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2101128M . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Milović, Miroslav
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID2001084M
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2069
AB  - This article is a part of a research project entitled Law as Potency, that, broadly put, investigates the relation between law and ontology. I argue, starting from St. Paul, that an ontological perspective can be understood as the possibility of justice, in a sense of a liberation of the human being. Thus, this paper offers an analysis of the concepts of potency and universality. Even though the term ‘universalism’ is not explicitly mentioned, it is present in St. Paul’s thinking and brought onto its practical consequences. In addition, Spinoza’s reading of St. Paul opens up a possibility to challenge this concept to a concept of modern teleology. Therefore, I discuss the consequences of this confrontation in regard to law, politics and economics. This leads to an articulation of another modernity, where, perhaps, the universal appears as the affirmation of difference.
AB  - Ovaj članak je deo istraživačkog projekta pod nazivom Zakon kao potencija, koji, u širem smislu, istražuje odnos prava i ontologije. Tvrdim, polazeći od Sv. Pavla, da se ontološka perspektiva može shvatiti kao mogućnost pravde, u smislu oslobađanja ljudskog bića. Stoga ovaj rad nudi analizu koncepata potencije i univerzalnosti. Iako termin „univerzalizam“ nije izričito pomenut, on je prisutan u mišljenju Sv. Pavla i doveden do svojih praktičnih posledica. Pored toga, Spinozino čitanje Sv. Pavla otvara mogućnost da se ovaj koncept iskuša konceptom moderne teleologije. Stoga raspravljam o posledicama ovog sučeljavanja u pogledu zakona, politike i ekonomije. To dovodi do artikulacije druge modernosti, gde se, možda, univerzalno pojavljuje kao afirmacija razlike.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Ius sive Potentia: Paul and Spinoza
T1  - Ius sive Potentia: Pavle i Spinoza
IS  - 1
VL  - 31
SP  - 84
EP  - 97
DO  - 10.2298/FID2001084M
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Milović, Miroslav",
year = "2020",
abstract = "This article is a part of a research project entitled Law as Potency, that, broadly put, investigates the relation between law and ontology. I argue, starting from St. Paul, that an ontological perspective can be understood as the possibility of justice, in a sense of a liberation of the human being. Thus, this paper offers an analysis of the concepts of potency and universality. Even though the term ‘universalism’ is not explicitly mentioned, it is present in St. Paul’s thinking and brought onto its practical consequences. In addition, Spinoza’s reading of St. Paul opens up a possibility to challenge this concept to a concept of modern teleology. Therefore, I discuss the consequences of this confrontation in regard to law, politics and economics. This leads to an articulation of another modernity, where, perhaps, the universal appears as the affirmation of difference., Ovaj članak je deo istraživačkog projekta pod nazivom Zakon kao potencija, koji, u širem smislu, istražuje odnos prava i ontologije. Tvrdim, polazeći od Sv. Pavla, da se ontološka perspektiva može shvatiti kao mogućnost pravde, u smislu oslobađanja ljudskog bića. Stoga ovaj rad nudi analizu koncepata potencije i univerzalnosti. Iako termin „univerzalizam“ nije izričito pomenut, on je prisutan u mišljenju Sv. Pavla i doveden do svojih praktičnih posledica. Pored toga, Spinozino čitanje Sv. Pavla otvara mogućnost da se ovaj koncept iskuša konceptom moderne teleologije. Stoga raspravljam o posledicama ovog sučeljavanja u pogledu zakona, politike i ekonomije. To dovodi do artikulacije druge modernosti, gde se, možda, univerzalno pojavljuje kao afirmacija razlike.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Ius sive Potentia: Paul and Spinoza, Ius sive Potentia: Pavle i Spinoza",
number = "1",
volume = "31",
pages = "84-97",
doi = "10.2298/FID2001084M"
}

Milović, M.. (2020). Ius sive Potentia: Paul and Spinoza. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 31(1), 84-97.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2001084M

Milović M. Ius sive Potentia: Paul and Spinoza. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2020;31(1):84-97.
doi:10.2298/FID2001084M .

Milović, Miroslav, "Ius sive Potentia: Paul and Spinoza" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 31, no. 1 (2020):84-97,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2001084M . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Milović, Miroslav
PY  - 2013
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/965
AB  - The paper reconstructs Modernity following two of its most important
lines of philosophy of law: jusnaturalism and idealism.
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Jusnaturalism and Idealism
T1  - Pravni naturalizam i idealizam
SP  - 103
EP  - 122
DO  - 10.2298/FID1303103M
ER  - 

@article{
editor = "Jovanov, Rastko",
author = "Milović, Miroslav",
year = "2013",
abstract = "The paper reconstructs Modernity following two of its most important
lines of philosophy of law: jusnaturalism and idealism.",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Jusnaturalism and Idealism, Pravni naturalizam i idealizam",
pages = "103-122",
doi = "10.2298/FID1303103M"
}

Jovanov, R.,& Milović, M.. (2013). Jusnaturalism and Idealism. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 103-122.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1303103M

Jovanov R, Milović M. Jusnaturalism and Idealism. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2013;:103-122.
doi:10.2298/FID1303103M .

Jovanov, Rastko, Milović, Miroslav, "Jusnaturalism and Idealism" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society (2013):103-122,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1303103M . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Milović, Miroslav
PY  - 2007
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/135
AB  - It might be that the crisis of democracy is crisis of thinking. Modern metaphysics affirms the monologue of the subject with respect to the problem of rationality, as well as in the social realm. It thus affirms liberal egoism. Such metaphysics structures modernity as a monologue. Thus the question arises: how to think the democracy within this monologue? Democracy appears to be a modern project impossible to achieve.
PB  - Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
T1  - Democracy and identity
SP  - 87
EP  - 101
DO  - 10.2298/FID0703087M
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Milović, Miroslav",
year = "2007",
abstract = "It might be that the crisis of democracy is crisis of thinking. Modern metaphysics affirms the monologue of the subject with respect to the problem of rationality, as well as in the social realm. It thus affirms liberal egoism. Such metaphysics structures modernity as a monologue. Thus the question arises: how to think the democracy within this monologue? Democracy appears to be a modern project impossible to achieve.",
publisher = "Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society",
title = "Democracy and identity",
pages = "87-101",
doi = "10.2298/FID0703087M"
}

Milović, M.. (2007). Democracy and identity. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 87-101.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0703087M

Milović M. Democracy and identity. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society. 2007;:87-101.
doi:10.2298/FID0703087M .

Milović, Miroslav, "Democracy and identity" in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society (2007):87-101,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0703087M . .