Pudar Draško, Gazela

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
orcid::0000-0001-8361-4144
  • Pudar Draško, Gazela (34)
  • Pudar, Gazela (18)
  • Pudar-Draško, Gazela (1)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

The Police: Instituting Violence

Bojanić, Petar; Pudar Draško, Gazela

(New York: Lexington Books, 2022)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2529
AB  - Speaking of the institution of the police in his famous 1921 text “Zur Kritik
der Gewalt” (“Toward the Critique of Violence”), Walter Benjamin gives two
very important characteristics of police violence.1 The first and fundamental
characteristic is that the police are always connected to violence but that the
police’s role within the state is difficult to pinpoint, given that the police
constitute an “institution of the modern State” (Benjamin 1986: 286–87).
Our intention in this text is to show that police violence is a consequence of
a deformation of the institution of police or a deformation of violence.
PB  - New York: Lexington Books
T2  - Violence and Reflexivity: The Place of Critique in the Reality of Domination
T1  - The Police: Instituting Violence
SP  - 157
EP  - 170
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Bojanić, Petar and Pudar Draško, Gazela",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Speaking of the institution of the police in his famous 1921 text “Zur Kritik
der Gewalt” (“Toward the Critique of Violence”), Walter Benjamin gives two
very important characteristics of police violence.1 The first and fundamental
characteristic is that the police are always connected to violence but that the
police’s role within the state is difficult to pinpoint, given that the police
constitute an “institution of the modern State” (Benjamin 1986: 286–87).
Our intention in this text is to show that police violence is a consequence of
a deformation of the institution of police or a deformation of violence.",
publisher = "New York: Lexington Books",
journal = "Violence and Reflexivity: The Place of Critique in the Reality of Domination",
booktitle = "The Police: Instituting Violence",
pages = "157-170"
}
Bojanić, P.,& Pudar Draško, G.. (2022). The Police: Instituting Violence. in Violence and Reflexivity: The Place of Critique in the Reality of Domination
New York: Lexington Books., 157-170.
Bojanić P, Pudar Draško G. The Police: Instituting Violence. in Violence and Reflexivity: The Place of Critique in the Reality of Domination. 2022;:157-170..
Bojanić, Petar, Pudar Draško, Gazela, "The Police: Instituting Violence" in Violence and Reflexivity: The Place of Critique in the Reality of Domination (2022):157-170.

Angažovane reči

Zarić, Zona; Pudar Draško, Gazela

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2022)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Zarić, Zona
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
PY  - 2022
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2522
AB  - Misao je povezana sa događajem kao krug sa svojim centrom – naglašava Hana Arent (Hannah Arendt) na samom početku Krize kulture – i ako se od njega odvoji, rizikuje da izgubi svoj značaj. Misao živi na međi prošlosti i budućnosti, tražeći sopstveni smisao u istoriji. Čin mišljenja je neodvojiv od svakodnevnih suočavanja sa svetom. Gajeći čuđenje i dostupnost prema događajima, misao se više ne svodi isključivo na stvaranje novih ideja, već ima i novi zahtev – da identifikuje značajne događaje
našeg vremena, omogući da ih bolje razumemo i tako izoštri uvid u stvarnost koja nas okružuje.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - Angažovane reči
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Zarić, Zona and Pudar Draško, Gazela",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Misao je povezana sa događajem kao krug sa svojim centrom – naglašava Hana Arent (Hannah Arendt) na samom početku Krize kulture – i ako se od njega odvoji, rizikuje da izgubi svoj značaj. Misao živi na međi prošlosti i budućnosti, tražeći sopstveni smisao u istoriji. Čin mišljenja je neodvojiv od svakodnevnih suočavanja sa svetom. Gajeći čuđenje i dostupnost prema događajima, misao se više ne svodi isključivo na stvaranje novih ideja, već ima i novi zahtev – da identifikuje značajne događaje
našeg vremena, omogući da ih bolje razumemo i tako izoštri uvid u stvarnost koja nas okružuje.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "Angažovane reči"
}
Zarić, Z.,& Pudar Draško, G.. (2022). Angažovane reči. 
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
Zarić Z, Pudar Draško G. Angažovane reči. 2022;..
Zarić, Zona, Pudar Draško, Gazela, "Angažovane reči" (2022).

Pojmovnik angažmana

Cvejić, Igor; Pudar Draško, Gazela; Lošonc, Mark

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2021)

TY  - DATA
AU  - Cvejić, Igor
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Lošonc, Mark
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2501
AB  - Čini se da kada pristupamo temi angažmana forma rečnika, makar preliminarno, najviše odgovara. Upotreba termina „angažman“ u različitim jezicima i kontekstima danas je doživela toliku proliferaciju da mnogi autori, s pravom, izbegavaju da ga odrede jednoznačno. Angažman se prostire kroz različite sfere naše stvarnosti, od privatnih zalaganja, preko radnih mesta, ugovora, javnih nastupa i participacija u društvenom i političkom životu zajednice, do izvršenja vojničkih komandi. Na svom putu čini se da se angažman kreće između ili transcendira klasična pitanja koja bi pomogla u njegovom određenju, kao što su pitanja pasivnosti i aktivnosti, individualnog i kolektivnog, striktnih dužnosti i fleksibilnosti itd. S druge strane, za angažman kao specifičan vid aktivnosti, založenosti i upletenosti u ono čime smo angažovani ne postoji drugi odgovarajući termin koji bi objasnio ovaj fenomen, te prema tome, uprkos svoj svojoj složenosti, potreba za njegovim razumevanjem ne gubi na značaju.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - Pojmovnik angažmana
ER  - 
@misc{
author = "Cvejić, Igor and Pudar Draško, Gazela and Lošonc, Mark",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Čini se da kada pristupamo temi angažmana forma rečnika, makar preliminarno, najviše odgovara. Upotreba termina „angažman“ u različitim jezicima i kontekstima danas je doživela toliku proliferaciju da mnogi autori, s pravom, izbegavaju da ga odrede jednoznačno. Angažman se prostire kroz različite sfere naše stvarnosti, od privatnih zalaganja, preko radnih mesta, ugovora, javnih nastupa i participacija u društvenom i političkom životu zajednice, do izvršenja vojničkih komandi. Na svom putu čini se da se angažman kreće između ili transcendira klasična pitanja koja bi pomogla u njegovom određenju, kao što su pitanja pasivnosti i aktivnosti, individualnog i kolektivnog, striktnih dužnosti i fleksibilnosti itd. S druge strane, za angažman kao specifičan vid aktivnosti, založenosti i upletenosti u ono čime smo angažovani ne postoji drugi odgovarajući termin koji bi objasnio ovaj fenomen, te prema tome, uprkos svoj svojoj složenosti, potreba za njegovim razumevanjem ne gubi na značaju.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "Pojmovnik angažmana"
}
Cvejić, I., Pudar Draško, G.,& Lošonc, M.. (2021). Pojmovnik angažmana. 
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
Cvejić I, Pudar Draško G, Lošonc M. Pojmovnik angažmana. 2021;..
Cvejić, Igor, Pudar Draško, Gazela, Lošonc, Mark, "Pojmovnik angažmana" (2021).

Otpor ka politici

Pudar Draško, Gazela; Delibašić, Balša

(Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, 2020)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Delibašić, Balša
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2327
AB  - Razlozi izostanka šire građanske antiautoritarne mobilizacije u savremenoj Srbiji mogu biti jasniji ukoliko se temeljnije osvrnemo na uslove nastajanja i nestajanja pokreta Otpor, nosioca značajnog dela aktivnosti koje su prethodile i vodile petooktobarskim promenama. Uporednom analizom dostupnih istraživanja među nekadašnjim članstvom Otpora i aktivistima savremenih
pokreta pokazaćemo značajne sličnosti u percepciji političkog konteksta između 2000. i kraja druge decenije XXI veka. Sa druge strane, kontekstualna analiza ukazuje na značajne razlike između ova dva vremenska trenutka u pogledu moći delanja (agency) angažovanih aktera u političkoj areni Srbije. Uspeh Otpora u stvaranju efikasnog zajedničkog subjekta promena, bez obzira na ideološku heterogenost članova pokreta, nužno je razmotriti u protivstavu sa neuspehom njegovog opstanka kao društvenog i/ili političkog aktera upravo zbog te heterogenosti. Možemo li govoriti o naučenim lekcijama, odnosno da li je Otpor u politici paradigma otpora politici građana Srbije?
AB  - The reasons for absence of broad civic anti-authoritarian activism in contemporary Serbia can be gleaned from a closer look at the circumstances of emergence and disappearance of the movement Otpor [Resistance], which played a major role in the lead-up and events of October 5th, 2000. Through a comparative analysis of available studies of former Otpor members, as well as other activists of various movements, we show significant overlap in perception of the political context of 2000 and the end of the 2010s. On the other hand, context analysis also shows significant differences between these two moments regarding the agency of actors on the Serbian political stage. Otpor’s success in producing an efficient common subject of change, despite internal ideological heterogeneity, must be weighed against the counter claim of failure to endure as  social and/or political actor (precisely due to its internal differences). Can we speak of lessons learned? Could Resistance in politics be the source of civic resistance towards politics in Serbia?
PB  - Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka
T2  - Dvadeset godina 5. oktobra
T1  - Otpor ka politici
T1  - Resistance to Politics
SP  - 71
EP  - 88
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Pudar Draško, Gazela and Delibašić, Balša",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Razlozi izostanka šire građanske antiautoritarne mobilizacije u savremenoj Srbiji mogu biti jasniji ukoliko se temeljnije osvrnemo na uslove nastajanja i nestajanja pokreta Otpor, nosioca značajnog dela aktivnosti koje su prethodile i vodile petooktobarskim promenama. Uporednom analizom dostupnih istraživanja među nekadašnjim članstvom Otpora i aktivistima savremenih
pokreta pokazaćemo značajne sličnosti u percepciji političkog konteksta između 2000. i kraja druge decenije XXI veka. Sa druge strane, kontekstualna analiza ukazuje na značajne razlike između ova dva vremenska trenutka u pogledu moći delanja (agency) angažovanih aktera u političkoj areni Srbije. Uspeh Otpora u stvaranju efikasnog zajedničkog subjekta promena, bez obzira na ideološku heterogenost članova pokreta, nužno je razmotriti u protivstavu sa neuspehom njegovog opstanka kao društvenog i/ili političkog aktera upravo zbog te heterogenosti. Možemo li govoriti o naučenim lekcijama, odnosno da li je Otpor u politici paradigma otpora politici građana Srbije?, The reasons for absence of broad civic anti-authoritarian activism in contemporary Serbia can be gleaned from a closer look at the circumstances of emergence and disappearance of the movement Otpor [Resistance], which played a major role in the lead-up and events of October 5th, 2000. Through a comparative analysis of available studies of former Otpor members, as well as other activists of various movements, we show significant overlap in perception of the political context of 2000 and the end of the 2010s. On the other hand, context analysis also shows significant differences between these two moments regarding the agency of actors on the Serbian political stage. Otpor’s success in producing an efficient common subject of change, despite internal ideological heterogeneity, must be weighed against the counter claim of failure to endure as  social and/or political actor (precisely due to its internal differences). Can we speak of lessons learned? Could Resistance in politics be the source of civic resistance towards politics in Serbia?",
publisher = "Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka",
journal = "Dvadeset godina 5. oktobra",
booktitle = "Otpor ka politici, Resistance to Politics",
pages = "71-88"
}
Pudar Draško, G.,& Delibašić, B.. (2020). Otpor ka politici. in Dvadeset godina 5. oktobra
Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka., 71-88.
Pudar Draško G, Delibašić B. Otpor ka politici. in Dvadeset godina 5. oktobra. 2020;:71-88..
Pudar Draško, Gazela, Delibašić, Balša, "Otpor ka politici" in Dvadeset godina 5. oktobra (2020):71-88.

Intellectuals between radicalization and reconciliation in the Western Balkans

Pudar Draško, Gazela; Pavlović, Aleksandar

(Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2020)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Pavlović, Aleksandar
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2457
AB  - According to cultural definitions, intellectuals can be defined as social actors who have developed public authority based on cultural achievements and/or positions. Intellectuals are key participants in the creation, specification, articulation and dissemination of any form of social ideas. Their relevance can be particularly prominent in societies dominated by nationalism, because they have the ability to sift through a particular national/ethnic tradition, selecting specific moments and elements from the collective memory and thus strengthening a given national ideology. In the Westerns Balkans, intellectual elites mostly positioned themselves as bearers of national programs, especially in the 1980s and 1990s. This, almost exclusively male, group was awarded disproportionately large space in the media. Smaller groups of a(nti)nationally oriented intellectuals never gained such dominance in public discourse, but continuously used their opportunities of influencing public opinion to express the necessity of repudiation of extremism and breaking with the ideology that hampers the normalization of socio-political life in the region. We analyze here the role of intellectuals to both radicalization and reconciliation in the Western Balkans, focusing especially on the former Yugoslavia. Starting with the 1987 Memorandum of the SASA, widely regarded as the ultimate intellectual fuel to the deepening the conflict, we end with the most recent case of Declaration on the Common Language (2017), which opted for the unification of the now separated Western Balkan languages into a joint one.
PB  - Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft
T2  - The Challenges of Democratization and Reconciliation in the Post-Yugoslav Space
T1  - Intellectuals between radicalization and reconciliation in the Western Balkans
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Pudar Draško, Gazela and Pavlović, Aleksandar",
year = "2020",
abstract = "According to cultural definitions, intellectuals can be defined as social actors who have developed public authority based on cultural achievements and/or positions. Intellectuals are key participants in the creation, specification, articulation and dissemination of any form of social ideas. Their relevance can be particularly prominent in societies dominated by nationalism, because they have the ability to sift through a particular national/ethnic tradition, selecting specific moments and elements from the collective memory and thus strengthening a given national ideology. In the Westerns Balkans, intellectual elites mostly positioned themselves as bearers of national programs, especially in the 1980s and 1990s. This, almost exclusively male, group was awarded disproportionately large space in the media. Smaller groups of a(nti)nationally oriented intellectuals never gained such dominance in public discourse, but continuously used their opportunities of influencing public opinion to express the necessity of repudiation of extremism and breaking with the ideology that hampers the normalization of socio-political life in the region. We analyze here the role of intellectuals to both radicalization and reconciliation in the Western Balkans, focusing especially on the former Yugoslavia. Starting with the 1987 Memorandum of the SASA, widely regarded as the ultimate intellectual fuel to the deepening the conflict, we end with the most recent case of Declaration on the Common Language (2017), which opted for the unification of the now separated Western Balkan languages into a joint one.",
publisher = "Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft",
journal = "The Challenges of Democratization and Reconciliation in the Post-Yugoslav Space",
booktitle = "Intellectuals between radicalization and reconciliation in the Western Balkans"
}
Pudar Draško, G.,& Pavlović, A.. (2020). Intellectuals between radicalization and reconciliation in the Western Balkans. in The Challenges of Democratization and Reconciliation in the Post-Yugoslav Space
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft..
Pudar Draško G, Pavlović A. Intellectuals between radicalization and reconciliation in the Western Balkans. in The Challenges of Democratization and Reconciliation in the Post-Yugoslav Space. 2020;..
Pudar Draško, Gazela, Pavlović, Aleksandar, "Intellectuals between radicalization and reconciliation in the Western Balkans" in The Challenges of Democratization and Reconciliation in the Post-Yugoslav Space (2020).

Otete institucije u Srbiji

Velinov, Marija; Pudar Draško, Gazela; Prodanović, Srđan

(Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2019)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Velinov, Marija
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2383
PB  - Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - Otete institucije u Srbiji
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Velinov, Marija and Pudar Draško, Gazela and Prodanović, Srđan",
year = "2019",
publisher = "Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "Otete institucije u Srbiji"
}
Velinov, M., Pudar Draško, G.,& Prodanović, S.. (2019). Otete institucije u Srbiji. 
Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
Velinov M, Pudar Draško G, Prodanović S. Otete institucije u Srbiji. 2019;..
Velinov, Marija, Pudar Draško, Gazela, Prodanović, Srđan, "Otete institucije u Srbiji" (2019).

Otuđenost između institucionalizacije i prakse

Velinov, Marija; Prodanović, Srđan; Pudar Draško, Gazela

(Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2019)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Velinov, Marija
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2059
PB  - Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Otete institucije u Srbiji: teorija i praksa
T1  - Otuđenost između institucionalizacije i prakse
SP  - 6
EP  - 12
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Velinov, Marija and Prodanović, Srđan and Pudar Draško, Gazela",
year = "2019",
publisher = "Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Otete institucije u Srbiji: teorija i praksa",
booktitle = "Otuđenost između institucionalizacije i prakse",
pages = "6-12"
}
Velinov, M., Prodanović, S.,& Pudar Draško, G.. (2019). Otuđenost između institucionalizacije i prakse. in Otete institucije u Srbiji: teorija i praksa
Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 6-12.
Velinov M, Prodanović S, Pudar Draško G. Otuđenost između institucionalizacije i prakse. in Otete institucije u Srbiji: teorija i praksa. 2019;:6-12..
Velinov, Marija, Prodanović, Srđan, Pudar Draško, Gazela, "Otuđenost između institucionalizacije i prakse" in Otete institucije u Srbiji: teorija i praksa (2019):6-12.

The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative

Fiket, Irena; Ivković, Marjan; Pudar Draško, Gazela; Vasiljević, Jelena

(Coordinamento SIBA - University of Salento, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2044
AB  - The main focus of our paper is on a specific form of democratic discourse, used in different types of social engagement actions (petitions, speeches, intellectual engagement, ad hoc citizens' protests, social movements etc.), that attempts to politicize a certain issue by challenging the neoliberal principle of instrumentalism which argues that democratic procedures can legitimately be abandoned in the name of the greater efficiency of socioeconomic development. Therefore, we start from identifying the discourse of "neoliberal instrumentalism" and its relative success in delegitimizing the welfare state and mechanisms of democratic decision making and we formulate a conceptual model of a democratic counter-narrative named "anti-instrumentalist discourse". Through empirical analyses of discourse used by We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, that mobilized against the Serbian government's urban project Belgrade Waterfront we try to illustrate the applicability and the heuristic value of the proposed model. The data for the analyses were collected through 1) desk analysis of available secondary data on the Belgrade Waterfront project, 2) official statements and proclamations of the We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, 3) semi-structured interviews with four core members of the initiative.
PB  - Coordinamento SIBA - University of Salento
T2  - Partecipazione E Conflitto
T1  - The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative
IS  - 3
VL  - 12
SP  - 898
EP  - 918
DO  - 10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Fiket, Irena and Ivković, Marjan and Pudar Draško, Gazela and Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2019",
abstract = "The main focus of our paper is on a specific form of democratic discourse, used in different types of social engagement actions (petitions, speeches, intellectual engagement, ad hoc citizens' protests, social movements etc.), that attempts to politicize a certain issue by challenging the neoliberal principle of instrumentalism which argues that democratic procedures can legitimately be abandoned in the name of the greater efficiency of socioeconomic development. Therefore, we start from identifying the discourse of "neoliberal instrumentalism" and its relative success in delegitimizing the welfare state and mechanisms of democratic decision making and we formulate a conceptual model of a democratic counter-narrative named "anti-instrumentalist discourse". Through empirical analyses of discourse used by We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, that mobilized against the Serbian government's urban project Belgrade Waterfront we try to illustrate the applicability and the heuristic value of the proposed model. The data for the analyses were collected through 1) desk analysis of available secondary data on the Belgrade Waterfront project, 2) official statements and proclamations of the We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, 3) semi-structured interviews with four core members of the initiative.",
publisher = "Coordinamento SIBA - University of Salento",
journal = "Partecipazione E Conflitto",
title = "The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative",
number = "3",
volume = "12",
pages = "898-918",
doi = "10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898"
}
Fiket, I., Ivković, M., Pudar Draško, G.,& Vasiljević, J.. (2019). The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative. in Partecipazione E Conflitto
Coordinamento SIBA - University of Salento., 12(3), 898-918.
https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898
Fiket I, Ivković M, Pudar Draško G, Vasiljević J. The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative. in Partecipazione E Conflitto. 2019;12(3):898-918.
doi:10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898 .
Fiket, Irena, Ivković, Marjan, Pudar Draško, Gazela, Vasiljević, Jelena, "The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative" in Partecipazione E Conflitto, 12, no. 3 (2019):898-918,
https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898 . .

Big dreams and small steps: comparative perspectives on the social movement struggle for democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia

Pudar Draško, Gazela; Fiket, Irena; Vasiljević, Jelena

(Taylor & Francis Online, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317?journalCode=fbss20
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2021
AB  - This paper provides a comparative analysis of social movements’ characteristics and capacities to struggle against illiberal tendencies and incite political change in Serbia and North Macedonia. First, we discuss the illiberal elements of political regimes in the countries in question, Serbia and North Macedonia. Then, we provide a comprehensive overview of progressive social movements in the two countries, formed and organized as a response to different authoritarian and non-democratic tendencies. Finally, we point to some differences in their organizing, coalition-forging and issue-defining principles, which, we believe, may help to explain the relative success of social movements in North Macedonia in producing relevant political outcomes, compared to the weak political impact of social movements in Serbia. Empirical data were collected during the summer of 2018 through in-depth interviews with members of social movements in North Macedonia and Serbia.
PB  - Taylor & Francis Online
T2  - Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
T1  - Big dreams and small steps: comparative perspectives on the social movement struggle for democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia
DO  - 10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Pudar Draško, Gazela and Fiket, Irena and Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2019",
abstract = "This paper provides a comparative analysis of social movements’ characteristics and capacities to struggle against illiberal tendencies and incite political change in Serbia and North Macedonia. First, we discuss the illiberal elements of political regimes in the countries in question, Serbia and North Macedonia. Then, we provide a comprehensive overview of progressive social movements in the two countries, formed and organized as a response to different authoritarian and non-democratic tendencies. Finally, we point to some differences in their organizing, coalition-forging and issue-defining principles, which, we believe, may help to explain the relative success of social movements in North Macedonia in producing relevant political outcomes, compared to the weak political impact of social movements in Serbia. Empirical data were collected during the summer of 2018 through in-depth interviews with members of social movements in North Macedonia and Serbia.",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Online",
journal = "Southeast European and Black Sea Studies",
title = "Big dreams and small steps: comparative perspectives on the social movement struggle for democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia",
doi = "10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317"
}
Pudar Draško, G., Fiket, I.,& Vasiljević, J.. (2019). Big dreams and small steps: comparative perspectives on the social movement struggle for democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia. in Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
Taylor & Francis Online..
https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317
Pudar Draško G, Fiket I, Vasiljević J. Big dreams and small steps: comparative perspectives on the social movement struggle for democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia. in Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. 2019;.
doi:10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317 .
Pudar Draško, Gazela, Fiket, Irena, Vasiljević, Jelena, "Big dreams and small steps: comparative perspectives on the social movement struggle for democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia" in Southeast European and Black Sea Studies (2019),
https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317 . .
10
8
4
9

Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations Figuring out the Enemy

Pavlović, Aleksandar; Pudar Draško, Gazela; Halili, Rigels

(London: Routledge, 2019)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Pavlović, Aleksandar
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Halili, Rigels
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2004
AB  - Identifying and explaining common views, ideas and traditions, this volume challenges the concept of Serbian-Albanian hostility by reinvestigating recent and historical events in the region. The contributors put forward critically oriented initiatives and alternatives to shed light on a range of relations and perspectives.

The central aim of the book is to ‘figure out’ the problematic relations between Serbs and Albanians – that is, to comprehend its origins and the actors involved, and to find ways to resolve and deal with this enmity. Treating the hostility as a construct of a long-running discourse about the Serbian or Albanian ‘Other’, scholars and intellectuals from Serbia, Kosovo and Albania examine the origins, channels, agents and mediums of this discourse from the 18th century to the present. Tracing the roots of the two ethnic groups' political divisions, contemporary practices and actions allows the contributors to reconsider mutually held negative perceptions and identify elements of a common, shared history. Examples of past and current cooperation are used to offer a critical analysis of all three societies.

This interdisciplinary publication brings together historiographical, literary, sociological, political, anthropological and philosophical analyses and enquiries and will be of interest to researchers in the fields of sociology, politics, cultural studies, history or anthropology; and to academics working in Slavonic and East European studies.
PB  - London: Routledge
T2  - Routledge, London; Southeast European Studies Series
T1  - Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations Figuring out the Enemy
DO  - 10.4324/9781351273169
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Pavlović, Aleksandar and Pudar Draško, Gazela and Halili, Rigels",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Identifying and explaining common views, ideas and traditions, this volume challenges the concept of Serbian-Albanian hostility by reinvestigating recent and historical events in the region. The contributors put forward critically oriented initiatives and alternatives to shed light on a range of relations and perspectives.

The central aim of the book is to ‘figure out’ the problematic relations between Serbs and Albanians – that is, to comprehend its origins and the actors involved, and to find ways to resolve and deal with this enmity. Treating the hostility as a construct of a long-running discourse about the Serbian or Albanian ‘Other’, scholars and intellectuals from Serbia, Kosovo and Albania examine the origins, channels, agents and mediums of this discourse from the 18th century to the present. Tracing the roots of the two ethnic groups' political divisions, contemporary practices and actions allows the contributors to reconsider mutually held negative perceptions and identify elements of a common, shared history. Examples of past and current cooperation are used to offer a critical analysis of all three societies.

This interdisciplinary publication brings together historiographical, literary, sociological, political, anthropological and philosophical analyses and enquiries and will be of interest to researchers in the fields of sociology, politics, cultural studies, history or anthropology; and to academics working in Slavonic and East European studies.",
publisher = "London: Routledge",
journal = "Routledge, London; Southeast European Studies Series",
title = "Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations Figuring out the Enemy",
doi = "10.4324/9781351273169"
}
Pavlović, A., Pudar Draško, G.,& Halili, R.. (2019). Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations Figuring out the Enemy. in Routledge, London; Southeast European Studies Series
London: Routledge..
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351273169
Pavlović A, Pudar Draško G, Halili R. Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations Figuring out the Enemy. in Routledge, London; Southeast European Studies Series. 2019;.
doi:10.4324/9781351273169 .
Pavlović, Aleksandar, Pudar Draško, Gazela, Halili, Rigels, "Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations Figuring out the Enemy" in Routledge, London; Southeast European Studies Series (2019),
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351273169 . .
4

Che cos’è la polizia? L’istituzione della violenza universale e la violenza dell’universale

Bojanić, Petar; Pudar Draško, Gazela

(Milano : La Nuova Italia Editrice, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2037
PB  - Milano : La Nuova Italia Editrice
T2  - Aut Aut
T1  - Che cos’è la polizia? L’istituzione della violenza universale e la violenza dell’universale
IS  - 384
SP  - 94
EP  - 112
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar and Pudar Draško, Gazela",
year = "2019",
publisher = "Milano : La Nuova Italia Editrice",
journal = "Aut Aut",
title = "Che cos’è la polizia? L’istituzione della violenza universale e la violenza dell’universale",
number = "384",
pages = "94-112"
}
Bojanić, P.,& Pudar Draško, G.. (2019). Che cos’è la polizia? L’istituzione della violenza universale e la violenza dell’universale. in Aut Aut
Milano : La Nuova Italia Editrice.(384), 94-112.
Bojanić P, Pudar Draško G. Che cos’è la polizia? L’istituzione della violenza universale e la violenza dell’universale. in Aut Aut. 2019;(384):94-112..
Bojanić, Petar, Pudar Draško, Gazela, "Che cos’è la polizia? L’istituzione della violenza universale e la violenza dell’universale" in Aut Aut, no. 384 (2019):94-112.

Politics of Enmity

Pudar Draško, Gazela; Meka, Eltion; Pavlović, Aleksandar

(Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2018)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Meka, Eltion
AU  - Pavlović, Aleksandar
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1611
AB  - This volume attempts contribute to the discussion about the nation, nationalism and its inevitable attendant, enmity. In what sense have friendship and hostility (Schmitt 1996, Derrida 1994, Bojanić 1995; 2015) gained new meanings, and what would those meanings be? Does nation-building always involve a common enemy one has to fight? Or does it meet its limits with being a mere remedy for contemporary forms of inequality, or a tranquilizer for those unsettled by the complexity and insecurity brought up by globalized capitalism? These questions become increasingly important as we witness the crisis of the collectivity-building process of the European Union. Do the contemporary politics of difference contest the notion of enmity or, quite to the contrary,
reaffirm it?
PB  - Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - Politics of Enmity
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Pudar Draško, Gazela and Meka, Eltion and Pavlović, Aleksandar",
year = "2018",
abstract = "This volume attempts contribute to the discussion about the nation, nationalism and its inevitable attendant, enmity. In what sense have friendship and hostility (Schmitt 1996, Derrida 1994, Bojanić 1995; 2015) gained new meanings, and what would those meanings be? Does nation-building always involve a common enemy one has to fight? Or does it meet its limits with being a mere remedy for contemporary forms of inequality, or a tranquilizer for those unsettled by the complexity and insecurity brought up by globalized capitalism? These questions become increasingly important as we witness the crisis of the collectivity-building process of the European Union. Do the contemporary politics of difference contest the notion of enmity or, quite to the contrary,
reaffirm it?",
publisher = "Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "Politics of Enmity"
}
Pudar Draško, G., Meka, E.,& Pavlović, A.. (2018). Politics of Enmity. 
Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
Pudar Draško G, Meka E, Pavlović A. Politics of Enmity. 2018;..
Pudar Draško, Gazela, Meka, Eltion, Pavlović, Aleksandar, "Politics of Enmity" (2018).

Enmity in the Intellectual World: Global Perspectives and Visions

Pudar Draško, Gazela; Pavlović, Aleksandar

(2017)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Pavlović, Aleksandar
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1412
AB  - This paper follows the perception of enmity relations in the recent online contributions of 20 global intellectual ‘superstars’, such as Habermas, Klein, 
Žižek and others. We observed two, very general distinctions; the first one includes 
several geopolitical oppositions such as Germany vs. the rest of the EU, Russia 
vs. the West and national vs. supranational, while the second is between the 
majority and privileged few/elites. We argue that contemporary intellectuals are 
still influential public figures, and that their efforts are more directed at mpowerment 
and reform of the societies through the existing system than at promoting and 
advocating alternatives to the existing neoliberal socio-economical order.
AB  - U ovom radu se dotičemo percepcije neprijateljskih odnosa u skorašnjim online 
prilozima 20 globalnih ’zvezda’ intelektualaca kao što su habermas, Klajn, Žižek 
i drugi. Zabeležili smo dve vrlo opšte distinkcije; prva uključuje nekoliko geopolitičkih protivstavljanja kao što su nemačka vs. ostatak EU, Rusija vs. Zapad i nacionalno vs. nadnacionalno, dok druga pravi razliku između većine i privilegovane nekolicine/elita. Tvrdimo da su savremeni intelektualci još uvek uticajne javne ličnosti i da su njihovi napori više usmereni ka osnaživanju i reformi društava kroz postojeći sistem nego na promociju i zagovaranje alternatia postojećem neoliberalnom društveno-ekonomskom poretku.
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Enmity in the Intellectual World:  Global Perspectives and Visions
T1  - neprijateljstvo u intelektualnom svetu:  globalne perspektive i vizije
IS  - 2
VL  - 28
SP  - 333
EP  - 345
DO  - 10.2298/FID1702333P
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Pudar Draško, Gazela and Pavlović, Aleksandar",
year = "2017",
abstract = "This paper follows the perception of enmity relations in the recent online contributions of 20 global intellectual ‘superstars’, such as Habermas, Klein, 
Žižek and others. We observed two, very general distinctions; the first one includes 
several geopolitical oppositions such as Germany vs. the rest of the EU, Russia 
vs. the West and national vs. supranational, while the second is between the 
majority and privileged few/elites. We argue that contemporary intellectuals are 
still influential public figures, and that their efforts are more directed at mpowerment 
and reform of the societies through the existing system than at promoting and 
advocating alternatives to the existing neoliberal socio-economical order., U ovom radu se dotičemo percepcije neprijateljskih odnosa u skorašnjim online 
prilozima 20 globalnih ’zvezda’ intelektualaca kao što su habermas, Klajn, Žižek 
i drugi. Zabeležili smo dve vrlo opšte distinkcije; prva uključuje nekoliko geopolitičkih protivstavljanja kao što su nemačka vs. ostatak EU, Rusija vs. Zapad i nacionalno vs. nadnacionalno, dok druga pravi razliku između većine i privilegovane nekolicine/elita. Tvrdimo da su savremeni intelektualci još uvek uticajne javne ličnosti i da su njihovi napori više usmereni ka osnaživanju i reformi društava kroz postojeći sistem nego na promociju i zagovaranje alternatia postojećem neoliberalnom društveno-ekonomskom poretku.",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Enmity in the Intellectual World:  Global Perspectives and Visions, neprijateljstvo u intelektualnom svetu:  globalne perspektive i vizije",
number = "2",
volume = "28",
pages = "333-345",
doi = "10.2298/FID1702333P"
}
Pudar Draško, G.,& Pavlović, A.. (2017). Enmity in the Intellectual World:  Global Perspectives and Visions. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 28(2), 333-345.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1702333P
Pudar Draško G, Pavlović A. Enmity in the Intellectual World:  Global Perspectives and Visions. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2017;28(2):333-345.
doi:10.2298/FID1702333P .
Pudar Draško, Gazela, Pavlović, Aleksandar, "Enmity in the Intellectual World:  Global Perspectives and Visions" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 28, no. 2 (2017):333-345,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1702333P . .

Theories and concepts of youth work in South-East Europe

Pudar Draško, Gazela

(Strasbourg : Council of Europe and European Commission, 2017)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://pjp-eu.coe.int/web/youth-partnership/thinking-seriously-about-youth-work
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1593
PB  - Strasbourg : Council of Europe and European Commission
T2  - Thinking Seriously about Youth Work: And how to prepare people to do it
T1  - Theories and concepts of youth work in South-East Europe
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Pudar Draško, Gazela",
year = "2017",
publisher = "Strasbourg : Council of Europe and European Commission",
journal = "Thinking Seriously about Youth Work: And how to prepare people to do it",
title = "Theories and concepts of youth work in South-East Europe"
}
Pudar Draško, G.. (2017). Theories and concepts of youth work in South-East Europe. in Thinking Seriously about Youth Work: And how to prepare people to do it
Strasbourg : Council of Europe and European Commission..
Pudar Draško G. Theories and concepts of youth work in South-East Europe. in Thinking Seriously about Youth Work: And how to prepare people to do it. 2017;..
Pudar Draško, Gazela, "Theories and concepts of youth work in South-East Europe" in Thinking Seriously about Youth Work: And how to prepare people to do it (2017).

Koliko je angažman intelektualaca važan?

Pudar Draško, Gazela

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2017)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1592
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
PB  - Novi Sad : Akademska knjiga 
T2  - Angažman: Uvod u studije angažovanosti
T1  - Koliko je angažman intelektualaca važan?
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Pudar Draško, Gazela",
year = "2017",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Novi Sad : Akademska knjiga ",
journal = "Angažman: Uvod u studije angažovanosti",
booktitle = "Koliko je angažman intelektualaca važan?"
}
Pudar Draško, G.. (2017). Koliko je angažman intelektualaca važan?. in Angažman: Uvod u studije angažovanosti
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
Pudar Draško G. Koliko je angažman intelektualaca važan?. in Angažman: Uvod u studije angažovanosti. 2017;..
Pudar Draško, Gazela, "Koliko je angažman intelektualaca važan?" in Angažman: Uvod u studije angažovanosti (2017).

Političke orijentacije građana Srbije: kartografija nemoći

Pudar Draško, Gazela

(Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, 2017)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1589
PB  - Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung
T1  - Političke orijentacije građana Srbije: kartografija nemoći
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Pudar Draško, Gazela",
year = "2017",
publisher = "Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung",
title = "Političke orijentacije građana Srbije: kartografija nemoći"
}
Pudar Draško, G.. (2017). Političke orijentacije građana Srbije: kartografija nemoći. 
Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung..
Pudar Draško G. Političke orijentacije građana Srbije: kartografija nemoći. 2017;..
Pudar Draško, Gazela, "Političke orijentacije građana Srbije: kartografija nemoći" (2017).

O čemu govorimo kada govorimo o intelektualcu: ideje i iluzije

Pudar Draško, Gazela

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2017)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://www.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/biblioteke/
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1588
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - O čemu govorimo kada govorimo o intelektualcu: ideje i iluzije
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Pudar Draško, Gazela",
year = "2017",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "O čemu govorimo kada govorimo o intelektualcu: ideje i iluzije"
}
Pudar Draško, G.. (2017). O čemu govorimo kada govorimo o intelektualcu: ideje i iluzije. 
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
Pudar Draško G. O čemu govorimo kada govorimo o intelektualcu: ideje i iluzije. 2017;..
Pudar Draško, Gazela, "O čemu govorimo kada govorimo o intelektualcu: ideje i iluzije" (2017).

Do intellectuals matter?: Proposal for a study of influence

Pudar Draško, Gazela

(Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2016)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=387
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1787
AB  - The paper strives to explore the (non)existence of influence of intellectuals in society. Intellectuals are seen as a loose elite network of specific social actors who possess advance knowledge or creativity recognized in the cultural field of academia and/or art, hold a certain authority or power to be heard in the public, and who are publicly engaged. The aim of the paper is to fill the gap in the sociology of intellectuals and offer a possible framework for empirical research of intellectuals’ influence. This framework is operationalized using three levels: self-evaluation of their own influence, estimation of their social status and intellectual authority over (primarily) elites, and finally external “objectified” measures. The author hereby calls on the testing of the proposed model and any proposals for its improvement
PB  - Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Do intellectuals matter?: Proposal for a study of influence
IS  - 2
VL  - 27
SP  - 343
EP  - 355
DO  - 10.2298/FID1602343P
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Pudar Draško, Gazela",
year = "2016",
abstract = "The paper strives to explore the (non)existence of influence of intellectuals in society. Intellectuals are seen as a loose elite network of specific social actors who possess advance knowledge or creativity recognized in the cultural field of academia and/or art, hold a certain authority or power to be heard in the public, and who are publicly engaged. The aim of the paper is to fill the gap in the sociology of intellectuals and offer a possible framework for empirical research of intellectuals’ influence. This framework is operationalized using three levels: self-evaluation of their own influence, estimation of their social status and intellectual authority over (primarily) elites, and finally external “objectified” measures. The author hereby calls on the testing of the proposed model and any proposals for its improvement",
publisher = "Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Do intellectuals matter?: Proposal for a study of influence",
number = "2",
volume = "27",
pages = "343-355",
doi = "10.2298/FID1602343P"
}
Pudar Draško, G.. (2016). Do intellectuals matter?: Proposal for a study of influence. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 27(2), 343-355.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1602343P
Pudar Draško G. Do intellectuals matter?: Proposal for a study of influence. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2016;27(2):343-355.
doi:10.2298/FID1602343P .
Pudar Draško, Gazela, "Do intellectuals matter?: Proposal for a study of influence" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 27, no. 2 (2016):343-355,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1602343P . .

Pristup zapošljavanju i obrazovanju u ruralnim oblastima Srbije

Pudar Draško, Gazela; Ćeriman, Jelena; Resanović, Milica

(Beograd: Centar za etiku, pravo i primenjenu filozofiju (CELAP), 2016)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Ćeriman, Jelena
AU  - Resanović, Milica
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1752
PB  - Beograd: Centar za etiku, pravo i primenjenu filozofiju (CELAP)
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Siromaštvo, ruralnost, rod: Istraživanje funkcionisanja sistema socijalne zaštite u ruralnim oblastima Srbije
T1  - Pristup zapošljavanju i obrazovanju u ruralnim oblastima Srbije
SP  - 65
EP  - 85
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Pudar Draško, Gazela and Ćeriman, Jelena and Resanović, Milica",
year = "2016",
publisher = "Beograd: Centar za etiku, pravo i primenjenu filozofiju (CELAP), Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Siromaštvo, ruralnost, rod: Istraživanje funkcionisanja sistema socijalne zaštite u ruralnim oblastima Srbije",
booktitle = "Pristup zapošljavanju i obrazovanju u ruralnim oblastima Srbije",
pages = "65-85"
}
Pudar Draško, G., Ćeriman, J.,& Resanović, M.. (2016). Pristup zapošljavanju i obrazovanju u ruralnim oblastima Srbije. in Siromaštvo, ruralnost, rod: Istraživanje funkcionisanja sistema socijalne zaštite u ruralnim oblastima Srbije
Beograd: Centar za etiku, pravo i primenjenu filozofiju (CELAP)., 65-85.
Pudar Draško G, Ćeriman J, Resanović M. Pristup zapošljavanju i obrazovanju u ruralnim oblastima Srbije. in Siromaštvo, ruralnost, rod: Istraživanje funkcionisanja sistema socijalne zaštite u ruralnim oblastima Srbije. 2016;:65-85..
Pudar Draško, Gazela, Ćeriman, Jelena, Resanović, Milica, "Pristup zapošljavanju i obrazovanju u ruralnim oblastima Srbije" in Siromaštvo, ruralnost, rod: Istraživanje funkcionisanja sistema socijalne zaštite u ruralnim oblastima Srbije (2016):65-85.

Preporuke za unapređenje života i usluga iz ugla sagovornika/ca u ruralnim područjima

Pudar Draško, Gazela

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2016)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1629
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
PB  - Beograd : Centar za etiku, pravo i primenjenu filozofiju
T2  - Siromaštvo, ruralnost, rod: Istraživanje funkcionisanja sistema socijalne zaštite u ruralnim oblastima Srbije
T1  - Preporuke za unapređenje života i usluga iz ugla sagovornika/ca u ruralnim područjima
SP  - 137
EP  - 148
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Pudar Draško, Gazela",
year = "2016",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd : Centar za etiku, pravo i primenjenu filozofiju",
journal = "Siromaštvo, ruralnost, rod: Istraživanje funkcionisanja sistema socijalne zaštite u ruralnim oblastima Srbije",
booktitle = "Preporuke za unapređenje života i usluga iz ugla sagovornika/ca u ruralnim područjima",
pages = "137-148"
}
Pudar Draško, G.. (2016). Preporuke za unapređenje života i usluga iz ugla sagovornika/ca u ruralnim područjima. in Siromaštvo, ruralnost, rod: Istraživanje funkcionisanja sistema socijalne zaštite u ruralnim oblastima Srbije
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 137-148.
Pudar Draško G. Preporuke za unapređenje života i usluga iz ugla sagovornika/ca u ruralnim područjima. in Siromaštvo, ruralnost, rod: Istraživanje funkcionisanja sistema socijalne zaštite u ruralnim oblastima Srbije. 2016;:137-148..
Pudar Draško, Gazela, "Preporuke za unapređenje života i usluga iz ugla sagovornika/ca u ruralnim područjima" in Siromaštvo, ruralnost, rod: Istraživanje funkcionisanja sistema socijalne zaštite u ruralnim oblastima Srbije (2016):137-148.

Informisanost i zadovoljstvo uslugama socijalne zaštite u ruralnim područjima Srbije

Pudar Draško, Gazela; Nećak, Mirjana; Todorović, Bojan

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2016)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Nećak, Mirjana
AU  - Todorović, Bojan
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1628
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
PB  - Beograd : Centar za etiku, pravo i primenjenu filozofiju
T2  - Siromaštvo, ruralnost, rod: Istraživanje funkcionisanja sistema socijalne zaštite u ruralnim oblastima Srbije
T1  - Informisanost i zadovoljstvo uslugama socijalne zaštite u ruralnim područjima Srbije
SP  - 122
EP  - 136
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Pudar Draško, Gazela and Nećak, Mirjana and Todorović, Bojan",
year = "2016",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd : Centar za etiku, pravo i primenjenu filozofiju",
journal = "Siromaštvo, ruralnost, rod: Istraživanje funkcionisanja sistema socijalne zaštite u ruralnim oblastima Srbije",
booktitle = "Informisanost i zadovoljstvo uslugama socijalne zaštite u ruralnim područjima Srbije",
pages = "122-136"
}
Pudar Draško, G., Nećak, M.,& Todorović, B.. (2016). Informisanost i zadovoljstvo uslugama socijalne zaštite u ruralnim područjima Srbije. in Siromaštvo, ruralnost, rod: Istraživanje funkcionisanja sistema socijalne zaštite u ruralnim oblastima Srbije
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 122-136.
Pudar Draško G, Nećak M, Todorović B. Informisanost i zadovoljstvo uslugama socijalne zaštite u ruralnim područjima Srbije. in Siromaštvo, ruralnost, rod: Istraživanje funkcionisanja sistema socijalne zaštite u ruralnim oblastima Srbije. 2016;:122-136..
Pudar Draško, Gazela, Nećak, Mirjana, Todorović, Bojan, "Informisanost i zadovoljstvo uslugama socijalne zaštite u ruralnim područjima Srbije" in Siromaštvo, ruralnost, rod: Istraživanje funkcionisanja sistema socijalne zaštite u ruralnim oblastima Srbije (2016):122-136.

Pristup zapošljavanju i obrazovanju u ruralnim oblastima Srbije

Pudar Draško, Gazela; Ćeriman, Jelena; Resanović, Milica

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2016)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Ćeriman, Jelena
AU  - Resanović, Milica
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1627
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
PB  - Beograd : Centar za etiku, pravo i primenjenu filozofiju
T2  - Siromaštvo, ruralnost, rod: Istraživanje funkcionisanja sistema socijalne zaštite u ruralnim oblastima Srbije
T1  - Pristup zapošljavanju i obrazovanju u ruralnim oblastima Srbije
SP  - 65
EP  - 85
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Pudar Draško, Gazela and Ćeriman, Jelena and Resanović, Milica",
year = "2016",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd : Centar za etiku, pravo i primenjenu filozofiju",
journal = "Siromaštvo, ruralnost, rod: Istraživanje funkcionisanja sistema socijalne zaštite u ruralnim oblastima Srbije",
booktitle = "Pristup zapošljavanju i obrazovanju u ruralnim oblastima Srbije",
pages = "65-85"
}
Pudar Draško, G., Ćeriman, J.,& Resanović, M.. (2016). Pristup zapošljavanju i obrazovanju u ruralnim oblastima Srbije. in Siromaštvo, ruralnost, rod: Istraživanje funkcionisanja sistema socijalne zaštite u ruralnim oblastima Srbije
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 65-85.
Pudar Draško G, Ćeriman J, Resanović M. Pristup zapošljavanju i obrazovanju u ruralnim oblastima Srbije. in Siromaštvo, ruralnost, rod: Istraživanje funkcionisanja sistema socijalne zaštite u ruralnim oblastima Srbije. 2016;:65-85..
Pudar Draško, Gazela, Ćeriman, Jelena, Resanović, Milica, "Pristup zapošljavanju i obrazovanju u ruralnim oblastima Srbije" in Siromaštvo, ruralnost, rod: Istraživanje funkcionisanja sistema socijalne zaštite u ruralnim oblastima Srbije (2016):65-85.

Dostupnost socijalnih usluga u ruralnim oblastima

Pudar Draško, Gazela

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2016)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1626
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
PB  - Beograd : Centar za etiku, pravo i primenjenu filozofiju
PB  - Novi Sad : Akademska knjiga
T2  - Ruralnost i rod: Dostupnost i prepoznavanje programa socijalne zaštite
T1  - Dostupnost socijalnih usluga u ruralnim oblastima
SP  - 26
EP  - 39
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Pudar Draško, Gazela",
year = "2016",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Beograd : Centar za etiku, pravo i primenjenu filozofiju, Novi Sad : Akademska knjiga",
journal = "Ruralnost i rod: Dostupnost i prepoznavanje programa socijalne zaštite",
booktitle = "Dostupnost socijalnih usluga u ruralnim oblastima",
pages = "26-39"
}
Pudar Draško, G.. (2016). Dostupnost socijalnih usluga u ruralnim oblastima. in Ruralnost i rod: Dostupnost i prepoznavanje programa socijalne zaštite
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 26-39.
Pudar Draško G. Dostupnost socijalnih usluga u ruralnim oblastima. in Ruralnost i rod: Dostupnost i prepoznavanje programa socijalne zaštite. 2016;:26-39..
Pudar Draško, Gazela, "Dostupnost socijalnih usluga u ruralnim oblastima" in Ruralnost i rod: Dostupnost i prepoznavanje programa socijalne zaštite (2016):26-39.

Figura e armikut: ripërfytyrimi i marrëdhënieve shqiptaro-serbe

Halili, Rigels; Hysa, Armanda; Pudar Draško, Gazela; Pavlović, Aleksandar

(Prishtinë : Qendra Multimedia, 2016)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Halili, Rigels
AU  - Hysa, Armanda
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Pavlović, Aleksandar
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1615
AB  - The volume contains a selection of articles written during the international project “Figuring Out the Enemy: Re-imagining Serbian-Albanian Relations” (2014-2016). Containing 13 reviewed articles previously published in Serbian or Albanian, this is one of the first joint research initiatives, involving twenty eight scholars and intellectuals solely from Serbia, Kosovo and Albania, putting forward critically oriented initiatives and alternatives to current hostilities. The project’s mission was to engage scholars from national communities at stake instead of bringing them from aside, and to provide environment for discussion and mutual understanding. The project created a base for lasting cooperation and a strong network of scholars, intellectuals, but also cultural institutions from Serbia, Kosovo and Albania.
The edited volume “Figuring Out the Enemy: Re-imagining Serbian-Albanian Relations” challenges Serbian-Albanian hostility by reinvestigating events and discourses from the past as well as more recent times. It seeks to identify and elaborate common views, ideas and traditions that undermine the present enmity and promote cooperation. These articles therefore offer an alternative to the dominant discourse of hostility and centennial ethnic hatred between the two nations. It also aims to bridge the existent gap in comparative research on Serbian-Albanian issues that has resulted in a serious lack of joint research projects, cooperation and other cultural activities.
PB  - Prishtinë : Qendra Multimedia
T1  - Figura e armikut: ripërfytyrimi i marrëdhënieve shqiptaro-serbe
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Halili, Rigels and Hysa, Armanda and Pudar Draško, Gazela and Pavlović, Aleksandar",
year = "2016",
abstract = "The volume contains a selection of articles written during the international project “Figuring Out the Enemy: Re-imagining Serbian-Albanian Relations” (2014-2016). Containing 13 reviewed articles previously published in Serbian or Albanian, this is one of the first joint research initiatives, involving twenty eight scholars and intellectuals solely from Serbia, Kosovo and Albania, putting forward critically oriented initiatives and alternatives to current hostilities. The project’s mission was to engage scholars from national communities at stake instead of bringing them from aside, and to provide environment for discussion and mutual understanding. The project created a base for lasting cooperation and a strong network of scholars, intellectuals, but also cultural institutions from Serbia, Kosovo and Albania.
The edited volume “Figuring Out the Enemy: Re-imagining Serbian-Albanian Relations” challenges Serbian-Albanian hostility by reinvestigating events and discourses from the past as well as more recent times. It seeks to identify and elaborate common views, ideas and traditions that undermine the present enmity and promote cooperation. These articles therefore offer an alternative to the dominant discourse of hostility and centennial ethnic hatred between the two nations. It also aims to bridge the existent gap in comparative research on Serbian-Albanian issues that has resulted in a serious lack of joint research projects, cooperation and other cultural activities.",
publisher = "Prishtinë : Qendra Multimedia",
title = "Figura e armikut: ripërfytyrimi i marrëdhënieve shqiptaro-serbe"
}
Halili, R., Hysa, A., Pudar Draško, G.,& Pavlović, A.. (2016). Figura e armikut: ripërfytyrimi i marrëdhënieve shqiptaro-serbe. 
Prishtinë : Qendra Multimedia..
Halili R, Hysa A, Pudar Draško G, Pavlović A. Figura e armikut: ripërfytyrimi i marrëdhënieve shqiptaro-serbe. 2016;..
Halili, Rigels, Hysa, Armanda, Pudar Draško, Gazela, Pavlović, Aleksandar, "Figura e armikut: ripërfytyrimi i marrëdhënieve shqiptaro-serbe" (2016).

A Question Mark over Education: Introduction into the Aporias of Contemporary Educational Theory and Praxis

Krstić, Predrag; Petrović Trifunović, Tamara; Pudar Draško, Gazela

(Newcastle upon Tyne : Cambridge Scholars, 2016)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
AU  - Petrović Trifunović, Tamara
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://www.cambridgescholars.com/download/sample/63399
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1516
AB  - Why Still Education? will appeal to researchers of education – scholars and students alike – in the fields of philosophy, sociology, pedagogy, andragogy, psychology, political theory, anthropology, and history, as well as experts in education management and educational practitioners, such as teachers and textbook authors. The question posed by the title is separated in the book into three more specific questions; the first of which, titled “Education for What?”, investigates the eternal issue the purpose of education. The second section, which examines the most appropriate approaches and expected outcomes for a child-centred perspective, is called “Education for Whom?”; and the third part, “Whose Education?”, takes national, gender and other subtle or self-explanatory characteristics of education and looks at them from the standpoint of discrimination. The volume offers nine different chapters, which provide illuminating and interesting answers to these questions, and, thus, allow them to be more thoroughly resolved and enable rational discourse about them.
PB  - Newcastle upon Tyne : Cambridge Scholars
T2  - Why Still Education
T1  - A Question Mark over Education: Introduction into the Aporias of Contemporary Educational Theory and Praxis
SP  - 1
EP  - 5
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Krstić, Predrag and Petrović Trifunović, Tamara and Pudar Draško, Gazela",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Why Still Education? will appeal to researchers of education – scholars and students alike – in the fields of philosophy, sociology, pedagogy, andragogy, psychology, political theory, anthropology, and history, as well as experts in education management and educational practitioners, such as teachers and textbook authors. The question posed by the title is separated in the book into three more specific questions; the first of which, titled “Education for What?”, investigates the eternal issue the purpose of education. The second section, which examines the most appropriate approaches and expected outcomes for a child-centred perspective, is called “Education for Whom?”; and the third part, “Whose Education?”, takes national, gender and other subtle or self-explanatory characteristics of education and looks at them from the standpoint of discrimination. The volume offers nine different chapters, which provide illuminating and interesting answers to these questions, and, thus, allow them to be more thoroughly resolved and enable rational discourse about them.",
publisher = "Newcastle upon Tyne : Cambridge Scholars",
journal = "Why Still Education",
booktitle = "A Question Mark over Education: Introduction into the Aporias of Contemporary Educational Theory and Praxis",
pages = "1-5"
}
Krstić, P., Petrović Trifunović, T.,& Pudar Draško, G.. (2016). A Question Mark over Education: Introduction into the Aporias of Contemporary Educational Theory and Praxis. in Why Still Education
Newcastle upon Tyne : Cambridge Scholars., 1-5.
Krstić P, Petrović Trifunović T, Pudar Draško G. A Question Mark over Education: Introduction into the Aporias of Contemporary Educational Theory and Praxis. in Why Still Education. 2016;:1-5..
Krstić, Predrag, Petrović Trifunović, Tamara, Pudar Draško, Gazela, "A Question Mark over Education: Introduction into the Aporias of Contemporary Educational Theory and Praxis" in Why Still Education (2016):1-5.