TY  - JOUR
AU  - Burç, Rosa
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/fid/article/view/882
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2150
AB  - The Kurdish-led autonomous entity called Autonomous Administration 
of North and East Syria (NES) – also known as Rojava – considers women’s 
liberation an imperative condition for shaping a democratic society. The 
practice of autonomy in NES shares strong resemblances with Non Territorial Autonomy (NTA) models; however, it introduces a novelty in 
the role of women as active agents in building a plurinational democracy. This 
paper examines (1) the intellectual and political origins of the political 
role ascribed to women in autonomous administrations and (2) how the 
practice of autonomy in Rojava has advanced women’s rights by shedding 
light on both institutional implementation of women’s rights, as well as 
the creation of (non)-territorial spaces of women’s emancipation within 
the autonomous model. The argument made is that the conceptual 
framework of the Rojava model goes beyond the Kurdish question and 
can be considered an attempt to resolve a democratic deficit of liberal 
democratic nation-states through bringing together solutions that address 
the intertwined subordination of minorities and women.
AB  - Autonomna oblast pod upravom Kurda zvaničnog naziva Autonomna uprava Severne i Istoč ne Sirije (NES) – takođe poznata i kao Rožava – smatra oslobođenje žena kao imperativ za 
oblikovanje demokratskog društva. Autonomne prakse u NES jako podsećaju na neteritori jalne (NTA) modele, ali takođe unose i novine u vidu uloge žena kao aktivnih činilaca u iz gradnji plurinacionalne demokratije. Ovaj rad razmatra (1) intelektualno i političko poreklo 
političke uloge dodeljene ženama u autonomnoj upravi, i (2) način na koji su autonomne 
prakse u Rožavi unapredile prava žena time što su bacile svetlost kako na institucionalnu 
primenu ženskih prava, tako i na stvaranje (ne)teritorijalnih prostora ženske emancipacije 
unutar autonomnog modela. Iznosi se tvrdnja da konceptualni okvir Rožava modela preva zilazi kurdsko pitanje i može se posmatrati kao pokušaj da se reši problem demokratskog 
deficita liberalnih demokratskih nacija-država putem objedinjavanja rešenja koja se odnose 
na isprepletene oblike podređenosti manjina i žena.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Non-territorial autonomy and gender equality: The case of the autonomous administration of north and east Syria - Rojava
T1  - Neteritorijalna autonomija i rodna ravnopravnost:  slučaj Autonomne uprave Severne i Istočne Sirije – Rožave
IS  - 3
VL  - 31
SP  - 319
EP  - 339
DO  - 10.2298/FID2003319B
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Burç, Rosa",
year = "2020",
abstract = "The Kurdish-led autonomous entity called Autonomous Administration 
of North and East Syria (NES) – also known as Rojava – considers women’s 
liberation an imperative condition for shaping a democratic society. The 
practice of autonomy in NES shares strong resemblances with Non Territorial Autonomy (NTA) models; however, it introduces a novelty in 
the role of women as active agents in building a plurinational democracy. This 
paper examines (1) the intellectual and political origins of the political 
role ascribed to women in autonomous administrations and (2) how the 
practice of autonomy in Rojava has advanced women’s rights by shedding 
light on both institutional implementation of women’s rights, as well as 
the creation of (non)-territorial spaces of women’s emancipation within 
the autonomous model. The argument made is that the conceptual 
framework of the Rojava model goes beyond the Kurdish question and 
can be considered an attempt to resolve a democratic deficit of liberal 
democratic nation-states through bringing together solutions that address 
the intertwined subordination of minorities and women., Autonomna oblast pod upravom Kurda zvaničnog naziva Autonomna uprava Severne i Istoč ne Sirije (NES) – takođe poznata i kao Rožava – smatra oslobođenje žena kao imperativ za 
oblikovanje demokratskog društva. Autonomne prakse u NES jako podsećaju na neteritori jalne (NTA) modele, ali takođe unose i novine u vidu uloge žena kao aktivnih činilaca u iz gradnji plurinacionalne demokratije. Ovaj rad razmatra (1) intelektualno i političko poreklo 
političke uloge dodeljene ženama u autonomnoj upravi, i (2) način na koji su autonomne 
prakse u Rožavi unapredile prava žena time što su bacile svetlost kako na institucionalnu 
primenu ženskih prava, tako i na stvaranje (ne)teritorijalnih prostora ženske emancipacije 
unutar autonomnog modela. Iznosi se tvrdnja da konceptualni okvir Rožava modela preva zilazi kurdsko pitanje i može se posmatrati kao pokušaj da se reši problem demokratskog 
deficita liberalnih demokratskih nacija-država putem objedinjavanja rešenja koja se odnose 
na isprepletene oblike podređenosti manjina i žena.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Non-territorial autonomy and gender equality: The case of the autonomous administration of north and east Syria - Rojava, Neteritorijalna autonomija i rodna ravnopravnost:  slučaj Autonomne uprave Severne i Istočne Sirije – Rožave",
number = "3",
volume = "31",
pages = "319-339",
doi = "10.2298/FID2003319B"
}

Burç, R.. (2020). Non-territorial autonomy and gender equality: The case of the autonomous administration of north and east Syria - Rojava. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 31(3), 319-339.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2003319B

Burç R. Non-territorial autonomy and gender equality: The case of the autonomous administration of north and east Syria - Rojava. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2020;31(3):319-339.
doi:10.2298/FID2003319B .

Burç, Rosa, "Non-territorial autonomy and gender equality: The case of the autonomous administration of north and east Syria - Rojava" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 31, no. 3 (2020):319-339,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2003319B . .