Pudar Draško, Gazela

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
3eec913c-b4fe-4085-8409-a7dd0aac7faf
  • Pudar Draško, Gazela (8)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Intellectuals between radicalization and reconciliation in the Western Balkans

Pudar Draško, Gazela; Pavlović, Aleksandar

(Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2020)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Pavlović, Aleksandar
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2457
AB  - According to cultural definitions, intellectuals can be defined as social actors who have developed public authority based on cultural achievements and/or positions. Intellectuals are key participants in the creation, specification, articulation and dissemination of any form of social ideas. Their relevance can be particularly prominent in societies dominated by nationalism, because they have the ability to sift through a particular national/ethnic tradition, selecting specific moments and elements from the collective memory and thus strengthening a given national ideology. In the Westerns Balkans, intellectual elites mostly positioned themselves as bearers of national programs, especially in the 1980s and 1990s. This, almost exclusively male, group was awarded disproportionately large space in the media. Smaller groups of a(nti)nationally oriented intellectuals never gained such dominance in public discourse, but continuously used their opportunities of influencing public opinion to express the necessity of repudiation of extremism and breaking with the ideology that hampers the normalization of socio-political life in the region. We analyze here the role of intellectuals to both radicalization and reconciliation in the Western Balkans, focusing especially on the former Yugoslavia. Starting with the 1987 Memorandum of the SASA, widely regarded as the ultimate intellectual fuel to the deepening the conflict, we end with the most recent case of Declaration on the Common Language (2017), which opted for the unification of the now separated Western Balkan languages into a joint one.
PB  - Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft
T2  - The Challenges of Democratization and Reconciliation in the Post-Yugoslav Space
T1  - Intellectuals between radicalization and reconciliation in the Western Balkans
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Pudar Draško, Gazela and Pavlović, Aleksandar",
year = "2020",
abstract = "According to cultural definitions, intellectuals can be defined as social actors who have developed public authority based on cultural achievements and/or positions. Intellectuals are key participants in the creation, specification, articulation and dissemination of any form of social ideas. Their relevance can be particularly prominent in societies dominated by nationalism, because they have the ability to sift through a particular national/ethnic tradition, selecting specific moments and elements from the collective memory and thus strengthening a given national ideology. In the Westerns Balkans, intellectual elites mostly positioned themselves as bearers of national programs, especially in the 1980s and 1990s. This, almost exclusively male, group was awarded disproportionately large space in the media. Smaller groups of a(nti)nationally oriented intellectuals never gained such dominance in public discourse, but continuously used their opportunities of influencing public opinion to express the necessity of repudiation of extremism and breaking with the ideology that hampers the normalization of socio-political life in the region. We analyze here the role of intellectuals to both radicalization and reconciliation in the Western Balkans, focusing especially on the former Yugoslavia. Starting with the 1987 Memorandum of the SASA, widely regarded as the ultimate intellectual fuel to the deepening the conflict, we end with the most recent case of Declaration on the Common Language (2017), which opted for the unification of the now separated Western Balkan languages into a joint one.",
publisher = "Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft",
journal = "The Challenges of Democratization and Reconciliation in the Post-Yugoslav Space",
booktitle = "Intellectuals between radicalization and reconciliation in the Western Balkans"
}
Pudar Draško, G.,& Pavlović, A.. (2020). Intellectuals between radicalization and reconciliation in the Western Balkans. in The Challenges of Democratization and Reconciliation in the Post-Yugoslav Space
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft..
Pudar Draško G, Pavlović A. Intellectuals between radicalization and reconciliation in the Western Balkans. in The Challenges of Democratization and Reconciliation in the Post-Yugoslav Space. 2020;..
Pudar Draško, Gazela, Pavlović, Aleksandar, "Intellectuals between radicalization and reconciliation in the Western Balkans" in The Challenges of Democratization and Reconciliation in the Post-Yugoslav Space (2020).

Otpor ka politici

Pudar Draško, Gazela; Delibašić, Balša

(Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka, 2020)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Delibašić, Balša
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2327
AB  - Razlozi izostanka šire građanske antiautoritarne mobilizacije u savremenoj Srbiji mogu biti jasniji ukoliko se temeljnije osvrnemo na uslove nastajanja i nestajanja pokreta Otpor, nosioca značajnog dela aktivnosti koje su prethodile i vodile petooktobarskim promenama. Uporednom analizom dostupnih istraživanja među nekadašnjim članstvom Otpora i aktivistima savremenih
pokreta pokazaćemo značajne sličnosti u percepciji političkog konteksta između 2000. i kraja druge decenije XXI veka. Sa druge strane, kontekstualna analiza ukazuje na značajne razlike između ova dva vremenska trenutka u pogledu moći delanja (agency) angažovanih aktera u političkoj areni Srbije. Uspeh Otpora u stvaranju efikasnog zajedničkog subjekta promena, bez obzira na ideološku heterogenost članova pokreta, nužno je razmotriti u protivstavu sa neuspehom njegovog opstanka kao društvenog i/ili političkog aktera upravo zbog te heterogenosti. Možemo li govoriti o naučenim lekcijama, odnosno da li je Otpor u politici paradigma otpora politici građana Srbije?
AB  - The reasons for absence of broad civic anti-authoritarian activism in contemporary Serbia can be gleaned from a closer look at the circumstances of emergence and disappearance of the movement Otpor [Resistance], which played a major role in the lead-up and events of October 5th, 2000. Through a comparative analysis of available studies of former Otpor members, as well as other activists of various movements, we show significant overlap in perception of the political context of 2000 and the end of the 2010s. On the other hand, context analysis also shows significant differences between these two moments regarding the agency of actors on the Serbian political stage. Otpor’s success in producing an efficient common subject of change, despite internal ideological heterogeneity, must be weighed against the counter claim of failure to endure as  social and/or political actor (precisely due to its internal differences). Can we speak of lessons learned? Could Resistance in politics be the source of civic resistance towards politics in Serbia?
PB  - Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka
T2  - Dvadeset godina 5. oktobra
T1  - Otpor ka politici
T1  - Resistance to Politics
SP  - 71
EP  - 88
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Pudar Draško, Gazela and Delibašić, Balša",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Razlozi izostanka šire građanske antiautoritarne mobilizacije u savremenoj Srbiji mogu biti jasniji ukoliko se temeljnije osvrnemo na uslove nastajanja i nestajanja pokreta Otpor, nosioca značajnog dela aktivnosti koje su prethodile i vodile petooktobarskim promenama. Uporednom analizom dostupnih istraživanja među nekadašnjim članstvom Otpora i aktivistima savremenih
pokreta pokazaćemo značajne sličnosti u percepciji političkog konteksta između 2000. i kraja druge decenije XXI veka. Sa druge strane, kontekstualna analiza ukazuje na značajne razlike između ova dva vremenska trenutka u pogledu moći delanja (agency) angažovanih aktera u političkoj areni Srbije. Uspeh Otpora u stvaranju efikasnog zajedničkog subjekta promena, bez obzira na ideološku heterogenost članova pokreta, nužno je razmotriti u protivstavu sa neuspehom njegovog opstanka kao društvenog i/ili političkog aktera upravo zbog te heterogenosti. Možemo li govoriti o naučenim lekcijama, odnosno da li je Otpor u politici paradigma otpora politici građana Srbije?, The reasons for absence of broad civic anti-authoritarian activism in contemporary Serbia can be gleaned from a closer look at the circumstances of emergence and disappearance of the movement Otpor [Resistance], which played a major role in the lead-up and events of October 5th, 2000. Through a comparative analysis of available studies of former Otpor members, as well as other activists of various movements, we show significant overlap in perception of the political context of 2000 and the end of the 2010s. On the other hand, context analysis also shows significant differences between these two moments regarding the agency of actors on the Serbian political stage. Otpor’s success in producing an efficient common subject of change, despite internal ideological heterogeneity, must be weighed against the counter claim of failure to endure as  social and/or political actor (precisely due to its internal differences). Can we speak of lessons learned? Could Resistance in politics be the source of civic resistance towards politics in Serbia?",
publisher = "Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka",
journal = "Dvadeset godina 5. oktobra",
booktitle = "Otpor ka politici, Resistance to Politics",
pages = "71-88"
}
Pudar Draško, G.,& Delibašić, B.. (2020). Otpor ka politici. in Dvadeset godina 5. oktobra
Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu - Fakultet političkih nauka., 71-88.
Pudar Draško G, Delibašić B. Otpor ka politici. in Dvadeset godina 5. oktobra. 2020;:71-88..
Pudar Draško, Gazela, Delibašić, Balša, "Otpor ka politici" in Dvadeset godina 5. oktobra (2020):71-88.

Otete institucije u Srbiji

Velinov, Marija; Pudar Draško, Gazela; Prodanović, Srđan

(Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2019)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Velinov, Marija
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2383
PB  - Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - Otete institucije u Srbiji
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Velinov, Marija and Pudar Draško, Gazela and Prodanović, Srđan",
year = "2019",
publisher = "Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "Otete institucije u Srbiji"
}
Velinov, M., Pudar Draško, G.,& Prodanović, S.. (2019). Otete institucije u Srbiji. 
Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
Velinov M, Pudar Draško G, Prodanović S. Otete institucije u Srbiji. 2019;..
Velinov, Marija, Pudar Draško, Gazela, Prodanović, Srđan, "Otete institucije u Srbiji" (2019).

The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative

Fiket, Irena; Ivković, Marjan; Pudar Draško, Gazela; Vasiljević, Jelena

(Coordinamento SIBA - University of Salento, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Ivković, Marjan
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2044
AB  - The main focus of our paper is on a specific form of democratic discourse, used in different types of social engagement actions (petitions, speeches, intellectual engagement, ad hoc citizens' protests, social movements etc.), that attempts to politicize a certain issue by challenging the neoliberal principle of instrumentalism which argues that democratic procedures can legitimately be abandoned in the name of the greater efficiency of socioeconomic development. Therefore, we start from identifying the discourse of "neoliberal instrumentalism" and its relative success in delegitimizing the welfare state and mechanisms of democratic decision making and we formulate a conceptual model of a democratic counter-narrative named "anti-instrumentalist discourse". Through empirical analyses of discourse used by We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, that mobilized against the Serbian government's urban project Belgrade Waterfront we try to illustrate the applicability and the heuristic value of the proposed model. The data for the analyses were collected through 1) desk analysis of available secondary data on the Belgrade Waterfront project, 2) official statements and proclamations of the We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, 3) semi-structured interviews with four core members of the initiative.
PB  - Coordinamento SIBA - University of Salento
T2  - Partecipazione E Conflitto
T1  - The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative
IS  - 3
VL  - 12
SP  - 898
EP  - 918
DO  - DOI: 10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Fiket, Irena and Ivković, Marjan and Pudar Draško, Gazela and Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2019",
abstract = "The main focus of our paper is on a specific form of democratic discourse, used in different types of social engagement actions (petitions, speeches, intellectual engagement, ad hoc citizens' protests, social movements etc.), that attempts to politicize a certain issue by challenging the neoliberal principle of instrumentalism which argues that democratic procedures can legitimately be abandoned in the name of the greater efficiency of socioeconomic development. Therefore, we start from identifying the discourse of "neoliberal instrumentalism" and its relative success in delegitimizing the welfare state and mechanisms of democratic decision making and we formulate a conceptual model of a democratic counter-narrative named "anti-instrumentalist discourse". Through empirical analyses of discourse used by We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, that mobilized against the Serbian government's urban project Belgrade Waterfront we try to illustrate the applicability and the heuristic value of the proposed model. The data for the analyses were collected through 1) desk analysis of available secondary data on the Belgrade Waterfront project, 2) official statements and proclamations of the We Won't Let Belgrade D(r)own initiative, 3) semi-structured interviews with four core members of the initiative.",
publisher = "Coordinamento SIBA - University of Salento",
journal = "Partecipazione E Conflitto",
title = "The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative",
number = "3",
volume = "12",
pages = "898-918",
doi = "DOI: 10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898"
}
Fiket, I., Ivković, M., Pudar Draško, G.,& Vasiljević, J.. (2019). The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative. in Partecipazione E Conflitto
Coordinamento SIBA - University of Salento., 12(3), 898-918.
https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898
Fiket I, Ivković M, Pudar Draško G, Vasiljević J. The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative. in Partecipazione E Conflitto. 2019;12(3):898-918.
doi:DOI: 10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898 .
Fiket, Irena, Ivković, Marjan, Pudar Draško, Gazela, Vasiljević, Jelena, "The discourse of anti-instrumentalism: exploring a conceptual model through the case study of the We won’t let Belgrade d(r)own initiative" in Partecipazione E Conflitto, 12, no. 3 (2019):898-918,
https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1285/i20356609v12i3p898 . .

Big dreams and small steps: comparative perspectives on the social movement struggle for democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia

Pudar Draško, Gazela; Fiket, Irena; Vasiljević, Jelena

(Taylor & Francis Online, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Fiket, Irena
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317?journalCode=fbss20
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2021
AB  - This paper provides a comparative analysis of social movements’ characteristics and capacities to struggle against illiberal tendencies and incite political change in Serbia and North Macedonia. First, we discuss the illiberal elements of political regimes in the countries in question, Serbia and North Macedonia. Then, we provide a comprehensive overview of progressive social movements in the two countries, formed and organized as a response to different authoritarian and non-democratic tendencies. Finally, we point to some differences in their organizing, coalition-forging and issue-defining principles, which, we believe, may help to explain the relative success of social movements in North Macedonia in producing relevant political outcomes, compared to the weak political impact of social movements in Serbia. Empirical data were collected during the summer of 2018 through in-depth interviews with members of social movements in North Macedonia and Serbia.
PB  - Taylor & Francis Online
T2  - Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
T1  - Big dreams and small steps: comparative perspectives on the social movement struggle for democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia
DO  - 10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Pudar Draško, Gazela and Fiket, Irena and Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2019",
abstract = "This paper provides a comparative analysis of social movements’ characteristics and capacities to struggle against illiberal tendencies and incite political change in Serbia and North Macedonia. First, we discuss the illiberal elements of political regimes in the countries in question, Serbia and North Macedonia. Then, we provide a comprehensive overview of progressive social movements in the two countries, formed and organized as a response to different authoritarian and non-democratic tendencies. Finally, we point to some differences in their organizing, coalition-forging and issue-defining principles, which, we believe, may help to explain the relative success of social movements in North Macedonia in producing relevant political outcomes, compared to the weak political impact of social movements in Serbia. Empirical data were collected during the summer of 2018 through in-depth interviews with members of social movements in North Macedonia and Serbia.",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Online",
journal = "Southeast European and Black Sea Studies",
title = "Big dreams and small steps: comparative perspectives on the social movement struggle for democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia",
doi = "10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317"
}
Pudar Draško, G., Fiket, I.,& Vasiljević, J.. (2019). Big dreams and small steps: comparative perspectives on the social movement struggle for democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia. in Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
Taylor & Francis Online..
https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317
Pudar Draško G, Fiket I, Vasiljević J. Big dreams and small steps: comparative perspectives on the social movement struggle for democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia. in Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. 2019;.
doi:10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317 .
Pudar Draško, Gazela, Fiket, Irena, Vasiljević, Jelena, "Big dreams and small steps: comparative perspectives on the social movement struggle for democracy in Serbia and North Macedonia" in Southeast European and Black Sea Studies (2019),
https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2019.1654317 . .
10
3
4
4

Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations Figuring out the Enemy

Pavlović, Aleksandar; Pudar Draško, Gazela; Halili, Rigels

(London: Routledge, 2019)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Pavlović, Aleksandar
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
AU  - Halili, Rigels
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2004
AB  - Identifying and explaining common views, ideas and traditions, this volume challenges the concept of Serbian-Albanian hostility by reinvestigating recent and historical events in the region. The contributors put forward critically oriented initiatives and alternatives to shed light on a range of relations and perspectives.

The central aim of the book is to ‘figure out’ the problematic relations between Serbs and Albanians – that is, to comprehend its origins and the actors involved, and to find ways to resolve and deal with this enmity. Treating the hostility as a construct of a long-running discourse about the Serbian or Albanian ‘Other’, scholars and intellectuals from Serbia, Kosovo and Albania examine the origins, channels, agents and mediums of this discourse from the 18th century to the present. Tracing the roots of the two ethnic groups' political divisions, contemporary practices and actions allows the contributors to reconsider mutually held negative perceptions and identify elements of a common, shared history. Examples of past and current cooperation are used to offer a critical analysis of all three societies.

This interdisciplinary publication brings together historiographical, literary, sociological, political, anthropological and philosophical analyses and enquiries and will be of interest to researchers in the fields of sociology, politics, cultural studies, history or anthropology; and to academics working in Slavonic and East European studies.
PB  - London: Routledge
T2  - Routledge, London; Southeast European Studies Series
T1  - Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations Figuring out the Enemy
DO  - https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351273169
ER  - 
@book{
author = "Pavlović, Aleksandar and Pudar Draško, Gazela and Halili, Rigels",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Identifying and explaining common views, ideas and traditions, this volume challenges the concept of Serbian-Albanian hostility by reinvestigating recent and historical events in the region. The contributors put forward critically oriented initiatives and alternatives to shed light on a range of relations and perspectives.

The central aim of the book is to ‘figure out’ the problematic relations between Serbs and Albanians – that is, to comprehend its origins and the actors involved, and to find ways to resolve and deal with this enmity. Treating the hostility as a construct of a long-running discourse about the Serbian or Albanian ‘Other’, scholars and intellectuals from Serbia, Kosovo and Albania examine the origins, channels, agents and mediums of this discourse from the 18th century to the present. Tracing the roots of the two ethnic groups' political divisions, contemporary practices and actions allows the contributors to reconsider mutually held negative perceptions and identify elements of a common, shared history. Examples of past and current cooperation are used to offer a critical analysis of all three societies.

This interdisciplinary publication brings together historiographical, literary, sociological, political, anthropological and philosophical analyses and enquiries and will be of interest to researchers in the fields of sociology, politics, cultural studies, history or anthropology; and to academics working in Slavonic and East European studies.",
publisher = "London: Routledge",
journal = "Routledge, London; Southeast European Studies Series",
title = "Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations Figuring out the Enemy",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351273169"
}
Pavlović, A., Pudar Draško, G.,& Halili, R.. (2019). Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations Figuring out the Enemy. in Routledge, London; Southeast European Studies Series
London: Routledge..
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351273169
Pavlović A, Pudar Draško G, Halili R. Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations Figuring out the Enemy. in Routledge, London; Southeast European Studies Series. 2019;.
doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351273169 .
Pavlović, Aleksandar, Pudar Draško, Gazela, Halili, Rigels, "Rethinking Serbian-Albanian Relations Figuring out the Enemy" in Routledge, London; Southeast European Studies Series (2019),
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351273169 . .

Che cos’è la polizia? L’istituzione della violenza universale e la violenza dell’universale

Bojanić, Petar; Pudar Draško, Gazela

(Milano : La Nuova Italia Editrice, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bojanić, Petar
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2037
PB  - Milano : La Nuova Italia Editrice
T2  - Aut Aut
T1  - Che cos’è la polizia? L’istituzione della violenza universale e la violenza dell’universale
IS  - 384
SP  - 94
EP  - 112
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar and Pudar Draško, Gazela",
year = "2019",
publisher = "Milano : La Nuova Italia Editrice",
journal = "Aut Aut",
title = "Che cos’è la polizia? L’istituzione della violenza universale e la violenza dell’universale",
number = "384",
pages = "94-112"
}
Bojanić, P.,& Pudar Draško, G.. (2019). Che cos’è la polizia? L’istituzione della violenza universale e la violenza dell’universale. in Aut Aut
Milano : La Nuova Italia Editrice.(384), 94-112.
Bojanić P, Pudar Draško G. Che cos’è la polizia? L’istituzione della violenza universale e la violenza dell’universale. in Aut Aut. 2019;(384):94-112..
Bojanić, Petar, Pudar Draško, Gazela, "Che cos’è la polizia? L’istituzione della violenza universale e la violenza dell’universale" in Aut Aut, no. 384 (2019):94-112.

Otuđenost između institucionalizacije i prakse

Velinov, Marija; Prodanović, Srđan; Pudar Draško, Gazela

(Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2019)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Velinov, Marija
AU  - Prodanović, Srđan
AU  - Pudar Draško, Gazela
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2059
PB  - Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Otete institucije u Srbiji: teorija i praksa
T1  - Otuđenost između institucionalizacije i prakse
SP  - 6
EP  - 12
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Velinov, Marija and Prodanović, Srđan and Pudar Draško, Gazela",
year = "2019",
publisher = "Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Otete institucije u Srbiji: teorija i praksa",
booktitle = "Otuđenost između institucionalizacije i prakse",
pages = "6-12"
}
Velinov, M., Prodanović, S.,& Pudar Draško, G.. (2019). Otuđenost između institucionalizacije i prakse. in Otete institucije u Srbiji: teorija i praksa
Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 6-12.
Velinov M, Prodanović S, Pudar Draško G. Otuđenost između institucionalizacije i prakse. in Otete institucije u Srbiji: teorija i praksa. 2019;:6-12..
Velinov, Marija, Prodanović, Srđan, Pudar Draško, Gazela, "Otuđenost između institucionalizacije i prakse" in Otete institucije u Srbiji: teorija i praksa (2019):6-12.