Sort By
Publication Year
Deposit Date
Title
Type
Access
Publication Year
2020 (1)
2012 (1)
Type
Version
Access

Janković, Ivana

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
cc749fcd-9f1c-458a-b851-f08555f1fe03
  • Janković, Ivana (2)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Epistemic Feature of Democracy: the Role of Expert in Democratic Decision Making

Janković, Ivana

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2020)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Janković, Ivana
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID2001037J
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2065
AB  - In her book Democracy and Truth: The Conflict between Political and Epistemic Virtues, Snježana Prijić Samaržija advocates that a purely procedural justification which defines the authority and legitimacy of democracy only in relation to the fairness of the procedure itself is not enough for a full justification of democracy. Some epistemic values should also be included. This epistemic quality of democracy depends on the quality of the decisions that the democratic procedures produce. In that sense, the author is advocating a hybrid theory that secures harmony between political and epistemic values, favoring deliberative procedure for this purpose, and thus promotes equal respect for both democratic values. In doing so, she is advocating the specific type of division of epistemic labor that I will attempt to critically re-examine here, as well as to bring into question the privileged role of the experts in democratic decision-making.
AB  - U svojoj knjizi Demokratija i istina: sukob između političkih i epistemičkih vrlina, Snježana Prijić Samaržija se zalaže za stanovište po kom čisto proceduralno opravdanje, koje definiše autoritet i legitimnost demokratije samo u odnosu na pravičnost same procedure, nije dovoljno za potpuno opravdanje demokratije i da, stoga, treba uključiti i neke epistemičke vrednosti. Ova epistemička vrednost demokratije zavisi od kvaliteta odluka koje demokratske procedure proizvode. U tom smislu autorka se zalaže za hibirnu teoriju koja obezbeđuje sklad između političkih i epistemičkih vrednosti, favorizujući deliberativnu proceduru za tu svrhu, i na taj način promoviše jednako poštovanje obe demokratske vrednosti. Pri tome, autorka zagovara specifičnu vrstu epsitemičke podele rada koju ću ovde pokušati da kritički preispitam, a samim tim i izolovanu ulogu eskperata u demokratskom odlučivanju.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Epistemic Feature of Democracy: the Role of Expert in Democratic Decision Making
T1  - Epistemička odlika demokratije: uloga eksperta u demokratskom donošenju odluka
IS  - 1
VL  - 31
SP  - 37
EP  - 42
DO  - https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2001037J
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Janković, Ivana",
year = "2020",
url = "http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID2001037J, http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2065",
abstract = "In her book Democracy and Truth: The Conflict between Political and Epistemic Virtues, Snježana Prijić Samaržija advocates that a purely procedural justification which defines the authority and legitimacy of democracy only in relation to the fairness of the procedure itself is not enough for a full justification of democracy. Some epistemic values should also be included. This epistemic quality of democracy depends on the quality of the decisions that the democratic procedures produce. In that sense, the author is advocating a hybrid theory that secures harmony between political and epistemic values, favoring deliberative procedure for this purpose, and thus promotes equal respect for both democratic values. In doing so, she is advocating the specific type of division of epistemic labor that I will attempt to critically re-examine here, as well as to bring into question the privileged role of the experts in democratic decision-making., U svojoj knjizi Demokratija i istina: sukob između političkih i epistemičkih vrlina, Snježana Prijić Samaržija se zalaže za stanovište po kom čisto proceduralno opravdanje, koje definiše autoritet i legitimnost demokratije samo u odnosu na pravičnost same procedure, nije dovoljno za potpuno opravdanje demokratije i da, stoga, treba uključiti i neke epistemičke vrednosti. Ova epistemička vrednost demokratije zavisi od kvaliteta odluka koje demokratske procedure proizvode. U tom smislu autorka se zalaže za hibirnu teoriju koja obezbeđuje sklad između političkih i epistemičkih vrednosti, favorizujući deliberativnu proceduru za tu svrhu, i na taj način promoviše jednako poštovanje obe demokratske vrednosti. Pri tome, autorka zagovara specifičnu vrstu epsitemičke podele rada koju ću ovde pokušati da kritički preispitam, a samim tim i izolovanu ulogu eskperata u demokratskom odlučivanju.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Epistemic Feature of Democracy: the Role of Expert in Democratic Decision Making, Epistemička odlika demokratije: uloga eksperta u demokratskom donošenju odluka",
number = "1",
volume = "31",
pages = "37-42",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2001037J"
}
Janković, I. (2020). Epistemička odlika demokratije: uloga eksperta u demokratskom donošenju odluka.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and SocietyBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 31(1), 37-42.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2001037J
Janković I. Epistemička odlika demokratije: uloga eksperta u demokratskom donošenju odluka. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2020;31(1):37-42
Janković Ivana, "Epistemička odlika demokratije: uloga eksperta u demokratskom donošenju odluka" 31, no. 1 (2020):37-42,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2001037J .

Deliberativna demokratija i problem njene praktične primene

Milidrag, Predrag; Janković, Ivana

(2012)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Janković, Ivana
PY  - 2012
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/415
AB  - Deliberative democracy holds that, for a democratic decision to be legitimate, it must be preceded by deliberation among decision-makers. This means that democratic decision cannot be merely the aggregation of preferences that occurs in voting. Thus, citizens may change their initial opinions and preferences as a result of the reflection induced by deliberative communication and by taking into account other people’s opinions. The aim of this paper is to outline the view of deliberative democracy developed by Amy Gutmann and Dennis Thompson as well as to address some of the concerns raised by the critics regarding its practical implementation.
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Deliberativna demokratija i problem njene praktične primene
T1  - Deliberative Democracy and the Problem of its Practical Implementation
SP  - 187
EP  - 202
DO  - 10.2298/FID1202187J
ER  - 
@article{
editor = "Milidrag, Predrag",
author = "Janković, Ivana",
year = "2012",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/415",
abstract = "Deliberative democracy holds that, for a democratic decision to be legitimate, it must be preceded by deliberation among decision-makers. This means that democratic decision cannot be merely the aggregation of preferences that occurs in voting. Thus, citizens may change their initial opinions and preferences as a result of the reflection induced by deliberative communication and by taking into account other people’s opinions. The aim of this paper is to outline the view of deliberative democracy developed by Amy Gutmann and Dennis Thompson as well as to address some of the concerns raised by the critics regarding its practical implementation.",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Deliberativna demokratija i problem njene praktične primene, Deliberative Democracy and the Problem of its Practical Implementation",
pages = "187-202",
doi = "10.2298/FID1202187J"
}
Milidrag, P.,& Janković, I. (2012). Deliberative Democracy and the Problem of its Practical Implementation.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 187-202.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1202187J
Milidrag P, Janković I. Deliberative Democracy and the Problem of its Practical Implementation. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2012;:187-202
Milidrag Predrag, Janković Ivana, "Deliberative Democracy and the Problem of its Practical Implementation" (2012):187-202,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1202187J .