Sort By
Publication Year
Deposit Date
Title
Type
Access
Publication Year
2020 (2)
2019 (1)
2017 (1)
2013 (1)
2010 (1)
Type
Version
Access

Popović, Una

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
35a0cac5-a3b9-4836-b0a7-56de6ee58661
  • Popović, Una (6)
Projects
No records found.

Author's Bibliography

Prostor, mesto i stvari. Hajdeger o neegezistencijalnoj prostornosti

Popović, Una

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2020)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Popović, Una
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://kritika.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/kc/article/view/31/122
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2137
AB  - Tema ovog rada je ispitivanje Hajdegerovog razumevanja prostora, u razmaku od njegove rane do pozne filozofije. Pitanje prostora razmo-trićemo na primeru stvari, odnosno bivstvujućih različitih od čoveka, kako u kontekstu fundamentalne ontologije, gde primat ima prostor-nost  tubivstvovanja,  tako  i  u  okvirima  pozne  misli,  gde  se  mišljenje  prostora oslobađa tog primata tubivstvovanja. U radu ćemo analizi-rati Hajdegerove stavove iz Bivstvovanja i vremena, kao i one iz pre-davanja Umetnost i prostor. Ključna nit-vodilja analize biće Hajdege-rova  kritika  tradiranih  koncepcija  prostora,  kao  i  naglašena  inverzija  odnosa mesta i prostora. Analizom navedenih tekstova pokazaćemo da je pitanje neegzistencijalne prostornosti bitno obeležilo Hajdege-rov  otklon  od  pozicija  fundamentalne  ontologije,  ali  i  da  je  njegova  obrada u tim okvirima naznačila osnovne crte dalje razrade razume-vanja bivstvovanja bivstvujućih drugačijih od čoveka. Zaključno, pita-nje neegzistencijalne prostornosti, smatramo, pokazuje se kao poli-gon  razumevanja  takozvanog  kategorijalnog  načina  bivstvovanja,  naročito u poznoj Hajdegerovoj misli.
AB  - The topic of this paper are Heidegger’s conceptions of space and place, with regard to spatiality of a thing, that is, of beings which are different from Dasein. My aim is to show that Heidegger’s understanding of these beings is more important for both his early and later philosophy than it is usually presented in interpretations. Since Heide-gger goes against traditional philosophy, and claims that traditional metaphysics was forged  according  to  the  model  of  non-existential  beings  (things),  his  own  project  is  largely  overshadowed  by  the  primacy  of  Dasein  and  the  question  of  being  as  such.  Accordingly,  the  issue  of  being  of  non-existential,  that  is,  categorial  beings  is  often  seen  only  in  view  of  these  other  two  prominent  problems.  In  this  paper  I  will  try  to  challenge  such  positions  by  analyzing  the  relationship  between  space  and  being  of  non-existential beings, that is, their non-existential spatiality. I will try to show that such non-existential spatiality is at the core of Heidegger’s reflections on existential spatiality of Dasein in Being and Time, and that most of his ideas about non-existen-tial spatiality survive his turn away from fundamental ontology towards his later phi-losophy. To prove this point, I will compare Heidegger’s positions on place and sculp-ture from his later work The Art and Space with his ideas about place and space from Being and Time. Although situated against different background ideas, both of these works  share  at  least  two  important  points  regarding  the  problem  of  space,  namely,  Heidegger’s critique of scientific and traditional philosophical conceptions of space, and the inversion of the relationship between space and place, in favour of place. Re-lying  on  these  two  points,  I  will  try  to  point  out  to  the  specific  changes  between  these two works regarding the issue of space. Finally, Heidegger’s later works, avoid-ing the early primacy of existential spatiality, clearly shows that the issue of space is directly related to the question of being of non-existential beings. Such perspective, in my view, allows for the reexamining of Heidegger’s philosophical strategy in both his later and early philosophy.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva
T1  - Prostor, mesto i stvari. Hajdeger o neegezistencijalnoj prostornosti
T1  - Space, Place and Things. Heidegger on non-existential Spatiality
IS  - 2
VL  - 1
SP  - 251
EP  - 271
DO  - 10.5281/zenodo.4304623
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Popović, Una",
year = "2020",
url = "https://kritika.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/kc/article/view/31/122, http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2137",
abstract = "Tema ovog rada je ispitivanje Hajdegerovog razumevanja prostora, u razmaku od njegove rane do pozne filozofije. Pitanje prostora razmo-trićemo na primeru stvari, odnosno bivstvujućih različitih od čoveka, kako u kontekstu fundamentalne ontologije, gde primat ima prostor-nost  tubivstvovanja,  tako  i  u  okvirima  pozne  misli,  gde  se  mišljenje  prostora oslobađa tog primata tubivstvovanja. U radu ćemo analizi-rati Hajdegerove stavove iz Bivstvovanja i vremena, kao i one iz pre-davanja Umetnost i prostor. Ključna nit-vodilja analize biće Hajdege-rova  kritika  tradiranih  koncepcija  prostora,  kao  i  naglašena  inverzija  odnosa mesta i prostora. Analizom navedenih tekstova pokazaćemo da je pitanje neegzistencijalne prostornosti bitno obeležilo Hajdege-rov  otklon  od  pozicija  fundamentalne  ontologije,  ali  i  da  je  njegova  obrada u tim okvirima naznačila osnovne crte dalje razrade razume-vanja bivstvovanja bivstvujućih drugačijih od čoveka. Zaključno, pita-nje neegzistencijalne prostornosti, smatramo, pokazuje se kao poli-gon  razumevanja  takozvanog  kategorijalnog  načina  bivstvovanja,  naročito u poznoj Hajdegerovoj misli., The topic of this paper are Heidegger’s conceptions of space and place, with regard to spatiality of a thing, that is, of beings which are different from Dasein. My aim is to show that Heidegger’s understanding of these beings is more important for both his early and later philosophy than it is usually presented in interpretations. Since Heide-gger goes against traditional philosophy, and claims that traditional metaphysics was forged  according  to  the  model  of  non-existential  beings  (things),  his  own  project  is  largely  overshadowed  by  the  primacy  of  Dasein  and  the  question  of  being  as  such.  Accordingly,  the  issue  of  being  of  non-existential,  that  is,  categorial  beings  is  often  seen  only  in  view  of  these  other  two  prominent  problems.  In  this  paper  I  will  try  to  challenge  such  positions  by  analyzing  the  relationship  between  space  and  being  of  non-existential beings, that is, their non-existential spatiality. I will try to show that such non-existential spatiality is at the core of Heidegger’s reflections on existential spatiality of Dasein in Being and Time, and that most of his ideas about non-existen-tial spatiality survive his turn away from fundamental ontology towards his later phi-losophy. To prove this point, I will compare Heidegger’s positions on place and sculp-ture from his later work The Art and Space with his ideas about place and space from Being and Time. Although situated against different background ideas, both of these works  share  at  least  two  important  points  regarding  the  problem  of  space,  namely,  Heidegger’s critique of scientific and traditional philosophical conceptions of space, and the inversion of the relationship between space and place, in favour of place. Re-lying  on  these  two  points,  I  will  try  to  point  out  to  the  specific  changes  between  these two works regarding the issue of space. Finally, Heidegger’s later works, avoid-ing the early primacy of existential spatiality, clearly shows that the issue of space is directly related to the question of being of non-existential beings. Such perspective, in my view, allows for the reexamining of Heidegger’s philosophical strategy in both his later and early philosophy.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva",
title = "Prostor, mesto i stvari. Hajdeger o neegezistencijalnoj prostornosti, Space, Place and Things. Heidegger on non-existential Spatiality",
number = "2",
volume = "1",
pages = "251-271",
doi = "10.5281/zenodo.4304623"
}
Popović, U. (2020). Space, Place and Things. Heidegger on non-existential Spatiality.
Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društvaBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 1(2), 251-271.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4304623
Popović U. Space, Place and Things. Heidegger on non-existential Spatiality. Kritika: časopis za filozofiju i teoriju društva. 2020;1(2):251-271
Popović Una, "Space, Place and Things. Heidegger on non-existential Spatiality" 1, no. 2 (2020):251-271,
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4304623 .

The Silence of the Other: the Voice and the Sign

Popović, Una

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2020)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Popović, Una
PY  - 2020
UR  - https://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/fid/article/view/921/743
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2128
AB  - This paper is about the interconnectedness of the realm of language with that of social interactions, constitutive of all human communities. Arguing against the traditional and still present primacy of the rationally based understanding of language, I wish to stress the possibility of another approach to language, strongly related to the question of the Other. Relying on the idea that the Other is a constitutive part of any linguistic situation, I wish to inspect how it is possible for the voice of the Other to be suppressed or silenced, and if that is the case, how we should understand the silence of the Other. The main result of my findings is that the silence of the Other is not only meaningful, but that it can have positive social and political effects, including the enhancement of the sensitivity for the various modalities of the voice of the Other.
AB  - U ovom radu bavimo se povezanošću domena jezika i domena društvenih interakcija, koji konstituišu svaku ljudsku zajednicu. Na pozadini kritike tradicionalnog, pa i sada u mnogome prisutnog primata razumevanja jezika zasnovanog na razumu, nameravamo da istaknemo mogućnost drugačijeg pristupa jeziku, takvog koji je bitno povezan sa pitanjem Drugog. Osla-njajući se na ideju da je Drugi konstitutivni aspekt bilo koje jezičke situacije, želimo da ispi-tamo kako je moguće da glas drugog bude suspendovan ili ućutkan, i – ako je to slučaj – kako bi trebalo da razumemo tišinu Drugog. Ključni rezultat naših analiza je da tišina Drugog nije samo obremenjena značenjem, već da ona može imati pozitivne društvene i političke posle-dice, uključujući tu i unapređivanje senzitivnosti za različite modalitete glasa Drugog.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - The Silence of the Other: the Voice and the Sign
T1  - Tišina drugog: glas i znak
IS  - 4
VL  - 31
SP  - 569
EP  - 576
DO  - 10.2298/FID2004569P
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Popović, Una",
year = "2020",
url = "https://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php/fid/article/view/921/743, http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2128",
abstract = "This paper is about the interconnectedness of the realm of language with that of social interactions, constitutive of all human communities. Arguing against the traditional and still present primacy of the rationally based understanding of language, I wish to stress the possibility of another approach to language, strongly related to the question of the Other. Relying on the idea that the Other is a constitutive part of any linguistic situation, I wish to inspect how it is possible for the voice of the Other to be suppressed or silenced, and if that is the case, how we should understand the silence of the Other. The main result of my findings is that the silence of the Other is not only meaningful, but that it can have positive social and political effects, including the enhancement of the sensitivity for the various modalities of the voice of the Other., U ovom radu bavimo se povezanošću domena jezika i domena društvenih interakcija, koji konstituišu svaku ljudsku zajednicu. Na pozadini kritike tradicionalnog, pa i sada u mnogome prisutnog primata razumevanja jezika zasnovanog na razumu, nameravamo da istaknemo mogućnost drugačijeg pristupa jeziku, takvog koji je bitno povezan sa pitanjem Drugog. Osla-njajući se na ideju da je Drugi konstitutivni aspekt bilo koje jezičke situacije, želimo da ispi-tamo kako je moguće da glas drugog bude suspendovan ili ućutkan, i – ako je to slučaj – kako bi trebalo da razumemo tišinu Drugog. Ključni rezultat naših analiza je da tišina Drugog nije samo obremenjena značenjem, već da ona može imati pozitivne društvene i političke posle-dice, uključujući tu i unapređivanje senzitivnosti za različite modalitete glasa Drugog.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "The Silence of the Other: the Voice and the Sign, Tišina drugog: glas i znak",
number = "4",
volume = "31",
pages = "569-576",
doi = "10.2298/FID2004569P"
}
Popović, U. (2020). Tišina drugog: glas i znak.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and SocietyBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 31(4), 569-576.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2004569P
Popović U. Tišina drugog: glas i znak. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2020;31(4):569-576
Popović Una, "Tišina drugog: glas i znak" 31, no. 4 (2020):569-576,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2004569P .

In the Defence of Musical Meaning

Popović, Una

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Popović, Una
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID1901083P
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1953
AB  - This paper is about the musical meaning and its relation to verbal meaning. My aim is to show that musical meaning should be sharply differentiated from the verbal one, that it should not be understood as a subspecies of verbal meaning, or as a meaning of a verbal sort whatsoever. I will address this issue starting with the sounds of music and language, and working my way up from those: by comparing these sounds and the way they relate to their meanings, I will show that musical sounds are strongly connected with musical meanings, that they have token-like qualities. Resulting from this is a suggestion to redefine the way we use the concepts of meaning and articulation, so that they would allow for the concept of non-verbal, musical meaning. Additionally, my suggestion is that musical meaning per se should be differentiated from the non-musical meanings music can communicate and convey – one does not exclude the other.
AB  - Ovaj rad posvećen je muzičkom značenju i njegovom odnosu prema verbalnom značenju. Cilj nam je da pokažemo da muzičko značenje treba strogo razlikovati od verbalnog, da ga ne treba razumeti kao podvrstu verbalnog značenja, niti kao značenje verbalnog tipa u bilo kom smislu. Obradu ovog pitanja započećemo polazeći od zvukova muzike i jezika, a dalju argumentaciju izgradićemo na tom osnovu: poredeći ove zvukove i način na koji se oni odnose prema svojim značenjima, pokazaćemo da su muzički zvukovi bitno povezani sa muzičkim značenjima, da imaju svojstva poput tokena. Shodno tome, tvrdićemo da je potrebno redefinisati način na koji upotrebljavamo pojmove značenja i artikulacije, tako da oni mogu obuhvatiti i pojam neverbalnog, muzičkog značenja. Konačno, smatramo da bi muzička značenja kao takva trebalo razlikovati od nemuzičkih značenja koje muzika može da komunicira i prenese – jedno ne isključuje drugo.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - In the Defence of Musical Meaning
IS  - 1
VL  - 30
SP  - 83
EP  - 98
DO  - https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1901083P
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Popović, Una",
year = "2019",
url = "http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID1901083P, http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1953",
abstract = "This paper is about the musical meaning and its relation to verbal meaning. My aim is to show that musical meaning should be sharply differentiated from the verbal one, that it should not be understood as a subspecies of verbal meaning, or as a meaning of a verbal sort whatsoever. I will address this issue starting with the sounds of music and language, and working my way up from those: by comparing these sounds and the way they relate to their meanings, I will show that musical sounds are strongly connected with musical meanings, that they have token-like qualities. Resulting from this is a suggestion to redefine the way we use the concepts of meaning and articulation, so that they would allow for the concept of non-verbal, musical meaning. Additionally, my suggestion is that musical meaning per se should be differentiated from the non-musical meanings music can communicate and convey – one does not exclude the other., Ovaj rad posvećen je muzičkom značenju i njegovom odnosu prema verbalnom značenju. Cilj nam je da pokažemo da muzičko značenje treba strogo razlikovati od verbalnog, da ga ne treba razumeti kao podvrstu verbalnog značenja, niti kao značenje verbalnog tipa u bilo kom smislu. Obradu ovog pitanja započećemo polazeći od zvukova muzike i jezika, a dalju argumentaciju izgradićemo na tom osnovu: poredeći ove zvukove i način na koji se oni odnose prema svojim značenjima, pokazaćemo da su muzički zvukovi bitno povezani sa muzičkim značenjima, da imaju svojstva poput tokena. Shodno tome, tvrdićemo da je potrebno redefinisati način na koji upotrebljavamo pojmove značenja i artikulacije, tako da oni mogu obuhvatiti i pojam neverbalnog, muzičkog značenja. Konačno, smatramo da bi muzička značenja kao takva trebalo razlikovati od nemuzičkih značenja koje muzika može da komunicira i prenese – jedno ne isključuje drugo.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "In the Defence of Musical Meaning",
number = "1",
volume = "30",
pages = "83-98",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1901083P"
}
Popović, U. (2019). In the Defence of Musical Meaning.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and SocietyBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 30(1), 83-98.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1901083P
Popović U. In the Defence of Musical Meaning. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2019;30(1):83-98
Popović Una, "In the Defence of Musical Meaning" 30, no. 1 (2019):83-98,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1901083P .

Nebojša Grubor, Kant i zasnivanje moderne estetike: o osećaju prosuđivanja svrhovite forme lepog predmeta

Popović, Una

(2017)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Popović, Una
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1434
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Nebojša Grubor, Kant i zasnivanje moderne estetike: o osećaju prosuđivanja svrhovite forme lepog predmeta
IS  - 2
VL  - 28
SP  - 399
EP  - 401
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Popović, Una",
year = "2017",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1434",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Nebojša Grubor, Kant i zasnivanje moderne estetike: o osećaju prosuđivanja svrhovite forme lepog predmeta",
number = "2",
volume = "28",
pages = "399-401"
}
Popović, U. (2017). Nebojša Grubor, Kant i zasnivanje moderne estetike: o osećaju prosuđivanja svrhovite forme lepog predmeta.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 28(2), 399-401.
Popović U. Nebojša Grubor, Kant i zasnivanje moderne estetike: o osećaju prosuđivanja svrhovite forme lepog predmeta. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2017;28(2):399-401
Popović Una, "Nebojša Grubor, Kant i zasnivanje moderne estetike: o osećaju prosuđivanja svrhovite forme lepog predmeta" 28, no. 2 (2017):399-401

Problem estetskog suđenja: perspektive estetike

Jovanov, Rastko; Popović, Una

(2013)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Popović, Una
PY  - 2013
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/887
AB  - This paper deals with the interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Judgment from the perspective of aesthetics. Our aim here is to show the immanent relationship between the two main motifs of this work: the analysis of traditional aesthetic problems, such as beauty and taste, on the one hand, and the systematical thinking, philosophy, and Kant’s critical project, on the other. This interpretation is developed in consideration of the problem of aesthetics as a philosophical discipline, within which, for each of the motifs of Kant’s third critique it is shown how it redefines aesthetic into philosophical thought. Finally, the character of critical positioning of aesthetic problems in Kant is shown in light of the opening of the perspective of subjective universality as a theme that connects the two motifs of third critique, but also allows a different view in the domain of intersubjectivity.
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Problem estetskog suđenja: perspektive estetike
T1  - The Problem of Aesthetic Judgment : Perspectives of Aesthetics
SP  - 5
EP  - 22
DO  - 10.2298/FID1303005P
ER  - 
@article{
editor = "Jovanov, Rastko",
author = "Popović, Una",
year = "2013",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/887",
abstract = "This paper deals with the interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Judgment from the perspective of aesthetics. Our aim here is to show the immanent relationship between the two main motifs of this work: the analysis of traditional aesthetic problems, such as beauty and taste, on the one hand, and the systematical thinking, philosophy, and Kant’s critical project, on the other. This interpretation is developed in consideration of the problem of aesthetics as a philosophical discipline, within which, for each of the motifs of Kant’s third critique it is shown how it redefines aesthetic into philosophical thought. Finally, the character of critical positioning of aesthetic problems in Kant is shown in light of the opening of the perspective of subjective universality as a theme that connects the two motifs of third critique, but also allows a different view in the domain of intersubjectivity.",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Problem estetskog suđenja: perspektive estetike, The Problem of Aesthetic Judgment : Perspectives of Aesthetics",
pages = "5-22",
doi = "10.2298/FID1303005P"
}
Jovanov, R.,& Popović, U. (2013). The Problem of Aesthetic Judgment : Perspectives of Aesthetics.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 5-22.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1303005P
Jovanov R, Popović U. The Problem of Aesthetic Judgment : Perspectives of Aesthetics. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2013;:5-22
Jovanov Rastko, Popović Una, "The Problem of Aesthetic Judgment : Perspectives of Aesthetics" (2013):5-22,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1303005P .

Razumeti filozofsku životinju

Popović, Una

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2010)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Popović, Una
PY  - 2010
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/483
AB  - In this paper, inspired by the Predrag Krstic’s book Philosophical Animal, author is trying to find hers way through a broad and complex web of philosophies and roles that different animals play in them. The main question is how to understand philosophy itself in a present day context, which philosophy is supposed to think and rethink through. Animals as presented in concepts, more precisely philosophical contexts, open one interesting and innovative way to deal with this question, balancing between tradition of philosophy and its presence, structure of philosophical arguments and questioning of language of philosophy, abstract and individual. In this frame philosopher as the true philosophical animal is revealed as the main symbol that requires analysis in his philosophical strategies.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Razumeti filozofsku životinju
T1  - Understading philosophical animal
SP  - 113
EP  - 122
DO  - 10.2298/FID1001113P
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Popović, Una",
year = "2010",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/483",
abstract = "In this paper, inspired by the Predrag Krstic’s book Philosophical Animal, author is trying to find hers way through a broad and complex web of philosophies and roles that different animals play in them. The main question is how to understand philosophy itself in a present day context, which philosophy is supposed to think and rethink through. Animals as presented in concepts, more precisely philosophical contexts, open one interesting and innovative way to deal with this question, balancing between tradition of philosophy and its presence, structure of philosophical arguments and questioning of language of philosophy, abstract and individual. In this frame philosopher as the true philosophical animal is revealed as the main symbol that requires analysis in his philosophical strategies.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Razumeti filozofsku životinju, Understading philosophical animal",
pages = "113-122",
doi = "10.2298/FID1001113P"
}
Popović, U. (2010). Understading philosophical animal.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and SocietyBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 113-122.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1001113P
Popović U. Understading philosophical animal. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2010;:113-122
Popović Una, "Understading philosophical animal" (2010):113-122,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1001113P .