TY  - JOUR
AU  - Janović, Nikola
PY  - 2009
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/40
AB  - The general idea of this text is to reflect biopolitical constitution of the society
and its implications related to the issues of animal welfare. Since animal in
biopolitical formation is technically reduced to an object – commodity for contentment
of the industry and of the people needs – critical public advisories are calling
from moral, ethical and legal standpoint for attention to the fact that is necessary to
protect animals from the unnecessary exploitation. It is obvious that animal protection
is evoking animal rights question. But in the last instance protection of animal
rights is related to the nutritional dilemma of animal food use. Question is arising:
does animal rights in particular also envisage change in food politics (abandonment
of meat food use), what is for instance the extreme veg(etari)an option taking for
granted? This challenge sent to the culture of all-food eaters is opening up new questions
and dilemmas. First of all, there is a question linked to the right of men to
choose his own nutritional option, and of course dilemma which is related to scruples
about meat-eaters and their (non)ability to love animals.
PB  - Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
T1  - Biopolitika: Životinje, meso, hrana
T1  - Biopolitics. Animals. Meat. Food
SP  - 41
EP  - 58
DO  - 10.2298/FID0902041J
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Janović, Nikola",
year = "2009",
abstract = "The general idea of this text is to reflect biopolitical constitution of the society
and its implications related to the issues of animal welfare. Since animal in
biopolitical formation is technically reduced to an object – commodity for contentment
of the industry and of the people needs – critical public advisories are calling
from moral, ethical and legal standpoint for attention to the fact that is necessary to
protect animals from the unnecessary exploitation. It is obvious that animal protection
is evoking animal rights question. But in the last instance protection of animal
rights is related to the nutritional dilemma of animal food use. Question is arising:
does animal rights in particular also envisage change in food politics (abandonment
of meat food use), what is for instance the extreme veg(etari)an option taking for
granted? This challenge sent to the culture of all-food eaters is opening up new questions
and dilemmas. First of all, there is a question linked to the right of men to
choose his own nutritional option, and of course dilemma which is related to scruples
about meat-eaters and their (non)ability to love animals.",
publisher = "Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society",
title = "Biopolitika: Životinje, meso, hrana, Biopolitics. Animals. Meat. Food",
pages = "41-58",
doi = "10.2298/FID0902041J"
}

Janović, N.. (2009). Biopolitika: Životinje, meso, hrana. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society
Beograd: Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 41-58.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0902041J

Janović N. Biopolitika: Životinje, meso, hrana. in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society. 2009;:41-58.
doi:10.2298/FID0902041J .

Janović, Nikola, "Biopolitika: Životinje, meso, hrana" in Filozofija i društvo / Philosophy and Society (2009):41-58,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0902041J . .