Losoncz, Mark

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
cf398279-3d58-4da1-9f27-1fcc97641ae0
  • Losoncz, Mark (14)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

A történelmi szingularitás és a holokauszt

Losoncz, Mark

(Novi Sad: Forum - izdavačka delatnost, 2021)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Losoncz, Mark
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2340
PB  - Novi Sad: Forum - izdavačka delatnost
T2  - Híd
T1  - A történelmi szingularitás és a holokauszt
IS  - 05/06
SP  - 110
EP  - 134
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Losoncz, Mark",
year = "2021",
publisher = "Novi Sad: Forum - izdavačka delatnost",
journal = "Híd",
title = "A történelmi szingularitás és a holokauszt",
number = "05/06",
pages = "110-134"
}
Losoncz, M.. (2021). A történelmi szingularitás és a holokauszt. in Híd
Novi Sad: Forum - izdavačka delatnost.(05/06), 110-134.
Losoncz M. A történelmi szingularitás és a holokauszt. in Híd. 2021;(05/06):110-134..
Losoncz, Mark, "A történelmi szingularitás és a holokauszt" in Híd, no. 05/06 (2021):110-134.

Előszó

Losoncz, Mark; Tóth, Szilárd János

(Budapest: L’Harmattan, 2021)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Losoncz, Mark
AU  - Tóth, Szilárd János
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2338
PB  - Budapest: L’Harmattan
T2  - Kortárs republikanizmus
T1  - Előszó
T1  - Bevezetés
SP  - 7
EP  - 25
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Losoncz, Mark and Tóth, Szilárd János",
year = "2021",
publisher = "Budapest: L’Harmattan",
journal = "Kortárs republikanizmus",
booktitle = "Előszó, Bevezetés",
pages = "7-25"
}
Losoncz, M.,& Tóth, S. J.. (2021). Előszó. in Kortárs republikanizmus
Budapest: L’Harmattan., 7-25.
Losoncz M, Tóth SJ. Előszó. in Kortárs republikanizmus. 2021;:7-25..
Losoncz, Mark, Tóth, Szilárd János, "Előszó" in Kortárs republikanizmus (2021):7-25.

Elköteleződni a titok ellen/mellett

Losoncz, Mark

(Budapest: L’Harmattan, 2021)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Losoncz, Mark
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2336
PB  - Budapest: L’Harmattan
T2  - Kortárs republikanizmus
T1  - Elköteleződni a titok ellen/mellett
SP  - 148
EP  - 157
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Losoncz, Mark",
year = "2021",
publisher = "Budapest: L’Harmattan",
journal = "Kortárs republikanizmus",
booktitle = "Elköteleződni a titok ellen/mellett",
pages = "148-157"
}
Losoncz, M.. (2021). Elköteleződni a titok ellen/mellett. in Kortárs republikanizmus
Budapest: L’Harmattan., 148-157.
Losoncz M. Elköteleződni a titok ellen/mellett. in Kortárs republikanizmus. 2021;:148-157..
Losoncz, Mark, "Elköteleződni a titok ellen/mellett" in Kortárs republikanizmus (2021):148-157.

Self-Government in Yugoslavia: The Path to Capitalism?

Losoncz, Mark; Ivanišević, Andrea; Losoncz, Alpar

(London: Intechopen, 2021)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Losoncz, Mark
AU  - Ivanišević, Andrea
AU  - Losoncz, Alpar
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2334
AB  - This chapter analyzes self-governing Yugoslavia in the context of capitalism. Regarding the problem of capitalism in socialist world, the practice of the former Yugoslavia cannot be ignored. The socialist Yugoslavia was predetermined to be qualified as capitalist. The Yugoslav leadership developed: (a) self-government, (b) elements of market-biased socialism, and (c) openness to the international economy or the integration in the world market. Its economy achieved remarkable results by the mid-1960s. Some notable economists compliment the results and suggest that the model is sustainable. However, since the mid-1960s, regressive tendencies have emerged that perpetuate significant social dissatisfaction. In 1968, students protested against the state of Yugoslav socialism, believing that it had absorbed capitalism. Others felt that Yugoslav socialism had not sufficiently developed market-based socialism. There were authors that argued that Yugoslav socialism had become capitalist but without capitalist rationality. In the 1970s, the de iure existing federation became a de facto confederation with closed national economies. The chapter discusses the presence of elements of capitalism in this form of socialism based on (a) dependence on the world market, (b) banks as the institutionalization of “financial mode of capital,” and (c) the existence of perpetuated unemployment.
PB  - London: Intechopen
T2  - Emerging Markets
T1  - Self-Government in Yugoslavia: The Path to Capitalism?
SP  - 193
EP  - 209
DO  - 10.5772/intechopen.93673
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Losoncz, Mark and Ivanišević, Andrea and Losoncz, Alpar",
year = "2021",
abstract = "This chapter analyzes self-governing Yugoslavia in the context of capitalism. Regarding the problem of capitalism in socialist world, the practice of the former Yugoslavia cannot be ignored. The socialist Yugoslavia was predetermined to be qualified as capitalist. The Yugoslav leadership developed: (a) self-government, (b) elements of market-biased socialism, and (c) openness to the international economy or the integration in the world market. Its economy achieved remarkable results by the mid-1960s. Some notable economists compliment the results and suggest that the model is sustainable. However, since the mid-1960s, regressive tendencies have emerged that perpetuate significant social dissatisfaction. In 1968, students protested against the state of Yugoslav socialism, believing that it had absorbed capitalism. Others felt that Yugoslav socialism had not sufficiently developed market-based socialism. There were authors that argued that Yugoslav socialism had become capitalist but without capitalist rationality. In the 1970s, the de iure existing federation became a de facto confederation with closed national economies. The chapter discusses the presence of elements of capitalism in this form of socialism based on (a) dependence on the world market, (b) banks as the institutionalization of “financial mode of capital,” and (c) the existence of perpetuated unemployment.",
publisher = "London: Intechopen",
journal = "Emerging Markets",
booktitle = "Self-Government in Yugoslavia: The Path to Capitalism?",
pages = "193-209",
doi = "10.5772/intechopen.93673"
}
Losoncz, M., Ivanišević, A.,& Losoncz, A.. (2021). Self-Government in Yugoslavia: The Path to Capitalism?. in Emerging Markets
London: Intechopen., 193-209.
https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93673
Losoncz M, Ivanišević A, Losoncz A. Self-Government in Yugoslavia: The Path to Capitalism?. in Emerging Markets. 2021;:193-209.
doi:10.5772/intechopen.93673 .
Losoncz, Mark, Ivanišević, Andrea, Losoncz, Alpar, "Self-Government in Yugoslavia: The Path to Capitalism?" in Emerging Markets (2021):193-209,
https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93673 . .

A Critical Account of the Concept of De-Objectified Hatred

Losoncz, Mark

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2021)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Losoncz, Mark
PY  - 2021
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2273
AB  - This paper looks at Thomas Szanto’s theory of hatred that suggests that hatred has an indeterminate affective focus and that it derives its intensity from the commitment to the attitude itself. Contrary to Szanto’s theses, this paper claims that the hated properties are not necessarily fuzzy. On the contrary, in many cases we can clearly reconstruct the quasi-rational genesis of hatred, by relying on the deep structures behind the social dynamics (as demonstrated by the example of anti-Semitism). Furthermore, the paper states that even though in certain cases hatred is a truly empty of content, these cases are marginal in comparison to other, more important forms of hatred.
AB  - Članak se fokusira na teoriju mržnje kod Tomasa Santa koja sugeriuše da mržnja nema jasan 
afektivni fokus, te da njen intentizet proističe iz zalaganja za sam intencionalni stav mržnje. 
Za razliku od Santove teze, članak trvrdi da omražena svojstva nisu nužno nejasna. Naprotiv, 
u mnogim slučajevim se precizno može rekonstruisati kvazi-racionalna geneza mržnje, oslanjajući se na duboke strukture iza društvene dinamike (kao što pokazuje primer antisemitizma). Nadalje, članak konstatuje da iako je istina da je u izvesnim slučjavima mržnja bez sadržaja, ovi slučajevi su marginalni u odnosu na druge, značajnije forme mržnje
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - A Critical Account of the Concept of De-Objectified Hatred
T1  - Kritički osvrt na koncept deobjektifikovane mržnje
IS  - 3
VL  - 32
SP  - 369
EP  - 376
DO  - 10.2298/FID2103369L
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Losoncz, Mark",
year = "2021",
abstract = "This paper looks at Thomas Szanto’s theory of hatred that suggests that hatred has an indeterminate affective focus and that it derives its intensity from the commitment to the attitude itself. Contrary to Szanto’s theses, this paper claims that the hated properties are not necessarily fuzzy. On the contrary, in many cases we can clearly reconstruct the quasi-rational genesis of hatred, by relying on the deep structures behind the social dynamics (as demonstrated by the example of anti-Semitism). Furthermore, the paper states that even though in certain cases hatred is a truly empty of content, these cases are marginal in comparison to other, more important forms of hatred., Članak se fokusira na teoriju mržnje kod Tomasa Santa koja sugeriuše da mržnja nema jasan 
afektivni fokus, te da njen intentizet proističe iz zalaganja za sam intencionalni stav mržnje. 
Za razliku od Santove teze, članak trvrdi da omražena svojstva nisu nužno nejasna. Naprotiv, 
u mnogim slučajevim se precizno može rekonstruisati kvazi-racionalna geneza mržnje, oslanjajući se na duboke strukture iza društvene dinamike (kao što pokazuje primer antisemitizma). Nadalje, članak konstatuje da iako je istina da je u izvesnim slučjavima mržnja bez sadržaja, ovi slučajevi su marginalni u odnosu na druge, značajnije forme mržnje",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "A Critical Account of the Concept of De-Objectified Hatred, Kritički osvrt na koncept deobjektifikovane mržnje",
number = "3",
volume = "32",
pages = "369-376",
doi = "10.2298/FID2103369L"
}
Losoncz, M.. (2021). A Critical Account of the Concept of De-Objectified Hatred. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 32(3), 369-376.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2103369L
Losoncz M. A Critical Account of the Concept of De-Objectified Hatred. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2021;32(3):369-376.
doi:10.2298/FID2103369L .
Losoncz, Mark, "A Critical Account of the Concept of De-Objectified Hatred" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 32, no. 3 (2021):369-376,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2103369L . .

Pojam želje u Levinasovoj filozofiji

Losoncz, Mark

(Beograd: Srpsko filozofsko društvo, 2020)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Losoncz, Mark
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2332
AB  - Članak se bavi pojmom želje u Levinasovoj filozofiji, sa posebnim osvrtom na pitanje njenog metafizičkog karaktera. Oslanjajući se i na rane radove Levinasa, autor pokušava da dekonstruiše pojam želje ukazujući na njegov protivrečni odnos prema konceptu potreba. Posebna pažnja je posvećena nekim drugim fenomenološkim interpretacijama (Huserl, Hajdeger, Sartr, Mišel Anri) i dijalektičkom shvatanju želje (Hegel), a to omogućava da se zahvati specifičnost Levinasove perspektive. Na kraju članka autor se bavi mogućnošću etike koja bi polazila od responzivne želje, u okviru fenomenologije alteriteta.
AB  - This paper deals with the notion of desire in Lévinas’ philosophy, with special
attention to the question of its metaphysical character. By relying upon the early works
of Lévinas as well, the author deconstructs the notion of desire by pointing at its contradictory relationship to the concept of needs. Attention is devoted to certain phenomenological interpretations (Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, Michel Henry) and to the
dialectical understanding of desire (Hegel) that enables us to seize the specificity of
Lévinas’ viewpoint. At the end of the paper the author discusses the possibility of an
ethics of responsive desire within the phenomenology of alterity.
PB  - Beograd: Srpsko filozofsko društvo
T2  - Theoria
T1  - Pojam želje u Levinasovoj filozofiji
T1  - The Notion of Desire in Lévinas’ Philosophy
VL  - 63
SP  - 43
EP  - 55
DO  - 10.2298/THEO2001043L
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Losoncz, Mark",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Članak se bavi pojmom želje u Levinasovoj filozofiji, sa posebnim osvrtom na pitanje njenog metafizičkog karaktera. Oslanjajući se i na rane radove Levinasa, autor pokušava da dekonstruiše pojam želje ukazujući na njegov protivrečni odnos prema konceptu potreba. Posebna pažnja je posvećena nekim drugim fenomenološkim interpretacijama (Huserl, Hajdeger, Sartr, Mišel Anri) i dijalektičkom shvatanju želje (Hegel), a to omogućava da se zahvati specifičnost Levinasove perspektive. Na kraju članka autor se bavi mogućnošću etike koja bi polazila od responzivne želje, u okviru fenomenologije alteriteta., This paper deals with the notion of desire in Lévinas’ philosophy, with special
attention to the question of its metaphysical character. By relying upon the early works
of Lévinas as well, the author deconstructs the notion of desire by pointing at its contradictory relationship to the concept of needs. Attention is devoted to certain phenomenological interpretations (Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, Michel Henry) and to the
dialectical understanding of desire (Hegel) that enables us to seize the specificity of
Lévinas’ viewpoint. At the end of the paper the author discusses the possibility of an
ethics of responsive desire within the phenomenology of alterity.",
publisher = "Beograd: Srpsko filozofsko društvo",
journal = "Theoria",
title = "Pojam želje u Levinasovoj filozofiji, The Notion of Desire in Lévinas’ Philosophy",
volume = "63",
pages = "43-55",
doi = "10.2298/THEO2001043L"
}
Losoncz, M.. (2020). Pojam želje u Levinasovoj filozofiji. in Theoria
Beograd: Srpsko filozofsko društvo., 63, 43-55.
https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO2001043L
Losoncz M. Pojam želje u Levinasovoj filozofiji. in Theoria. 2020;63:43-55.
doi:10.2298/THEO2001043L .
Losoncz, Mark, "Pojam želje u Levinasovoj filozofiji" in Theoria, 63 (2020):43-55,
https://doi.org/10.2298/THEO2001043L . .

Praxis, reflexió, társadalmi változás – az olvasó elkötelezése

Losoncz, Mark; Vasiljević, Jelena; Zaharijević, Adriana

(Novi Sad : Forum; Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2020)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Losoncz, Mark
AU  - Vasiljević, Jelena
AU  - Zaharijević, Adriana
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2205
PB  - Novi Sad : Forum; Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Elköteleződés és kritika Tanulmányok az angazsáltságról
T1  - Praxis, reflexió, társadalmi változás – az olvasó elkötelezése
SP  - 5
EP  - 10
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Losoncz, Mark and Vasiljević, Jelena and Zaharijević, Adriana",
year = "2020",
publisher = "Novi Sad : Forum; Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Elköteleződés és kritika Tanulmányok az angazsáltságról",
booktitle = "Praxis, reflexió, társadalmi változás – az olvasó elkötelezése",
pages = "5-10"
}
Losoncz, M., Vasiljević, J.,& Zaharijević, A.. (2020). Praxis, reflexió, társadalmi változás – az olvasó elkötelezése. in Elköteleződés és kritika Tanulmányok az angazsáltságról
Novi Sad : Forum; Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 5-10.
Losoncz M, Vasiljević J, Zaharijević A. Praxis, reflexió, társadalmi változás – az olvasó elkötelezése. in Elköteleződés és kritika Tanulmányok az angazsáltságról. 2020;:5-10..
Losoncz, Mark, Vasiljević, Jelena, Zaharijević, Adriana, "Praxis, reflexió, társadalmi változás – az olvasó elkötelezése" in Elköteleződés és kritika Tanulmányok az angazsáltságról (2020):5-10.

Pojam pažnje u Bergsonovoj i Husserlovoj filozofiji

Losoncz, Mark

(Zagreb: Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo, 2020)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Losoncz, Mark
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2254
AB  - Članak se na komparativan način bavi pojmom pažnje u Bergsonovoj i Husserlovoj filozofiji. Posebna pažnja posvećena je njihovoj konfrontaciji sa psihološkim tumačenjima pa­
žnje, kao i metodološkim aspektima njihovih teorija. Analizira se vitalnost, intencionalnost
i temporalnost pažnje, imajući u vidu složenu terminološku pozadinu i kod Bergson i kod
Husserla. Autor smatra da ih povezuje to što pažnju određuju kao dinamičnu unutrašnju
modifikaciju, s različitim dimenzijama sadašnjosti, prošlosti i budućnosti. Istovremeno su
uzete u obzir sličnosti i razlike u pogledu najvažnijih dilema.
PB  - Zagreb: Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo
T2  - Filozofska istraživanja
T1  - Pojam pažnje u Bergsonovoj i Husserlovoj filozofiji
IS  - 4
VL  - 40
SP  - 829
EP  - 839
DO  - 10.21464/fi40410
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Losoncz, Mark",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Članak se na komparativan način bavi pojmom pažnje u Bergsonovoj i Husserlovoj filozofiji. Posebna pažnja posvećena je njihovoj konfrontaciji sa psihološkim tumačenjima pa­
žnje, kao i metodološkim aspektima njihovih teorija. Analizira se vitalnost, intencionalnost
i temporalnost pažnje, imajući u vidu složenu terminološku pozadinu i kod Bergson i kod
Husserla. Autor smatra da ih povezuje to što pažnju određuju kao dinamičnu unutrašnju
modifikaciju, s različitim dimenzijama sadašnjosti, prošlosti i budućnosti. Istovremeno su
uzete u obzir sličnosti i razlike u pogledu najvažnijih dilema.",
publisher = "Zagreb: Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo",
journal = "Filozofska istraživanja",
title = "Pojam pažnje u Bergsonovoj i Husserlovoj filozofiji",
number = "4",
volume = "40",
pages = "829-839",
doi = "10.21464/fi40410"
}
Losoncz, M.. (2020). Pojam pažnje u Bergsonovoj i Husserlovoj filozofiji. in Filozofska istraživanja
Zagreb: Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo., 40(4), 829-839.
https://doi.org/10.21464/fi40410
Losoncz M. Pojam pažnje u Bergsonovoj i Husserlovoj filozofiji. in Filozofska istraživanja. 2020;40(4):829-839.
doi:10.21464/fi40410 .
Losoncz, Mark, "Pojam pažnje u Bergsonovoj i Husserlovoj filozofiji" in Filozofska istraživanja, 40, no. 4 (2020):829-839,
https://doi.org/10.21464/fi40410 . .

Vanredno stanje na granicama prava : prevrednovanje jednog kritičkog koncepta

Losoncz, Mark; Losoncz, Alpar

(Novi Sad : Advokatska komora Vojvodine, 2020)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Losoncz, Mark
AU  - Losoncz, Alpar
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2201
AB  - Članak se fokusira na pojam vanrednog stanja, uzimajući u obzir njegova pravna i politička značenja. Raspravljajući s
Agambenovom analizom vanrednog stanja, članak nudi alternativno
objašnjenje geneze vanrednog stanja, sa posebnim osvrtom na ulogu
liberalizma, nuklearnog rata i izvora vanrednog stanja koje je bilo
uvedeno u SAD nakon terorističkih napada 11. septembra. U članku
se naglašava da vanredno stanje ne treba opisati kao „anomično
stanje” koje suspenduje pravo, već je reč o mnogo kompleksnijim
odnosima u kojima se ono pravno i nepravno „organski” prepliću.
Članak se završava analizom neoliberalnog odnosa prema vanrednom stanju.
PB  - Novi Sad : Advokatska komora Vojvodine
T2  - Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine - filozofija prava
T1  - Vanredno stanje na granicama prava : prevrednovanje jednog kritičkog koncepta
IS  - 4
VL  - 92
DO  - 10.5937/gakv92-29229
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Losoncz, Mark and Losoncz, Alpar",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Članak se fokusira na pojam vanrednog stanja, uzimajući u obzir njegova pravna i politička značenja. Raspravljajući s
Agambenovom analizom vanrednog stanja, članak nudi alternativno
objašnjenje geneze vanrednog stanja, sa posebnim osvrtom na ulogu
liberalizma, nuklearnog rata i izvora vanrednog stanja koje je bilo
uvedeno u SAD nakon terorističkih napada 11. septembra. U članku
se naglašava da vanredno stanje ne treba opisati kao „anomično
stanje” koje suspenduje pravo, već je reč o mnogo kompleksnijim
odnosima u kojima se ono pravno i nepravno „organski” prepliću.
Članak se završava analizom neoliberalnog odnosa prema vanrednom stanju.",
publisher = "Novi Sad : Advokatska komora Vojvodine",
journal = "Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine - filozofija prava",
title = "Vanredno stanje na granicama prava : prevrednovanje jednog kritičkog koncepta",
number = "4",
volume = "92",
doi = "10.5937/gakv92-29229"
}
Losoncz, M.,& Losoncz, A.. (2020). Vanredno stanje na granicama prava : prevrednovanje jednog kritičkog koncepta. in Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine - filozofija prava
Novi Sad : Advokatska komora Vojvodine., 92(4).
https://doi.org/10.5937/gakv92-29229
Losoncz M, Losoncz A. Vanredno stanje na granicama prava : prevrednovanje jednog kritičkog koncepta. in Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine - filozofija prava. 2020;92(4).
doi:10.5937/gakv92-29229 .
Losoncz, Mark, Losoncz, Alpar, "Vanredno stanje na granicama prava : prevrednovanje jednog kritičkog koncepta" in Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine - filozofija prava, 92, no. 4 (2020),
https://doi.org/10.5937/gakv92-29229 . .

No-self – avagy identitás nélkül?

Losoncz, Mark

(Szeged : Pro Philosophia Szegediensi Alapítvány – Magyar Filozófiai Társaság – Státus Kiadó, 2020)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Losoncz, Mark
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2207
PB  - Szeged : Pro Philosophia Szegediensi Alapítvány – Magyar Filozófiai Társaság – Státus Kiadó
T2  - Az identitás. Lábjegyzetek Platónhoz 18
T1  - No-self – avagy identitás nélkül?
SP  - 190
EP  - 198
ER  - 
@inbook{
author = "Losoncz, Mark",
year = "2020",
publisher = "Szeged : Pro Philosophia Szegediensi Alapítvány – Magyar Filozófiai Társaság – Státus Kiadó",
journal = "Az identitás. Lábjegyzetek Platónhoz 18",
booktitle = "No-self – avagy identitás nélkül?",
pages = "190-198"
}
Losoncz, M.. (2020). No-self – avagy identitás nélkül?. in Az identitás. Lábjegyzetek Platónhoz 18
Szeged : Pro Philosophia Szegediensi Alapítvány – Magyar Filozófiai Társaság – Státus Kiadó., 190-198.
Losoncz M. No-self – avagy identitás nélkül?. in Az identitás. Lábjegyzetek Platónhoz 18. 2020;:190-198..
Losoncz, Mark, "No-self – avagy identitás nélkül?" in Az identitás. Lábjegyzetek Platónhoz 18 (2020):190-198.

Pojam pažnje u Bergsonovoj i Husserlovoj filozofiji

Losoncz, Mark

(Zagreb : Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo, 2020)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Losoncz, Mark
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2203
AB  - Članak se na komparativan način bavi pojmom pažnje u Bergsonovoj i Husserlovoj filozofiji. Posebna pažnja posvećena je njihovoj konfrontaciji sa psihološkim tumačenjima pažnje, kao i metodološkim aspektima njihovih teorija. Analizira se vitalnost, intencionalnost
i temporalnost pažnje, imajući u vidu složenu terminološku pozadinu i kod Bergson i kod
Husserla. Autor smatra da ih povezuje to što pažnju određuju kao dinamičnu unutrašnju
modifikaciju, s različitim dimenzijama sadašnjosti, prošlosti i budućnosti. Istovremeno su
uzete u obzir sličnosti i razlike u pogledu najvažnijih dilema.
AB  - The paper comparatively deals with the concept of attention in Bergson’s and Husserl’s philosophy. Special attention is devoted to their confrontation with psychological interpretations,
as well as to methodological aspects of their theories. Analysed are the vitality, intentionality
and temporality of attention by keeping in mind the complex terminological background in
both Bergson and Husserl. The author holds that what connects them is that they both define
attention as an inherent dynamic modification, with the different dimensions of presence, past
and future. Similarities and differences are both taken into consideration concerning the most
important dilemmas.
PB  - Zagreb : Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo
T2  - Filozofska istraživanja
T1  - Pojam pažnje u Bergsonovoj i Husserlovoj filozofiji
T1  - Concept of Attention in Bergson’s and Husserl’s Philosophy
IS  - 4
VL  - 40
SP  - 829
EP  - 839
DO  - 10.21464/fi40410
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Losoncz, Mark",
year = "2020",
abstract = "Članak se na komparativan način bavi pojmom pažnje u Bergsonovoj i Husserlovoj filozofiji. Posebna pažnja posvećena je njihovoj konfrontaciji sa psihološkim tumačenjima pažnje, kao i metodološkim aspektima njihovih teorija. Analizira se vitalnost, intencionalnost
i temporalnost pažnje, imajući u vidu složenu terminološku pozadinu i kod Bergson i kod
Husserla. Autor smatra da ih povezuje to što pažnju određuju kao dinamičnu unutrašnju
modifikaciju, s različitim dimenzijama sadašnjosti, prošlosti i budućnosti. Istovremeno su
uzete u obzir sličnosti i razlike u pogledu najvažnijih dilema., The paper comparatively deals with the concept of attention in Bergson’s and Husserl’s philosophy. Special attention is devoted to their confrontation with psychological interpretations,
as well as to methodological aspects of their theories. Analysed are the vitality, intentionality
and temporality of attention by keeping in mind the complex terminological background in
both Bergson and Husserl. The author holds that what connects them is that they both define
attention as an inherent dynamic modification, with the different dimensions of presence, past
and future. Similarities and differences are both taken into consideration concerning the most
important dilemmas.",
publisher = "Zagreb : Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo",
journal = "Filozofska istraživanja",
title = "Pojam pažnje u Bergsonovoj i Husserlovoj filozofiji, Concept of Attention in Bergson’s and Husserl’s Philosophy",
number = "4",
volume = "40",
pages = "829-839",
doi = "10.21464/fi40410"
}
Losoncz, M.. (2020). Pojam pažnje u Bergsonovoj i Husserlovoj filozofiji. in Filozofska istraživanja
Zagreb : Hrvatsko filozofsko društvo., 40(4), 829-839.
https://doi.org/10.21464/fi40410
Losoncz M. Pojam pažnje u Bergsonovoj i Husserlovoj filozofiji. in Filozofska istraživanja. 2020;40(4):829-839.
doi:10.21464/fi40410 .
Losoncz, Mark, "Pojam pažnje u Bergsonovoj i Husserlovoj filozofiji" in Filozofska istraživanja, 40, no. 4 (2020):829-839,
https://doi.org/10.21464/fi40410 . .

The Aristotelian Arche-Decisions and the Challenge of Perishing

Losoncz, Mark

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2020)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Losoncz, Mark
PY  - 2020
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID2002194L
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2082
AB  - The paper deals with Aristotle’s concept of corruption. First, it reconstructs Aristotle’s debate with the pre-Socratics and then it focuses on the candidates for entity that can perish: form, matter, and substance. The text argues against the widely accepted thesis according to which substance is a corruptio simpliciter without further ado. The paper intensely relies upon ancient and medieval commentators of Aristotle. Finally, special attention is devoted to the dimension of time and the problem of actuality.
AB  - Ovaj rad tematizuje Aristotelov pojam nestajanja. Prvo, rekonstruiše Aristotelovu raspravu da predsokratcima, zatim se fokusira na pojedine kandidate za entitete koji mogu da nestanu: formu, materiju i supstanciju. Tekst pruža argumente protiv široko prihaćene teze da je supstancija corruptio simpliciter bez ikakvih rezervi. Rad se o velikoj meri oslanja i na antičke i srednjovekovne komentatore Aristotela. Na kraju, uzima se u obzir i dimenzija vremena, odnosno aktualnosti.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - The Aristotelian Arche-Decisions and the Challenge of Perishing
T1  - Aristotelove praodluke i izazov nestajanja
IS  - 2
VL  - 31
SP  - 194
EP  - 219
DO  - https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2002194L
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Losoncz, Mark",
year = "2020",
abstract = "The paper deals with Aristotle’s concept of corruption. First, it reconstructs Aristotle’s debate with the pre-Socratics and then it focuses on the candidates for entity that can perish: form, matter, and substance. The text argues against the widely accepted thesis according to which substance is a corruptio simpliciter without further ado. The paper intensely relies upon ancient and medieval commentators of Aristotle. Finally, special attention is devoted to the dimension of time and the problem of actuality., Ovaj rad tematizuje Aristotelov pojam nestajanja. Prvo, rekonstruiše Aristotelovu raspravu da predsokratcima, zatim se fokusira na pojedine kandidate za entitete koji mogu da nestanu: formu, materiju i supstanciju. Tekst pruža argumente protiv široko prihaćene teze da je supstancija corruptio simpliciter bez ikakvih rezervi. Rad se o velikoj meri oslanja i na antičke i srednjovekovne komentatore Aristotela. Na kraju, uzima se u obzir i dimenzija vremena, odnosno aktualnosti.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "The Aristotelian Arche-Decisions and the Challenge of Perishing, Aristotelove praodluke i izazov nestajanja",
number = "2",
volume = "31",
pages = "194-219",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2002194L"
}
Losoncz, M.. (2020). The Aristotelian Arche-Decisions and the Challenge of Perishing. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 31(2), 194-219.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2002194L
Losoncz M. The Aristotelian Arche-Decisions and the Challenge of Perishing. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2020;31(2):194-219.
doi:https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2002194L .
Losoncz, Mark, "The Aristotelian Arche-Decisions and the Challenge of Perishing" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 31, no. 2 (2020):194-219,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/FID2002194L . .

Belgrade 1968 Protests and the Post-Evental Fidelity: Intellectual and Political Legacy of the 1968 Student Protests in Serbia

Pavlović, Aleksandar; Losoncz, Mark

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Pavlović, Aleksandar
AU  - Losoncz, Mark
PY  - 2019
UR  - http://journal.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/index.php?journal=fid&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2298%2FFID1901149P
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1957
AB  - Even though Belgrade student protests emerged and ended abruptly after only seven days in June of 1968, they came as a cumulative point of a decade-long accumulated social dissatisfaction and antagonisms, as well as of philosophical investigations of the unorthodox Marxists of the Praxis school (Praksisovci). It surprised the Yugoslav authorities as the first massive rebellion after WWII to explicitly criticize rising social inequality, bureaucratization and unemployment and demand free speech and abolishment of privileges. This article focuses on the intellectual destiny and legacy of the eight professors from the Faculty of Philosophy close to the Praxis school, who were identified as the protests’ instigators and subsequently expelled from the University of Belgrade due to their “ethico-political unsuitability”. Under both international and domestic pressure, they were later reemployed in a separate research unit named the Centre for Philosophy and Social Theory, where they kept their critical edge and argued for political pluralism. From the late 1980s onwards, they and their colleagues became politically active and at times occupied the highest positions in Serbia – Dragoljub Mićunović as one of the founders of the modern Democratic Party and the Speaker of the Parliament, former Serbian President and Prime Minister Vojislav Koštunica and former Prime Minister late Zoran Đinđić. Still, while some members became strong anti-nationalists and anti-war activists, other embraced Serbian nationalism, therefore pivoting the intellectual split into the so called First and Second Serbia that marked Serbian society during the 1990s and remained influential to this day.
AB  - Drugog svetskog rata koja je eksplicitno kritikovala rastuću društvenu nejednakost, birokratizaciju i nezaposlenost, i zahtevala slobodu govora i ukidanje privilegija. Ovaj članak fokusira se na sudbinu osmoro profesora sa Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu bliskih Praksis idejama, koje je režim identifikovao kao podstrekače protesta i kasnije ih proterao sa fakulteta zbog njihove „moralno-političke nepodobnosti“. Nakon međunarodnih i unutrašnjih pritisaka, oni su kasnije ponovo zaposleni u zasebnoj istraživačkoj jedinici nazvanoj Centar za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, gde su zadržali svoju kritičku oštricu i zagovarali politički pluralizam. Od kraja osamdesetih godina prošlog veka, oni i njihove kolege iz Centra postaju politički aktivni, nalaze se među osnivačima i kasnije liderima Demokratske Stranke i povremeno zauzimaju najviše položaje u Srbiji – Dragoljub Mićunović kao predsedavajući Narodne skupštine, bivši srpski predsednik i premijer Vojislav Koštunica i nekadašnji premijer Zoran Đinđić. Međutim, dok su neki članovi osmorke i Centra postali čvrsti anti-nacionalisti i antiratni aktivisti, drugi su prigrlili srpski nacionalizam, tako predvodeći intelektualni razdor na Prvu i Drugi Srbiju koji je obeležio srpsko društvo devedesetih godina prošlog veka, i ostao uticajan do danas.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Belgrade 1968 Protests and the Post-Evental Fidelity: Intellectual and Political Legacy of the 1968 Student Protests in Serbia
IS  - 1
VL  - 30
SP  - 149
EP  - 164
DO  - https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1901149P
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Pavlović, Aleksandar and Losoncz, Mark",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Even though Belgrade student protests emerged and ended abruptly after only seven days in June of 1968, they came as a cumulative point of a decade-long accumulated social dissatisfaction and antagonisms, as well as of philosophical investigations of the unorthodox Marxists of the Praxis school (Praksisovci). It surprised the Yugoslav authorities as the first massive rebellion after WWII to explicitly criticize rising social inequality, bureaucratization and unemployment and demand free speech and abolishment of privileges. This article focuses on the intellectual destiny and legacy of the eight professors from the Faculty of Philosophy close to the Praxis school, who were identified as the protests’ instigators and subsequently expelled from the University of Belgrade due to their “ethico-political unsuitability”. Under both international and domestic pressure, they were later reemployed in a separate research unit named the Centre for Philosophy and Social Theory, where they kept their critical edge and argued for political pluralism. From the late 1980s onwards, they and their colleagues became politically active and at times occupied the highest positions in Serbia – Dragoljub Mićunović as one of the founders of the modern Democratic Party and the Speaker of the Parliament, former Serbian President and Prime Minister Vojislav Koštunica and former Prime Minister late Zoran Đinđić. Still, while some members became strong anti-nationalists and anti-war activists, other embraced Serbian nationalism, therefore pivoting the intellectual split into the so called First and Second Serbia that marked Serbian society during the 1990s and remained influential to this day., Drugog svetskog rata koja je eksplicitno kritikovala rastuću društvenu nejednakost, birokratizaciju i nezaposlenost, i zahtevala slobodu govora i ukidanje privilegija. Ovaj članak fokusira se na sudbinu osmoro profesora sa Filozofskog fakulteta u Beogradu bliskih Praksis idejama, koje je režim identifikovao kao podstrekače protesta i kasnije ih proterao sa fakulteta zbog njihove „moralno-političke nepodobnosti“. Nakon međunarodnih i unutrašnjih pritisaka, oni su kasnije ponovo zaposleni u zasebnoj istraživačkoj jedinici nazvanoj Centar za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, gde su zadržali svoju kritičku oštricu i zagovarali politički pluralizam. Od kraja osamdesetih godina prošlog veka, oni i njihove kolege iz Centra postaju politički aktivni, nalaze se među osnivačima i kasnije liderima Demokratske Stranke i povremeno zauzimaju najviše položaje u Srbiji – Dragoljub Mićunović kao predsedavajući Narodne skupštine, bivši srpski predsednik i premijer Vojislav Koštunica i nekadašnji premijer Zoran Đinđić. Međutim, dok su neki članovi osmorke i Centra postali čvrsti anti-nacionalisti i antiratni aktivisti, drugi su prigrlili srpski nacionalizam, tako predvodeći intelektualni razdor na Prvu i Drugi Srbiju koji je obeležio srpsko društvo devedesetih godina prošlog veka, i ostao uticajan do danas.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Belgrade 1968 Protests and the Post-Evental Fidelity: Intellectual and Political Legacy of the 1968 Student Protests in Serbia",
number = "1",
volume = "30",
pages = "149-164",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1901149P"
}
Pavlović, A.,& Losoncz, M.. (2019). Belgrade 1968 Protests and the Post-Evental Fidelity: Intellectual and Political Legacy of the 1968 Student Protests in Serbia. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 30(1), 149-164.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1901149P
Pavlović A, Losoncz M. Belgrade 1968 Protests and the Post-Evental Fidelity: Intellectual and Political Legacy of the 1968 Student Protests in Serbia. in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2019;30(1):149-164.
doi:https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1901149P .
Pavlović, Aleksandar, Losoncz, Mark, "Belgrade 1968 Protests and the Post-Evental Fidelity: Intellectual and Political Legacy of the 1968 Student Protests in Serbia" in Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society, 30, no. 1 (2019):149-164,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1901149P . .

Connection

Losoncz, Mark

(Charlottesville, Virginia: Philosophy Documentation Center, 2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Losoncz, Mark
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://www.pdcnet.org/philtoday/content/philtoday_2019_0063_0004_0903_0913
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/2074
AB  - There are productive material connections beyond mere internal or external
relations. The concept of connection enables a creative reinterpretation of certain
historical questions and, accordingly, the essay stresses the importance of the concepts
of connection, nexus, and fusion in many philosophies, from Aristotle to Deleuze.
PB  - Charlottesville, Virginia: Philosophy Documentation Center
T2  - Philosophy Today
T1  - Connection
IS  - 4
VL  - 63
SP  - 903
EP  - 913
DO  - https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday202016300
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Losoncz, Mark",
year = "2019",
abstract = "There are productive material connections beyond mere internal or external
relations. The concept of connection enables a creative reinterpretation of certain
historical questions and, accordingly, the essay stresses the importance of the concepts
of connection, nexus, and fusion in many philosophies, from Aristotle to Deleuze.",
publisher = "Charlottesville, Virginia: Philosophy Documentation Center",
journal = "Philosophy Today",
title = "Connection",
number = "4",
volume = "63",
pages = "903-913",
doi = "https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday202016300"
}
Losoncz, M.. (2019). Connection. in Philosophy Today
Charlottesville, Virginia: Philosophy Documentation Center., 63(4), 903-913.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday202016300
Losoncz M. Connection. in Philosophy Today. 2019;63(4):903-913.
doi:https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday202016300 .
Losoncz, Mark, "Connection" in Philosophy Today, 63, no. 4 (2019):903-913,
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday202016300 . .