Sort By
Publication Year
Deposit Date
Title
Type
Access
Publication Year
2016 (1)
2014 (4)
2012 (2)
2011 (2)
2010 (4)
2009 (1)
2007 (1)
Version

Babić, Jovan

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
aa98df94-30cb-44c4-91f6-806d27c0a7c4
  • Babić, Jovan (15)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

Svojina – filozofska analiza : argument

Babić, Jovan

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2016)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Babić, Jovan
PY  - 2016
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/393
AB  - Nakon kratkog istorijskog pregleda filozofskih pogleda na svojinu u tekstu se iznosi analiza argumenta kojim se svojina opravdava na osnovi univerzalnog poštovanja svačijeg prava na upotrebu stvari za bilo koju svrhu. Mogućnost upotrebe stvari za realizaciju postavljenih ciljeva je uslov mogućnosti delanja, kao stvarnog događanja u svetu. To je ono u čemu se ispoljava kapacitet slobode kao kauzalne moći u realnom svetu. Ali bez izglednosti na završetak započetog procesa realizacije cilja ta kauzalna moć bi bila praktično obesmišljena (iako bi i dalje postojala kao realna ontološka mogućnost). Svojina je shema unutar koje ova izglednost postaje aktualna, i otuda je svojina zapravo sastojak i nužna pretpostav- ka slobode kao mogućnosti svrhovitog delanja. Svojina menja normativnu pozici- ju svih drugih, oni (više) nemaju pravo slobodnog korišćenja zaposednutih stvari (onih koje su postale predmet svojine). Kao pravo svojina povlači, prvo, dužnost
poštovanja poseda koja, pored zabrane sprečavanja tuđeg korišćenja stvari u po- sedu uključuje i obavezu nesprečavanja bilo čije upotrebe i raspolaganja stvarima koje nisu već zaposednute: svačija svojina se mora poštovati, ničija svojina se mo- že slobodno zaposesti (neki oblici svojine su opšta ili kolektivna svojina). Drugo,
tek kao vlasništvo, u kome pravo raspolaganja više ne zavisi od faktičke moći ras- polaganja u posedu, svojina dobija svoj puni normativni i praktički kapacitet. Vlasništvo je garancija budućnosti prava svojine. Za ovo je potrebno eksplicitno priznanje činjenice uspostavljenosti prava raspolaganja od strane svih drugih, priznanje koje nužno sledi (ne može da se uskrati) ukoliko niko nije povređen ovim raspolaganjem. To sledi iz prirode razlike između stvari i osoba, koje su ličnosti sa kapacitetom za slobodno delanje (korišćenje sredstava za realizaciju postavljenih
ciljeva). Po svojoj prirodi stvari se mogu posedovati, a kako je upotreba sredstava za bilo koji legitimni cilj takođe legitimna to svaka neposedovana stvar može bez prepreka postati predmet svojine, bilo zaposedanjem bilo transferom.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Svojina – filozofska analiza : argument
SP  - 203
EP  - 224
DO  - 10.2298/FID1601203B
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Babić, Jovan",
year = "2016",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/393",
abstract = "Nakon kratkog istorijskog pregleda filozofskih pogleda na svojinu u tekstu se iznosi analiza argumenta kojim se svojina opravdava na osnovi univerzalnog poštovanja svačijeg prava na upotrebu stvari za bilo koju svrhu. Mogućnost upotrebe stvari za realizaciju postavljenih ciljeva je uslov mogućnosti delanja, kao stvarnog događanja u svetu. To je ono u čemu se ispoljava kapacitet slobode kao kauzalne moći u realnom svetu. Ali bez izglednosti na završetak započetog procesa realizacije cilja ta kauzalna moć bi bila praktično obesmišljena (iako bi i dalje postojala kao realna ontološka mogućnost). Svojina je shema unutar koje ova izglednost postaje aktualna, i otuda je svojina zapravo sastojak i nužna pretpostav- ka slobode kao mogućnosti svrhovitog delanja. Svojina menja normativnu pozici- ju svih drugih, oni (više) nemaju pravo slobodnog korišćenja zaposednutih stvari (onih koje su postale predmet svojine). Kao pravo svojina povlači, prvo, dužnost
poštovanja poseda koja, pored zabrane sprečavanja tuđeg korišćenja stvari u po- sedu uključuje i obavezu nesprečavanja bilo čije upotrebe i raspolaganja stvarima koje nisu već zaposednute: svačija svojina se mora poštovati, ničija svojina se mo- že slobodno zaposesti (neki oblici svojine su opšta ili kolektivna svojina). Drugo,
tek kao vlasništvo, u kome pravo raspolaganja više ne zavisi od faktičke moći ras- polaganja u posedu, svojina dobija svoj puni normativni i praktički kapacitet. Vlasništvo je garancija budućnosti prava svojine. Za ovo je potrebno eksplicitno priznanje činjenice uspostavljenosti prava raspolaganja od strane svih drugih, priznanje koje nužno sledi (ne može da se uskrati) ukoliko niko nije povređen ovim raspolaganjem. To sledi iz prirode razlike između stvari i osoba, koje su ličnosti sa kapacitetom za slobodno delanje (korišćenje sredstava za realizaciju postavljenih
ciljeva). Po svojoj prirodi stvari se mogu posedovati, a kako je upotreba sredstava za bilo koji legitimni cilj takođe legitimna to svaka neposedovana stvar može bez prepreka postati predmet svojine, bilo zaposedanjem bilo transferom.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Svojina – filozofska analiza : argument",
pages = "203-224",
doi = "10.2298/FID1601203B"
}
Babić, J. (2016). Svojina – filozofska analiza : argument.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and SocietyBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 203-224.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1601203B
Babić J. Svojina – filozofska analiza : argument. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2016;:203-224
Babić Jovan, "Svojina – filozofska analiza : argument" (2016):203-224,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1601203B .

Neuroetika i filozofija

Babić, Jovan

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2014)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Babić, Jovan
PY  - 2014
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/214
AB  - Neuroetika je najnovija i verovatno najbrze rastuca grana bioetike i, mozda, primenjene etike uopste. U njoj se polazi od teze da odredeni pri- rodni procesi u mozgu i nervima proizvode odredena moralna i nemoralna ponasanja (a nisu samo prirodna osnova takvih dogadanja). Kao prirodni procesi ovi dogadaji se onda mogu do kraja i bez ostatka uzrocno objasniti. U tom smislu neuroetika bi trebalo daje zavrsnica i vrhunac neuronauke (neurologije i drugih njoj bliskih nauka), koja u nase vreme zaista dozivljava ogroman napredak. U tekstu se ukazuje na izvesne metafizicke i eticke tesko- ce ovog pristupa, pre svega u preklapanju pojmova (uzrocnog) objasnjenja i (razloznog) opravdanja u nacinu definisanja vrednosti, ne samo moralnih. Sasvim je sigurno da je funkcionisanje nervnog sistema vazan parametar u opisu i objasnjenju pre svega oseta i osecanja, a onda i svega ostalog sto se na vrednosnom planu gradi na toj osnovi. Znanje o procesima sa kojima se tu srecemo sigurno moze pomoci ne samo da se otklone razni problemi koji ugrozavaju kvalitet ljudskog zivota nego se moze iskoristiti i za poboljsanje tog kvaliteta tamo gde on nije direktno ugrozen. U tom smislu neuroetika spada u etiku sredstava (kako koncipirati, proizvesti, distribuisati i upotrebiti to znanje). Ali pretenzija neuroetike ide dalje od ove instrumentalne upotrebe znanja do kojih dolazi neuronauka i proteze se na artikulaciju ciljeva i na pretpostavku da se ta artikulacija moze upotpunosti uzrocno objasniti. Glavni fokus rada upravoje analiza ove pretenzije, kroz analizu razlika izmedu uzro- ka i razloga, objasnjenja i opravdanja, sredstava i ciljeva. Na kraju, u odeljku oprimenama, daje se sumarni pregled koristi i rizika koje neuroetika donosi, sa zakljuckom da ona sigurno moze znacajno pomoci da se kvalitet ukupnog zivota, individualnog i socijalnog, unapredi.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Neuroetika i filozofija
SP  - 181
EP  - 203
DO  - 10.2298/FID1402181B
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Babić, Jovan",
year = "2014",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/214",
abstract = "Neuroetika je najnovija i verovatno najbrze rastuca grana bioetike i, mozda, primenjene etike uopste. U njoj se polazi od teze da odredeni pri- rodni procesi u mozgu i nervima proizvode odredena moralna i nemoralna ponasanja (a nisu samo prirodna osnova takvih dogadanja). Kao prirodni procesi ovi dogadaji se onda mogu do kraja i bez ostatka uzrocno objasniti. U tom smislu neuroetika bi trebalo daje zavrsnica i vrhunac neuronauke (neurologije i drugih njoj bliskih nauka), koja u nase vreme zaista dozivljava ogroman napredak. U tekstu se ukazuje na izvesne metafizicke i eticke tesko- ce ovog pristupa, pre svega u preklapanju pojmova (uzrocnog) objasnjenja i (razloznog) opravdanja u nacinu definisanja vrednosti, ne samo moralnih. Sasvim je sigurno da je funkcionisanje nervnog sistema vazan parametar u opisu i objasnjenju pre svega oseta i osecanja, a onda i svega ostalog sto se na vrednosnom planu gradi na toj osnovi. Znanje o procesima sa kojima se tu srecemo sigurno moze pomoci ne samo da se otklone razni problemi koji ugrozavaju kvalitet ljudskog zivota nego se moze iskoristiti i za poboljsanje tog kvaliteta tamo gde on nije direktno ugrozen. U tom smislu neuroetika spada u etiku sredstava (kako koncipirati, proizvesti, distribuisati i upotrebiti to znanje). Ali pretenzija neuroetike ide dalje od ove instrumentalne upotrebe znanja do kojih dolazi neuronauka i proteze se na artikulaciju ciljeva i na pretpostavku da se ta artikulacija moze upotpunosti uzrocno objasniti. Glavni fokus rada upravoje analiza ove pretenzije, kroz analizu razlika izmedu uzro- ka i razloga, objasnjenja i opravdanja, sredstava i ciljeva. Na kraju, u odeljku oprimenama, daje se sumarni pregled koristi i rizika koje neuroetika donosi, sa zakljuckom da ona sigurno moze znacajno pomoci da se kvalitet ukupnog zivota, individualnog i socijalnog, unapredi.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Neuroetika i filozofija",
pages = "181-203",
doi = "10.2298/FID1402181B"
}
Babić, J. (2014). Neuroetika i filozofija.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and SocietyBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 181-203.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1402181B
Babić J. Neuroetika i filozofija. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2014;:181-203
Babić Jovan, "Neuroetika i filozofija" (2014):181-203,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1402181B .

The value narrative in the moral justification of international intervention

Bojanić, Petar D.; Babić, Jovan; Vasiljević, Jelena; Fatić, Aleksandar

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2014)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Fatić, Aleksandar
PY  - 2014
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/364
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Book of Abstracts: 13th International Law and Ethics Conference Series: “What does it mean to win a war?
T1  - The value narrative in the moral justification of international intervention
SP  - 20
EP  - 21
ER  - 
@article{
editor = "Bojanić, Petar D., Babić, Jovan, Vasiljević, Jelena",
author = "Fatić, Aleksandar",
year = "2014",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/364",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Book of Abstracts: 13th International Law and Ethics Conference Series: “What does it mean to win a war?",
title = "The value narrative in the moral justification of international intervention",
pages = "20-21"
}
Bojanić, P. D., Babić, J., Vasiljević, J.,& Fatić, A. (2014). The value narrative in the moral justification of international intervention.
Book of Abstracts: 13th International Law and Ethics Conference Series: “What does it mean to win a war?Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 20-21.
Bojanić PD, Babić J, Vasiljević J, Fatić A. The value narrative in the moral justification of international intervention. Book of Abstracts: 13th International Law and Ethics Conference Series: “What does it mean to win a war?. 2014;:20-21
Bojanić Petar D., Babić Jovan, Vasiljević Jelena, Fatić Aleksandar, "The value narrative in the moral justification of international intervention" (2014):20-21

Spor oko prosvetiteljstva: istorija i savremenost jedne kontroverze

Babić, Jovan; Krstić, Predrag

(Beograd : Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet, 2014)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Krstić, Predrag
PY  - 2014
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/181
AB  - Moglo bi se reći da je prosvetiteljstvo (prosvećenost), već od svojih modernih početaka pa sve do savremenih rasprava o njegovom značaju, u hroničnoj nedoumici oko vlastitog odreĎenja i razumevanja. Namera ovog rada je da, pre svega, rasvetli
podležeće i produktivne aspekte upotrebe tog naizgled samorazumljivog, a često do nerazabirljivosti višesmislenog pojma. To će se postići detekcijom smeštanja, izmeštanja i premeštanja težišta njegovog značenja i dejstva kod različitih autora koji su ga tematizovali od osamnaestog veka do danas. Kantova definicija prosvećenosti iz njegovog članka „Odgovor na pitanje: šta je prosvećenost?“ poslužiće pritom kao osnovni talon na kojem će se iskušavati vizije prosvetiteljstva. Čini se da se ona pokazala onom nezaobilaznom instancom s obzorom na koju se – priznanjem njene neprolazne merodavnosti, preadaptacijom ili osporavanjem – i dalje artikulišu ili makar
prikladno prireĎuju i od nje drugačije koncepcije  prosvetiteljstva...
PB  - Beograd : Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet
T1  - Spor oko prosvetiteljstva: istorija i savremenost jedne kontroverze
T1  - The enlightenment dispute: history and modernity of a controversy
ER  - 
@phdthesis{
editor = "Babić, Jovan",
author = "Krstić, Predrag",
year = "2014",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/181",
abstract = "Moglo bi se reći da je prosvetiteljstvo (prosvećenost), već od svojih modernih početaka pa sve do savremenih rasprava o njegovom značaju, u hroničnoj nedoumici oko vlastitog odreĎenja i razumevanja. Namera ovog rada je da, pre svega, rasvetli
podležeće i produktivne aspekte upotrebe tog naizgled samorazumljivog, a često do nerazabirljivosti višesmislenog pojma. To će se postići detekcijom smeštanja, izmeštanja i premeštanja težišta njegovog značenja i dejstva kod različitih autora koji su ga tematizovali od osamnaestog veka do danas. Kantova definicija prosvećenosti iz njegovog članka „Odgovor na pitanje: šta je prosvećenost?“ poslužiće pritom kao osnovni talon na kojem će se iskušavati vizije prosvetiteljstva. Čini se da se ona pokazala onom nezaobilaznom instancom s obzorom na koju se – priznanjem njene neprolazne merodavnosti, preadaptacijom ili osporavanjem – i dalje artikulišu ili makar
prikladno prireĎuju i od nje drugačije koncepcije  prosvetiteljstva...",
publisher = "Beograd : Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet",
title = "Spor oko prosvetiteljstva: istorija i savremenost jedne kontroverze, The enlightenment dispute: history and modernity of a controversy"
}
Babić, J.,& Krstić, P. (2014). The enlightenment dispute: history and modernity of a controversy.
Beograd : Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet..
Babić J, Krstić P. The enlightenment dispute: history and modernity of a controversy. 2014;
Babić Jovan, Krstić Predrag, "The enlightenment dispute: history and modernity of a controversy" (2014)

Book of Abstracts: 13th International Law and Ethics Conference Series: “What does it mean to win a war?

Bojanić, Petar D.; Babić, Jovan; Vasiljević, Jelena

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2014)

TY  - BOOK
PY  - 2014
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/287
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - Book of Abstracts: 13th International Law and Ethics Conference Series: “What does it mean to win a war?
ER  - 
@book{
editor = "Bojanić, Petar D., Babić, Jovan, Vasiljević, Jelena",
year = "2014",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/287",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "Book of Abstracts: 13th International Law and Ethics Conference Series: “What does it mean to win a war?"
}
Bojanić, P. D., Babić, J.,& Vasiljević, J. (2014). Book of Abstracts: 13th International Law and Ethics Conference Series: “What does it mean to win a war?.
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
Bojanić PD, Babić J, Vasiljević J. Book of Abstracts: 13th International Law and Ethics Conference Series: “What does it mean to win a war?. 2014;
Bojanić Petar D., Babić Jovan, Vasiljević Jelena, "Book of Abstracts: 13th International Law and Ethics Conference Series: “What does it mean to win a war?" (2014)

Globalno upravljanje svetom

Bojanić, Petar D.; Babić, Jovan

(Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta; Dosije studio, 2012)

TY  - BOOK
PY  - 2012
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/115
PB  - Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta; Dosije studio
T1  - Globalno upravljanje svetom
ER  - 
@book{
editor = "Bojanić, Petar D., Babić, Jovan",
year = "2012",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/115",
publisher = "Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta; Dosije studio",
title = "Globalno upravljanje svetom"
}
Bojanić, P. D.,& Babić, J. (2012). Globalno upravljanje svetom.
Beograd : Pravni fakultet Univerziteta; Dosije studio..
Bojanić PD, Babić J. Globalno upravljanje svetom. 2012;
Bojanić Petar D., Babić Jovan, "Globalno upravljanje svetom" (2012)

Pacifism : Still the Issue

Bojanić, Petar D.; Babić, Jovan; Statman, Daniel; Univerzitet u Beogradu, Serbian Philosophical Society, IFDT, CELAP

(Belgrade : Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, 2012)

TY  - CONF
PY  - 2012
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1097
AB  - The 12th ILECS conference (International Law and Ethics 
Conference Series) is devoted to the issue of Pacifism,once
much more popular theme than today. In times when we 
rethink the issue of the war, from its criminalization through 
its instrumentalization in humanitarian interventions to its 
usage in “asymmetric” and anti-terrorist warfare and its role 
in the attempt to legalize torture, pacifism might seem to be 
quite obsolete and redundant. Could it mean that pacifism is 
not an issue anymore? Or, as we found in the theme of world 
governance in one of the previous ILECS conferences, it is one 
of those issues which are always with us, looming from the mist 
of unstable reality, as a promise, or false promise, or as a refuge 
or escape? Or could it be a long awaited, even a final, solution 
guarding us from pitfalls and predicaments of our uncertain 
and non-transparent future full of threatening conflicts? We do 
not expect all these questions to be answered, but perhaps it is 
proper time to raise them again.
PB  - Belgrade : Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory
T1  - Pacifism : Still the Issue
ER  - 
@conference{
editor = "Bojanić, Petar D., Babić, Jovan, Statman, Daniel, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Serbian Philosophical Society, IFDT, CELAP",
year = "2012",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1097",
abstract = "The 12th ILECS conference (International Law and Ethics 
Conference Series) is devoted to the issue of Pacifism,once
much more popular theme than today. In times when we 
rethink the issue of the war, from its criminalization through 
its instrumentalization in humanitarian interventions to its 
usage in “asymmetric” and anti-terrorist warfare and its role 
in the attempt to legalize torture, pacifism might seem to be 
quite obsolete and redundant. Could it mean that pacifism is 
not an issue anymore? Or, as we found in the theme of world 
governance in one of the previous ILECS conferences, it is one 
of those issues which are always with us, looming from the mist 
of unstable reality, as a promise, or false promise, or as a refuge 
or escape? Or could it be a long awaited, even a final, solution 
guarding us from pitfalls and predicaments of our uncertain 
and non-transparent future full of threatening conflicts? We do 
not expect all these questions to be answered, but perhaps it is 
proper time to raise them again.",
publisher = "Belgrade : Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory",
title = "Pacifism : Still the Issue"
}
Bojanić, P. D., Babić, J., Statman, D.,& Univerzitet u Beogradu, S. P. S. I. C. (2012). Pacifism : Still the Issue.
Belgrade : Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory..
Bojanić PD, Babić J, Statman D, Univerzitet u Beogradu SPSIC. Pacifism : Still the Issue. 2012;
Bojanić Petar D., Babić Jovan, Statman Daniel, Univerzitet u Beogradu Serbian Philosophical Society IFDT CELAP, "Pacifism : Still the Issue" (2012)

Europe in the emerging world order searching for a new paradigm

Babić, Jovan; Bojanić, Petar D.; Pudar, Gazela

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2011)

TY  - BOOK
PY  - 2011
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/877
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T1  - Europe in the emerging world order searching for a new paradigm
ER  - 
@book{
editor = "Babić, Jovan, Bojanić, Petar D., Pudar, Gazela",
year = "2011",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/877",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
title = "Europe in the emerging world order searching for a new paradigm"
}
Babić, J., Bojanić, P. D.,& Pudar, G. (2011). Europe in the emerging world order searching for a new paradigm.
Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju..
Babić J, Bojanić PD, Pudar G. Europe in the emerging world order searching for a new paradigm. 2011;
Babić Jovan, Bojanić Petar D., Pudar Gazela, "Europe in the emerging world order searching for a new paradigm" (2011)

Searching for a new Paradigm

Babić, Jovan; Bojanić, Petar D.

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2011)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Babić, Jovan
AU  - Bojanić, Petar D.
PY  - 2011
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/948
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Europe in the emerging world order searching for a new paradigm
T1  - Searching for a new Paradigm
SP  - 7
EP  - 9
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Babić, Jovan and Bojanić, Petar D.",
year = "2011",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/948",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Europe in the emerging world order searching for a new paradigm",
title = "Searching for a new Paradigm",
pages = "7-9"
}
Babić, J.,& Bojanić, P. D. (2011). Searching for a new Paradigm.
Europe in the emerging world order searching for a new paradigmBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 7-9.
Babić J, Bojanić PD. Searching for a new Paradigm. Europe in the emerging world order searching for a new paradigm. 2011;:7-9
Babić Jovan, Bojanić Petar D., "Searching for a new Paradigm" (2011):7-9

Asymmetric Wars, International Relations, and Just War Theory

Bojanić, Petar D.; Babić, Jovan; Benbaji, Yitzhak; Univerzitet u Beogradu, FDS i CELAP

(2010)

TY  - CONF
PY  - 2010
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1158
AB  - In this age of the overarching globalization and increased public sensitivity, conflict resolution is becoming more and more demanding both in terms of its goals and its techniques. The war has become almost forbidden, and old schemes of justifying wars no longer appear satisfying. Justifying war always seemed to be a hopeless task: at the same time impossible and necessary. Being tragic and often also absurd throughout the history, war is now facing the challenge of a change its very definition. Its nature of unpredictability and irreversibility, its constitutive rules of victory and defeat, seem to be in the process of an extensive change, with new aspects and issues emerging: criminalization of war, new ways of justifying military interventions, and a huge set of instruments of justifying “asymmetric wars”, “wars on terror”, pre-emptive and preventive wars, peace-making and peace-keeping activities, regime change strategies, etc. Just War Theory and its justificatory capacity is (again) at the crossroad: is it a new chance to further its development, or a sign of its end? These and other issues regarding contemporary debate about the war are worth further exploration from the philosophical point of view.
T1  - Asymmetric Wars, International Relations, and Just War Theory
ER  - 
@conference{
editor = "Bojanić, Petar D., Babić, Jovan, Benbaji, Yitzhak, Univerzitet u Beogradu, FDS i CELAP",
year = "2010",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1158",
abstract = "In this age of the overarching globalization and increased public sensitivity, conflict resolution is becoming more and more demanding both in terms of its goals and its techniques. The war has become almost forbidden, and old schemes of justifying wars no longer appear satisfying. Justifying war always seemed to be a hopeless task: at the same time impossible and necessary. Being tragic and often also absurd throughout the history, war is now facing the challenge of a change its very definition. Its nature of unpredictability and irreversibility, its constitutive rules of victory and defeat, seem to be in the process of an extensive change, with new aspects and issues emerging: criminalization of war, new ways of justifying military interventions, and a huge set of instruments of justifying “asymmetric wars”, “wars on terror”, pre-emptive and preventive wars, peace-making and peace-keeping activities, regime change strategies, etc. Just War Theory and its justificatory capacity is (again) at the crossroad: is it a new chance to further its development, or a sign of its end? These and other issues regarding contemporary debate about the war are worth further exploration from the philosophical point of view.",
title = "Asymmetric Wars, International Relations, and Just War Theory"
}
Bojanić, P. D., Babić, J., Benbaji, Y.,& Univerzitet u Beogradu, F. i. C. (2010). Asymmetric Wars, International Relations, and Just War Theory.
.
Bojanić PD, Babić J, Benbaji Y, Univerzitet u Beogradu FIC. Asymmetric Wars, International Relations, and Just War Theory. 2010;
Bojanić Petar D., Babić Jovan, Benbaji Yitzhak, Univerzitet u Beogradu FDS i CELAP, "Asymmetric Wars, International Relations, and Just War Theory" (2010)

Europe in the Emerging World Order. Searching for a New Paradigm

Bojanić, Petar D.; Babić, Jovan; Riha, Rado; Univerzitet u Beogradu, IFDT, CELAP

(Belgrade : Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, 2010)

TY  - CONF
PY  - 2010
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1104
AB  - This international conference bought together in one place philosophers, sociologists, lawyers, political scientists and economists who are trying to provide answers to some very complex issues relating to Europe, its community and its place in a complex world order (or chaos) occurring. Which vision Europe will continue to build its future at? Which normative order will prevail in the social field, which will be a key feature of its identity? Is Europe moving towards hegemonizating monolithic religious identity? Can Europe be a peaceful democratic community and still strives to be global power? Or will it simply become an economic empire “without borders”?
PB  - Belgrade : Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory
T1  - Europe in the Emerging World Order. Searching for a New Paradigm
ER  - 
@conference{
editor = "Bojanić, Petar D., Babić, Jovan, Riha, Rado, Univerzitet u Beogradu, IFDT, CELAP",
year = "2010",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1104",
abstract = "This international conference bought together in one place philosophers, sociologists, lawyers, political scientists and economists who are trying to provide answers to some very complex issues relating to Europe, its community and its place in a complex world order (or chaos) occurring. Which vision Europe will continue to build its future at? Which normative order will prevail in the social field, which will be a key feature of its identity? Is Europe moving towards hegemonizating monolithic religious identity? Can Europe be a peaceful democratic community and still strives to be global power? Or will it simply become an economic empire “without borders”?",
publisher = "Belgrade : Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory",
title = "Europe in the Emerging World Order. Searching for a New Paradigm"
}
Bojanić, P. D., Babić, J., Riha, R.,& Univerzitet u Beogradu, I. C. (2010). Europe in the Emerging World Order. Searching for a New Paradigm.
Belgrade : Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory..
Bojanić PD, Babić J, Riha R, Univerzitet u Beogradu IC. Europe in the Emerging World Order. Searching for a New Paradigm. 2010;
Bojanić Petar D., Babić Jovan, Riha Rado, Univerzitet u Beogradu IFDT CELAP, "Europe in the Emerging World Order. Searching for a New Paradigm" (2010)

Pirates and the World as a Closed Commercial State

Bojanić, Petar D.; Babić, Jovan; Bojanić, Petar D.

(London-Newcastle upon Tyne : Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2010)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Bojanić, Petar D.
PY  - 2010
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/982
AB  - Before I explain this complicated title, especially the quotation marks around the word “Pirates,” and before I reveal my intention and attempt to provisionally justify it (in the title I discretely introduce and transform Fichte's Closed Commercial State into a great world state or empire, always open and borderless; I assume that a world as such cannot be closed), I will first cite a part of the 54th paragraph from Kant's 1797 work The Metaphysics of Morals. My intention is not to simply evoke Carl Schmitt's critique of Kant's ideas concerning preemptive war and the unjust enemy—as we all know, these ideas were not Kant's nor is their critique original (Schmitt, 2006:168–171) after all, both Kant and Schmitt are simply brilliant compilers in international law—rather, I want to preliminarily demonstrate that every project concerning the constitution of an empire, league of nations or world government (or world governance) implies a paradoxical existence of an ambiguous “exterior” (“outside,” “without”). It seems that the existence (or nonexistence) of something “outside” of the world or “outside” of borderless sovereignty, is a precondition for any theory of world governance.

In the chapter which deals with public right (the Right of Nations), Kant presents four basic elements of natural rights. We are interested in the third element:

A league of nations in accordance with the idea of an original social contract is necessary, not in order to meddle in one another's internal dissensions but to protect against attacks from without (Kant, 1996:482ndash;483).

Two editors of Kant's works believed that Kant did not provide an object to which this sentence is referring. Vorländer believed that “enemies” (outside enemies) [gegen Angriffe der äuβeren Feinde zu schützen] should be added, while Natorp thought that “nations,” were in question, meaning that attacks come from other nations/people. I find the existence of any “outside”/“without”, any sort of space for an enemy or nation (for a terrorist, pirate or alien) problematic because a union of nations, as well as an empire, surely assumes that all nations are already inside and together. Why does a project concerning the union of all nations presume the existence of another space? How is it possible that something else exists, another entity or figure, that does not take part in finalizing this new community and new unity? Does every fusion and union presuppose omission and exclusion?
PB  - London-Newcastle upon Tyne : Cambridge Scholars Publishing
T2  - World Governance : Do We Need It, Is It Possible,  What Could It (All)  Mean?
T1  - Pirates and the World as a Closed Commercial State
SP  - 262
EP  - 271
DO  - 10.5848/CSP.2302.00015
ER  - 
@article{
editor = "Bojanić, Petar D., Babić, Jovan",
author = "Bojanić, Petar D.",
year = "2010",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/982",
abstract = "Before I explain this complicated title, especially the quotation marks around the word “Pirates,” and before I reveal my intention and attempt to provisionally justify it (in the title I discretely introduce and transform Fichte's Closed Commercial State into a great world state or empire, always open and borderless; I assume that a world as such cannot be closed), I will first cite a part of the 54th paragraph from Kant's 1797 work The Metaphysics of Morals. My intention is not to simply evoke Carl Schmitt's critique of Kant's ideas concerning preemptive war and the unjust enemy—as we all know, these ideas were not Kant's nor is their critique original (Schmitt, 2006:168–171) after all, both Kant and Schmitt are simply brilliant compilers in international law—rather, I want to preliminarily demonstrate that every project concerning the constitution of an empire, league of nations or world government (or world governance) implies a paradoxical existence of an ambiguous “exterior” (“outside,” “without”). It seems that the existence (or nonexistence) of something “outside” of the world or “outside” of borderless sovereignty, is a precondition for any theory of world governance.

In the chapter which deals with public right (the Right of Nations), Kant presents four basic elements of natural rights. We are interested in the third element:

A league of nations in accordance with the idea of an original social contract is necessary, not in order to meddle in one another's internal dissensions but to protect against attacks from without (Kant, 1996:482ndash;483).

Two editors of Kant's works believed that Kant did not provide an object to which this sentence is referring. Vorländer believed that “enemies” (outside enemies) [gegen Angriffe der äuβeren Feinde zu schützen] should be added, while Natorp thought that “nations,” were in question, meaning that attacks come from other nations/people. I find the existence of any “outside”/“without”, any sort of space for an enemy or nation (for a terrorist, pirate or alien) problematic because a union of nations, as well as an empire, surely assumes that all nations are already inside and together. Why does a project concerning the union of all nations presume the existence of another space? How is it possible that something else exists, another entity or figure, that does not take part in finalizing this new community and new unity? Does every fusion and union presuppose omission and exclusion?",
publisher = "London-Newcastle upon Tyne : Cambridge Scholars Publishing",
journal = "World Governance : Do We Need It, Is It Possible,  What Could It (All)  Mean?",
title = "Pirates and the World as a Closed Commercial State",
pages = "262-271",
doi = "10.5848/CSP.2302.00015"
}
Bojanić, P. D., Babić, J.,& Bojanić, P. D. (2010). Pirates and the World as a Closed Commercial State.
World Governance : Do We Need It, Is It Possible,  What Could It (All)  Mean?London-Newcastle upon Tyne : Cambridge Scholars Publishing., 262-271.
https://doi.org/10.5848/CSP.2302.00015
Bojanić PD, Babić J, Bojanić PD. Pirates and the World as a Closed Commercial State. World Governance : Do We Need It, Is It Possible,  What Could It (All)  Mean?. 2010;:262-271
Bojanić Petar D., Babić Jovan, Bojanić Petar D., "Pirates and the World as a Closed Commercial State" (2010):262-271,
https://doi.org/10.5848/CSP.2302.00015 .

Moral i prljave ruke : filozofija, politika i rat

Babić, Jovan; Bojanić, Petar D.; Volzer, Majkl

(Beograd : Albatros plus, 2010)

TY  - BOOK
AU  - Volzer, Majkl
PY  - 2010
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/108
PB  - Beograd : Albatros plus
T1  - Moral i prljave ruke : filozofija, politika i rat
ER  - 
@book{
editor = "Babić, Jovan, Bojanić, Petar D.",
author = "Volzer, Majkl",
year = "2010",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/108",
publisher = "Beograd : Albatros plus",
title = "Moral i prljave ruke : filozofija, politika i rat"
}
Babić, J., Bojanić, P. D.,& Volzer, M. (2010). Moral i prljave ruke : filozofija, politika i rat.
Beograd : Albatros plus..
Babić J, Bojanić PD, Volzer M. Moral i prljave ruke : filozofija, politika i rat. 2010;
Babić Jovan, Bojanić Petar D., Volzer Majkl, "Moral i prljave ruke : filozofija, politika i rat" (2010)

Predgovor

Bojanić, Petar D.; Babić, Jovan

(Beograd : Službeni glasnik, 2009)

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Bojanić, Petar D.
AU  - Babić, Jovan
PY  - 2009
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1047
PB  - Beograd : Službeni glasnik
T2  - Secesija, tranziciona pravda, i  pomirenje
T1  - Predgovor
SP  - 7
EP  - 12
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Bojanić, Petar D. and Babić, Jovan",
year = "2009",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/1047",
publisher = "Beograd : Službeni glasnik",
journal = "Secesija, tranziciona pravda, i  pomirenje",
title = "Predgovor",
pages = "7-12"
}
Bojanić, P. D.,& Babić, J. (2009). Predgovor.
Secesija, tranziciona pravda, i  pomirenjeBeograd : Službeni glasnik., 7-12.
Bojanić PD, Babić J. Predgovor. Secesija, tranziciona pravda, i  pomirenje. 2009;:7-12
Bojanić Petar D., Babić Jovan, "Predgovor" (2009):7-12

Non-culpable ignorance and just war theory

Babić, Jovan

(Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 2007)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Babić, Jovan
PY  - 2007
UR  - http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/123
AB  - The so called “non-culpable ignorance” is an instrument to justify participating in a war on a defeated side, on condition that fighters sincerely believe that they are defending a just cause and had some valid reasons to believe in having a
chance to win. Within the just war theory this instrument is needed to make both sides prima facie right, otherwise the theory would imply that those who lose are guilty in advance, especially if they are the weaker side. However, in contemporary context of criminalizing war the very concept of war is changing and becoming extremely vague.
As wars are more and more “asymmetric”, just war theory might face serious challenges regarding incorporation of “non-culpable ignorance” within its scope, as well as difficulties in showing that justice goes with the victory, opening thus the issues of articulation of a just peace.
PB  - Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju
T2  - Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society
T1  - Non-culpable ignorance and just war theory
SP  - 59
EP  - 68
DO  - 10.2298/FID0703059B
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Babić, Jovan",
year = "2007",
url = "http://rifdt.instifdt.bg.ac.rs/123456789/123",
abstract = "The so called “non-culpable ignorance” is an instrument to justify participating in a war on a defeated side, on condition that fighters sincerely believe that they are defending a just cause and had some valid reasons to believe in having a
chance to win. Within the just war theory this instrument is needed to make both sides prima facie right, otherwise the theory would imply that those who lose are guilty in advance, especially if they are the weaker side. However, in contemporary context of criminalizing war the very concept of war is changing and becoming extremely vague.
As wars are more and more “asymmetric”, just war theory might face serious challenges regarding incorporation of “non-culpable ignorance” within its scope, as well as difficulties in showing that justice goes with the victory, opening thus the issues of articulation of a just peace.",
publisher = "Beograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju",
journal = "Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society",
title = "Non-culpable ignorance and just war theory",
pages = "59-68",
doi = "10.2298/FID0703059B"
}
Babić, J. (2007). Non-culpable ignorance and just war theory.
Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and SocietyBeograd : Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju., 59-68.
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0703059B
Babić J. Non-culpable ignorance and just war theory. Filozofija i društvo/Philosophy and Society. 2007;:59-68
Babić Jovan, "Non-culpable ignorance and just war theory" (2007):59-68,
https://doi.org/10.2298/FID0703059B .